本文選題：國際 + 原子能��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：國際原子能法可否作為國際法一個分支來研究?這個問題還沒有一個確切的答案。核能利用自1945年始用于軍事,在科技發(fā)展史上僅經(jīng)歷六十多年,卻已引起人類對安全的憂慮,同時也看到能源的希望。人類在削減核武器和防范核擴散的努力中,謹慎而又無可阻擋地推動核能和平利用來造福社會。核能利用對軍事實力、國際形勢、科技發(fā)展和工業(yè)應(yīng)用所帶來的革命性影響超過目前其它技術(shù)應(yīng)用可能達到的水平�？萍几锩蛧H形勢發(fā)展迫切需要建立新的國際規(guī)則來迎接新的機遇和挑戰(zhàn)。建立這個規(guī)則的需求從聯(lián)合國成立之初就成為熱點問題,最初成果就是聯(lián)合國原子能委員會的登場。而核能規(guī)制相關(guān)國際法律從上個世紀50年代末開始,不斷地提醒世界各國在戰(zhàn)爭與和平,發(fā)展與安全的選擇下,該如何對待核能這個充滿魅力同時又帶來危險感的新技術(shù)。五十多年來,具有廣泛影響力的《不擴散核武器條約》、《全面禁止核試驗條約》和《核安全條約》等五十多個核能利用相關(guān)國際條約陸續(xù)締結(jié),還有大量的核能雙邊協(xié)議、國際核安全標準和導(dǎo)則等文件接踵誕生,人類對核能利用的規(guī)制持續(xù)不斷,以應(yīng)對不斷產(chǎn)生的新的問題。 本文試圖從國際法的角度,對整個核能利用的國際法律制度,以“國際原子能法”的命名,做一次嘗試性、框架性的研究。全文按總、分結(jié)構(gòu),從內(nèi)涵的分析和到外延的展示,勾畫出國際原子能法的基本輪廓。 導(dǎo)論部分是對本文命題的詮釋。提出命題,闡述現(xiàn)狀,表明思路,規(guī)劃結(jié)構(gòu),同時預(yù)示本項研究的理論創(chuàng)新和現(xiàn)實意義。 總則包括漸進展開的四章。第一章從核科技概念的引入到社會意義上核能利用國際關(guān)系的展開,權(quán)衡核能利用的利與弊,希望與困惑,收益與風(fēng)險,說明核能利用國際關(guān)系是極具戰(zhàn)略意義的國際社會關(guān)系。第二章從傳統(tǒng)的國際法研究維度將國際原子能法概念分化解讀,分別闡述其定義、淵源、特點和原則、制定和實施。繼而與其它國際法的分支法相比較,結(jié)合上述屬性,提出將國際原子能法作為國際法的分支法研究的理論依據(jù)。第三章是對國際原子能法的法律主體進行解析,除了明確國家的權(quán)力、義務(wù)和責(zé)任,著重分析國際組織和“人”的主體特殊性。第四章是對本文選題之回應(yīng),提出國際原子能法三分法的框架結(jié)構(gòu),即國際原子能組織法、國際核不擴散法和國際核能和平利用法的分類方式。并對國際原子能法研究對象進行概要介紹。 分則系平行獨立的三章,第五章到第七章分別對國際原子能組織法、國際核不擴散法和國際核能和平利用法的構(gòu)成、定義、子目和重要核能國際法律的概要介紹,將國際原子能法的分類展示清楚。結(jié)論得出:法律界應(yīng)當建立和完善國際原子能法的國際法學(xué)研究。 本文的兩個附件是國際原子能法條約列表和國際原子能法相關(guān)大事記,直觀介紹該領(lǐng)域的國際法律總括和歷史進程。
[Abstract]:Can the International Atomic Energy Law be studied as a branch of international law? There is no exact answer to this question. The use of nuclear energy has been used since 1945, only more than 60 years in the history of science and technology, but it has caused concern for human security and the hope of energy. Human beings are cutting nuclear weapons and preventing nuclear proliferation. The revolutionary impact of nuclear energy on military strength, the international situation, the development of science and technology and industrial applications is more revolutionary than the possible levels of other technology applications. The technological revolution and international development are urgently needed to establish new international rules. To meet new opportunities and challenges, the demand for this rule has become a hot issue at the beginning of the founding of the United Nations. The initial result was the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission, which began in the late 50s of last century, constantly reminding the countries of the world in the choice of war and peace, development and security. For more than fifty years, more than 50 international nuclear energy use related treaties, such as the Treaty on the non proliferation of nuclear weapons, the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and the nuclear safety treaty, have been concluded in succession, and there are a large number of bilateral agreements on nuclear energy and international nuclear safety standards. And guidelines and other documents came into being. The regulation of the use of nuclear energy by human beings continued to cope with new problems.
This article attempts to make a tentative and framework study on the international legal system of the whole nuclear energy utilization and the naming of the "International Atomic Energy Law" from the perspective of international law. The text outlines the basic outline of the International Atomic Energy Law in accordance with the general and sub structure, from the analysis of the connotation and to the display of the extension.
The introduction is the interpretation of the proposition. It puts forward the proposition, expounds the present situation, indicates the train of thought and the planning structure, and predicts the theoretical and practical significance of the research.
The general principle includes four chapters. The first chapter, from the introduction of the concept of nuclear science and technology to the social significance of nuclear energy use international relations, weighs the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy utilization, hopes and puzzles, profits and risks, and shows that the international relations of nuclear energy use is a very strategic international social relationship. The second chapter is from the traditional international law research dimension. The definition, the origin, the characteristics and the principles of the International Atomic Energy Law are interpreted and interpreted respectively. Then, it is compared with the branch law of other international laws, and combines the above attributes, and puts forward the theoretical basis for the study of the International Atomic Energy Law as a branch of international law. The third chapter is the legal subject of the International Atomic Energy Law. In addition to defining the powers, obligations and responsibilities of the state, the analysis focuses on the analysis of the subject particularity of the international organization and the "man". The fourth chapter is the response to the topic of this article, and puts forward the framework of the International Atomic Energy Law (IAEA), namely the International Atomic Energy Organization Law, the international nuclear non-proliferation law and the international nuclear and flat profit usage. The research object of atomic energy method is briefly introduced.
The sub rules are parallel and independent three chapters, and the fifth to the seventh chapter respectively introduces the International Atomic Energy Organization Law, the international nuclear non-proliferation law and the international nuclear energy and the use of nuclear energy, the definition, sublist and the international law of nuclear energy. The classification of International Atomic Energy Law is clearly demonstrated. The conclusion is that the legal community should establish and improve the international original. The international jurisprudential study of the law of sub energy.
The two annex of this article is the list of International Atomic Energy Law Treaties and international atomic energy law related memorabilia.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D999.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張帥梁;;論相對國家主權(quán)在國際法上的地位[J];安陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年03期

2 石強;張箭;;論蘇聯(lián)解體后的“核遺產(chǎn)”及核擴散危機[J];東北亞論壇;2008年04期

3 岳漢景;;俄羅斯的核威懾政策[J];東北亞論壇;2009年05期

4 郭鮮花;關(guān)于全球核恐怖的國際討論會[J];輻射防護通訊;2002年01期

5 Abel J.González,王恒德;輻射安全標準及其應(yīng)用:國際政策和面臨的問題[J];輻射防護通訊;2005年Z1期

6 嚴安琪;;淺析1974年核試驗案的國際法規(guī)則[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2010年05期

7 潘自強;加強輻射防護的基礎(chǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)[J];輻射防護;1996年03期

8 余民才;;“打擊核恐怖主義全球倡議”的背景分析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年06期

9 江國青;;論國際法的主體結(jié)構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)家;2003年05期

10 戴軼;;試論安理會授權(quán)使用武力的法律規(guī)制[J];法學(xué)評論;2008年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔡先鳳;核損害民事責(zé)任研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1879975