本文選題：傳統(tǒng)文化的國際保護(hù) + 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立法�。� 參考：《哈爾濱工程大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)文化是人類文化重要的組成部分，體現(xiàn)了一個(gè)民族乃至一個(gè)國家獨(dú)特的文化特征。然而在國際范圍內(nèi)，尚未建立傳統(tǒng)文化的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)機(jī)制，傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)意識(shí)的薄弱，以及法律機(jī)制的缺失，導(dǎo)致一國的文化遺產(chǎn)遭到其他國家的不適當(dāng)利用與濫用。 基于此，，本文在梳理立法問題的同時(shí)，提出了傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的利益平衡機(jī)制以及國內(nèi)立法與國際立法問題。發(fā)達(dá)國家與發(fā)展中國家，傳統(tǒng)文化的來源地與其他地區(qū)，傳統(tǒng)文化傳承人與改編者、使用者的利益失衡問題亟待解決，傳統(tǒng)文化的來源地以及傳統(tǒng)文化創(chuàng)作傳承人應(yīng)積極謀求利益平衡機(jī)制，以維護(hù)傳統(tǒng)文化來源地與傳承人的精神利益與經(jīng)濟(jì)利益。同時(shí)，在立法時(shí)應(yīng)注意國內(nèi)法與國際法的銜接，如何平衡傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的國際保護(hù)與國內(nèi)保護(hù)之間的關(guān)系，也是制定傳統(tǒng)文化法律保護(hù)機(jī)制的重點(diǎn)之一。這也是建立良好的傳統(tǒng)文化國際保護(hù)制度的前提。 對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國際保護(hù)的立法重構(gòu)，本文確定了與傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)相關(guān)的基本概念，并建議在立法保護(hù)方面，應(yīng)實(shí)行私權(quán)與公權(quán)相結(jié)合的立法機(jī)制，一方面在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域內(nèi)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)文化進(jìn)行保護(hù)，另一方面對(duì)傳統(tǒng)文化的文化權(quán)利進(jìn)行保護(hù)。本文提出了運(yùn)用國際條約中的彈性條款對(duì)傳統(tǒng)文化進(jìn)行保護(hù)，以TRIPs為例。由于TRIPs協(xié)議中并未加入對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)文化的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)，因此只有從彈性條款中找到與之相聯(lián)系的條款并加以運(yùn)用。以我國為代表的發(fā)展中國家應(yīng)當(dāng)靈活運(yùn)用TRIPs協(xié)議中的彈性條款來完善傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的立法機(jī)制，以維護(hù)本國利益。一方面，應(yīng)該充分理解把握TRIPs協(xié)議中的彈性條款，另一方面應(yīng)積極參與TRIPs協(xié)議多邊談判。
[Abstract]:Traditional culture is an important part of human culture, which embodies the unique cultural characteristics of a nation or even a country. However, in the international scope, the intellectual property protection mechanism of traditional culture has not been established, the consciousness of intellectual property protection of traditional culture is weak, and the lack of legal mechanism. As a result, the cultural heritage of one country is improperly exploited and abused by other countries. Based on this, this paper puts forward the interests balance mechanism of traditional cultural intellectual property rights and domestic and international legislation while combing the legislative issues. The interests of developed and developing countries, the origin and other regions of traditional culture, the imbalanced interests of traditional cultural inheritors and editors and users should be solved urgently. The origin of traditional culture and the inheritor of traditional culture creation should actively seek the mechanism of balancing interests in order to maintain the origin of traditional culture and the spiritual and economic interests of inheritors. At the same time, attention should be paid to the connection between domestic law and international law, and how to balance the relationship between the international and domestic protection of intellectual property rights of traditional culture is one of the key points in formulating the legal protection mechanism of traditional culture. This is also the premise of establishing a good international protection system of traditional culture. For the legislative reconstruction of the international protection of traditional cultural intellectual property rights, this paper defines the basic concepts related to the intellectual property rights of traditional culture, and suggests that the legislative mechanism of combining private and public rights should be implemented in the aspect of legislative protection. On the one hand, protect the traditional culture in the field of intellectual property, on the other hand, protect the cultural rights of the traditional culture. In this paper, the flexible clause in international treaties is proposed to protect traditional culture, taking TRIPs as an example. Because the intellectual property protection of traditional culture has not been added to the TRIPs agreement, it is necessary to find and apply the related clauses from the flexible clause. The developing countries represented by China should flexibly use the flexible clauses in the TRIPs Agreement to perfect the legislative mechanism of traditional cultural intellectual property rights in order to safeguard their own interests. On the one hand, we should fully understand and grasp the flexible clauses in the TRIPs agreement, on the other hand, we should actively participate in the multilateral negotiation of the TRIPs protocol.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃玉燁;戈光應(yīng);;非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)的法律保護(hù)模式[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

2 肖婷;劉華鋒;;透過TRIPS協(xié)議看傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)的國際保護(hù)[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年03期

3 鄭璇玉;;創(chuàng)新與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)——以小傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)為視角[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年12期

4 王太平;;我國傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)保護(hù)立法的行動(dòng)策略[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年11期

5 曲鴻亮,管寧;傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代——日本的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)和傳統(tǒng)文化保護(hù)[J];福建論壇(經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)版);2003年08期

6 黃玉燁;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)利益衡量論——兼論后TRIPs時(shí)代知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國際保護(hù)的新發(fā)展[J];法商研究;2004年05期

7 黃玉燁;;保護(hù)傳統(tǒng)文化的政策目標(biāo)論綱[J];法商研究;2008年01期

8 曹新明;;非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)模式研究[J];法商研究;2009年02期

9 程慧釗;民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)若干法律問題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年05期

10 嚴(yán)永和;;現(xiàn)行專利法對(duì)我國少數(shù)民族傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)的保護(hù)——論我國少數(shù)民族傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)的在先技術(shù)化[J];貴州民族研究;2006年06期

本文編號(hào)：1890456