本文選題：聯(lián)合國海洋法公約 + 附件七仲裁�。� 參考：《浙江大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：附件七強制仲裁是《聯(lián)合國海洋法公約》的強制爭端解決程序之一,也是一種兜底的管轄方式,除公約中規(guī)定的限制與例外,締約國不可以任意排除仲裁法庭的強制管轄,并且滿足一定條件時爭端國可以單方面提起附件七仲裁。由于其強制性和單方意志性,附件七仲裁成為廣泛應用的海洋爭端解決程序之一。2013年1月菲律賓將其與中國在南海的爭端單方提交附件七仲裁庭仲裁,2016年7月附件七仲裁庭對菲律賓單方就中菲南海爭端提起的強制仲裁程序做出最終裁決,整個案件持續(xù)三年之久。不僅引發(fā)中國輿論的廣泛關(guān)注,也使世界的目光聚焦中國南海。本文嘗試從中菲南海仲裁案入手,分析附件七強制仲裁制度的設計缺陷。本文主體由四個部分構(gòu)成。第一部分簡單介紹了中菲南海仲裁案的經(jīng)過及爭端雙方的訴求與態(tài)度,引入了附件七仲裁的概念。第二部詳細分析附件七仲裁的性質(zhì)、特征、適用的前提,為接下來的論證作鋪墊。第三部分著重就附件七強制仲裁制度的設計缺陷進行分析說明,闡述了附件七仲裁在涉及領土主權(quán)判定上的標準模糊、"交換意見"的判斷標準模糊、缺席仲裁制度導致公平性缺失等問題,同時說明中菲南海仲裁案得以在仲裁法庭進行最終裁決的原因就是強制仲裁制度的設計缺陷。最后,本文為今后中國面臨海洋爭端時的應對提出幾點構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:Annex VII compulsory arbitration is one of the compulsory dispute settlement procedures of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and is also a modus operandi. States parties may not arbitrarily exclude the compulsory jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, except for the limitations and exceptions provided for in the Convention, And when certain conditions are met, the dispute State may unilaterally initiate Annex VII arbitration. Because of its mandatory and unilateral will, Annex VII arbitration has become one of the widely used maritime dispute settlement procedures. In January 2013, the Philippines submitted its dispute with China in the South China Sea to the Annex VII Arbitration Tribunal, and in July 2016, the Annex VII Arbitration Tribunal singled out the Philippines on an ad hoc basis. The compulsory arbitration procedure initiated in the dispute over the Philippines and the South China Sea made the final decision. The whole case lasted for three years. It not only aroused the widespread concern of Chinese public opinion, but also made the eyes of the world focus on the South China Sea. This paper attempts to analyze the design defects of the mandatory arbitration system in Annex VII from the case of the South China Sea arbitration. The main body of this paper consists of four parts. The first part briefly introduces the process of the South China Sea arbitration case and the demands and attitudes of both parties to the dispute, and introduces the concept of Annex VII arbitration. The second part analyzes the nature, characteristics and applicable premise of Annex VII arbitration in detail, which paves the way for the following argumentation. The third part focuses on the analysis of the defects in the design of Annex VII compulsory arbitration system, expounds the ambiguity of the criteria of Annex VII arbitration concerning the determination of territorial sovereignty, and the ambiguity of the judgment criteria of "exchange of views". The absence of arbitration system leads to the lack of fairness and so on. At the same time, it explains that the reason why the arbitration case in the South China Sea can be decided in the arbitration court is the design defect of the compulsory arbitration system. Finally, this paper puts forward some ideas for China to deal with maritime disputes in the future.
【學位授予單位】：浙江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D993.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王佳;;從“北極日出號案”看國際海洋法法庭的缺席審判[J];大連海事大學學報(社會科學版);2015年06期

2 初北平;;國際商事仲裁視閾下的中菲南海仲裁案程序解讀[J];社會科學;2015年11期

3 劉衡;;《聯(lián)合國海洋法公約》附件七仲裁:定位、表現(xiàn)與問題——兼談對“南海仲裁案”的啟示[J];國際法研究;2015年05期

4 孫炳輝;;從歷史和法理看菲律賓提起南海爭端強制仲裁的非法性與非理性[J];當代世界;2013年08期

5 曹群;;南海爭端與國際仲裁:菲律賓之妄訴[J];國際問題研究;2013年04期

6 劉琳;;影響缺席判決模式選擇的制度因素探析[J];公民與法(法學版);2010年03期

，

本文編號：1879228