發(fā)布時間：2018-05-12 09:46

  本文選題：商標平行進口 + 商標法��； 參考：《浙江大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國加入WTO,涉及平行進口的案件會越來越多,不僅包括進口到我國被認定為平行進口的商品,也包括從我國出口到外國的商品被認定為平行進口商品。如何處理平行進口問題越來越受到關(guān)注。但是直到目前,國際上對于平行進口尚無統(tǒng)一的法律規(guī)定。在我國,除了《專利法》中“進口權(quán)”的規(guī)定排除了平行進口的合法性,包括《著作權(quán)法》和《商標法》在內(nèi)的有關(guān)法律都沒有對此做出明確規(guī)定,在理論上對待平行進口問題也存在不同觀點。文章主要從法學的角度對平行進口的基本概念及其基本理論問題進行了深入細致的剖析,并提出了作者自己的相應(yīng)觀點。 全文由引言和正文四章以及結(jié)語組成。引言主要從現(xiàn)實案例入手,闡明了選題的理由和意義、國內(nèi)研究現(xiàn)狀以及論文試圖做出的貢獻。第一章對商標平行進口及其表現(xiàn)形式進行理論上的界定。第二章對商標平行進口引發(fā)的與商標法和競爭法相沖突的問題進行理論上的研究；著重從競爭法的角度研究限制商標平行進口引發(fā)的與競爭法相沖突的問題,這是以往研究容易忽視的問題。第三章考察世界各國對待商標平行進口的法律立場(主要考察了美國、歐盟主要成員國家以及日本的基本立場)。第四章在對商標平行進口進行理論研究和對世界各國的法律立場考察的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了我國對待商標平行進口應(yīng)采取的立場與對策。結(jié)論則對本文的研究做了總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:With China's entry into WTO, there will be more and more cases involving parallel import, not only the goods imported to China are considered parallel imports, but also the goods exported from our country to foreign countries are regarded as parallel imports. How to deal with the problem of parallel import has been paid more and more attention. But until now, there is no uniform law on parallel import. In our country, except for the "right of import" in the Patent Law, the legality of parallel import is excluded, and the relevant laws, including the copyright Law and the Trademark Law, do not explicitly provide for this. There are different views on parallel import in theory. This paper analyzes the basic concept of parallel import and its basic theory from the point of view of law, and puts forward the author's own views. The full text consists of the introduction, four chapters and the conclusion. The preface mainly starts with the realistic case, clarifies the reason and significance of the topic, the present situation of domestic research and the contribution that the paper tries to make. The first chapter defines trademark parallel import and its manifestation in theory. The second chapter makes a theoretical study on the conflict between trademark parallel import and competition law, and focuses on the conflict between trademark parallel import and competition law from the point of view of competition law. This is a problem that is easy to ignore in previous studies. The third chapter examines the legal position of countries in the world on trademark parallel import (mainly examines the basic position of the United States, the main member countries of the European Union and Japan. On the basis of the theoretical research on trademark parallel import and the investigation of the legal position of the countries all over the world, the fourth chapter puts forward the position and countermeasures that our country should take in dealing with the trademark parallel import. The conclusion summarizes the research of this paper.
【學位授予單位】：浙江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 韋之;論不正當競爭法與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法的關(guān)系[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1999年06期

2 莫紀平,談建俊;商標權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的平行進口問題探析[J];當代法學;2000年02期

3 沈敏榮;WTO的貿(mào)易自由化與國際貿(mào)易法的發(fā)展[J];東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年02期

4 謝非;國際貿(mào)易中的商標平行進口法律問題研究[J];決策借鑒;2002年01期

5 吳漢東;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的私權(quán)與人權(quán)屬性——以《知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》與《世界人權(quán)公約》為對象[J];法學研究;2003年03期

6 趙西巨;歐盟法中的商標權(quán)權(quán)利窮竭原則[J];法學論壇;2003年02期

7 張今;平行進口法律問題研究[J];政法論壇;1999年03期

8 孫穎;平行進口與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護之沖突及其法律調(diào)控[J];政法論壇;1999年03期

，

本文編號：1878112