本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán) + 反壟斷法�。� 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)作為一項(xiàng)合法壟斷權(quán),在市場競爭中有重要作用,其同規(guī)制競爭的反壟斷法有千絲萬縷的關(guān)系,處理好在兩者交叉領(lǐng)域產(chǎn)生的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷豁免問題對保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與維護(hù)競爭秩序都具有重要意義。以美歐為代表的國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷豁免制度發(fā)展較早,國際統(tǒng)一反壟斷規(guī)則中也有相關(guān)規(guī)定,對其進(jìn)行比較研究,認(rèn)識其中存在問題,對完善我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷豁免問題解決機(jī)制有借鑒意義。 反壟斷法因知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的特殊性,以及兩者對社會整體利益、總體公平與效率的共同追求而給予知識產(chǎn)權(quán)以豁免,但又由于反壟斷法與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)之間固然存在的沖突可能性而對這種豁免加以限制,防止不正當(dāng)行使知識產(chǎn)權(quán)可能產(chǎn)生反競爭效果,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷豁免問題由此產(chǎn)生。為解決這個問題,國際統(tǒng)一反壟斷法以及各國家和地區(qū)的反壟斷法及其適用規(guī)則都進(jìn)行了探索,而將反壟斷法統(tǒng)一適用于含知識產(chǎn)權(quán)在內(nèi)的一國所有經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域,然后根據(jù)社會公共利益、公平效率的考慮對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)正當(dāng)行使實(shí)施豁免的模式漸趨被廣泛接受,得到美歐日等多數(shù)國家的采用。 在我國對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷豁免問題的處理方面,2008年出臺的《反壟斷法》第55條使我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷問題的處理終于擺脫了無專門法律條文的尷尬處境,但此條文原則性過強(qiáng),缺乏具體操作性。未來對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷豁免問題處理機(jī)制的完善應(yīng)該以豐富《反壟斷法》第55條為中心,解決好我國作為發(fā)展中國家利用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)政策維護(hù)本國利益的立場問題、繼續(xù)有限制的加強(qiáng)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的同時,發(fā)展第55條的內(nèi)涵與外延,豐富條文內(nèi)容的基礎(chǔ)上配置具體操作指南以增強(qiáng)我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷豁免問題解決機(jī)制的實(shí)效。具體措施應(yīng)包含確立“統(tǒng)一使用,例外豁免”的模式、設(shè)立專門主管機(jī)構(gòu)等,同時還應(yīng)在內(nèi)容與形式方面都與國際統(tǒng)一反壟斷規(guī)則相接軌,參與到規(guī)則的制定中維護(hù)本國利益。
[Abstract]:As a legal monopoly right, intellectual property rights play an important role in market competition. It is of great significance to protect intellectual property rights and maintain competition order to deal with the problem of antitrust immunity of intellectual property right in the two intersecting fields. The anti-monopoly exemption system of intellectual property rights of the countries represented by the United States and Europe developed earlier. There are also relevant provisions in the international uniform anti-monopoly rules. It can be used for reference to improve the anti-monopoly exemption mechanism of intellectual property rights in China. Due to the particularity of intellectual property rights and the common pursuit of the interests of the whole society, the overall fairness and efficiency, the anti-monopoly law has granted immunity to intellectual property rights. However, due to the possibility of conflict between anti-monopoly law and intellectual property, the immunity is restricted to prevent the improper exercise of intellectual property, which may have anti-competitive effect, and the issue of anti-monopoly immunity of intellectual property. In order to solve this problem, the international unified anti-monopoly law, the anti-monopoly law of various countries and regions and its applicable rules have been explored, and the anti-monopoly law has been applied to all economic fields of a country including intellectual property rights. Then according to the social public interest, the fair efficiency consideration to the intellectual property right proper exercise immunity pattern gradually is widely accepted, has been adopted by the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries. In the aspect of dealing with the issue of anti-monopoly exemption of intellectual property rights in our country, Article 55 of the Anti-monopoly Law issued in 2008 has finally got rid of the embarrassing situation that there are no special legal provisions on the issue of anti-monopoly of intellectual property rights in China, but this provision is too principled. Lack of concrete operation. In the future, the improvement of the mechanism to deal with the issue of anti-monopoly exemption of intellectual property rights in China should focus on enriching Article 55 of the Anti-monopoly Law to solve the problem of our country's position of using intellectual property policies to safeguard its own interests as a developing country. While we continue to strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights, we should develop the connotation and extension of Article 55 and configure specific operating guidelines on the basis of enriching the contents of the articles in order to enhance the effectiveness of the mechanism for solving the problem of anti-monopoly immunity of intellectual property rights in China. The concrete measures should include establishing the mode of "uniform use, exceptional exemption", establishing special competent agencies, and so on. At the same time, the concrete measures should be in line with international uniform antitrust rules in content and form, and participate in the formulation of rules to safeguard the interests of their own countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1;D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王先林;關(guān)注知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題[J];安徽科技;2004年03期

2 喬生;中國限制外國企業(yè)對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的立法思考[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年01期

3 王先林;仲春;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域反壟斷的國際視角——《競爭政策與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行使》介評[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年05期

4 齊虹麗;;例外與豁免:中國《反壟斷法》適用除外之觀察[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

5 漆多俊;中國反壟斷立法問題研究[J];法學(xué)評論;1997年04期

6 繆劍文,劉恮;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與競爭法[J];法學(xué);1999年06期

7 王曉曄;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為的反壟斷法規(guī)制[J];法學(xué);2004年03期

8 邢鋼;;《反壟斷法》對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法實(shí)施的影響[J];法制與社會;2009年16期

9 張紫薇;孫武斌;;從微軟壟斷案看反壟斷法對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的法律規(guī)制[J];西北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年03期

10 陳俊;吳墨;;微軟反壟斷案給我們留下的啟示[J];國際市場;2008年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李小瑞;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的反壟斷豁免[D];中國政法大學(xué);2004年

2 張倩;豁免制度與反壟斷法價值論析[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1889371