本文選題：非違法之訴 + 存在問(wèn)題　； 參考：《貴州民族大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著國(guó)際貿(mào)易的實(shí)踐活動(dòng)在國(guó)與國(guó)之間的展開(kāi)，為了有效地保護(hù)各成員方利益的平衡，防止WTO成員方違反在貿(mào)易談判中已達(dá)成的承諾，國(guó)際貿(mào)易的起草者設(shè)計(jì)出非違法之訴制度來(lái)維護(hù)成員方之間的貿(mào)易平衡。隨著其擔(dān)負(fù)的責(zé)任越來(lái)越重，WTO非違法之訴暴露的缺陷也越來(lái)越多。在規(guī)則方面，專(zhuān)家組對(duì)于“合理預(yù)期的利益”始終無(wú)法形成統(tǒng)一的解釋?zhuān)沟迷诜沁`法之訴中裁定“某一非違法措施是否造成了利益的喪失或損害”具有不同的評(píng)判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。在管轄范圍方面，，只要申訴方認(rèn)為其利益受損就適用非違法之訴，使得非違法之訴案件的管轄權(quán)不斷擴(kuò)大，存在被濫用的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。在實(shí)際可操作性方面，其對(duì)因果關(guān)系的舉證顯得較為復(fù)雜而困難，這增加了非違法之訴可操作性的難度。在國(guó)際貿(mào)易市場(chǎng)不斷的發(fā)展下，中國(guó)面臨著以美國(guó)為代表的西方列強(qiáng)試圖通過(guò)非違法之訴來(lái)解決人民幣匯率爭(zhēng)端的問(wèn)題，從WTO非違法之訴申訴方的主體、行為內(nèi)容和舉證責(zé)任角度，在非違法之訴內(nèi)解決我國(guó)人民幣匯率問(wèn)題是不合法的，構(gòu)建我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)非違法之訴機(jī)制的體系顯得十分有必要。
[Abstract]:With the practice of international trade between countries and countries, in order to effectively protect the balance of members of Fang Liyi and prevent WTO members from violating the commitments that have been reached in the trade negotiations, the drafters of international trade have designed a non illegal litigation system to maintain the trade balance between the members of Fang Zhi. In terms of rules, the expert group has always been unable to form a unified interpretation of "reasonably expected interests", making it possible to adjudication that "a non illegal measure has caused loss or damage to the interests of a non illegal measure" in a non illegal lawsuit. In the scope of the jurisdiction, the WTO has a different standard of judgment. As long as the complainant thinks that its interests are damaged, the non illegal action will be applied, which makes the jurisdiction of non illegal cases constantly expanding and the risk of being abused. In practical operability, the proof of the causal relation is more complicated and difficult, which increases the difficulty of the non illegal action. Under the development of China, the Western powers, represented by the United States, try to solve the issue of the RMB exchange rate dispute through non illegal action. From the perspective of the non illegal WTO complainant's main body, the behavior content and the burden of proof, it is illegal to solve the problem of the RMB exchange rate in the non illegal lawsuit. The system of the litigation mechanism is very necessary.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 左曉東;;WTO非違反之訴與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)政策[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2009年05期

2 謝崢;世貿(mào)組織中的“不違法之訴”[J];國(guó)際商務(wù).對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

3 龔宇;“不違法之訴”與WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

4 楊國(guó)華;WTO第一個(gè)非違反之訴——日本消費(fèi)膠卷和相紙案[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年05期

5 王海峰;;WTO非違約之訴制度研究——兼論我國(guó)對(duì)非違約之訴機(jī)制的利用[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2006年08期

6 易波;;WTO“利益”問(wèn)題探析:非違法之訴視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年12期

7 鄧露;;淺議GATT/WTO體制下的“非違約之訴”[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

8 楊衛(wèi)東;論WTO違法之訴中“抵消與損傷”推定的不可反證性[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

9 袁勇;;合法預(yù)期利益之訴初論——以WTO非違法之訴為鑒[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

10 孫連鐘;劉秋東;;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制中非違反之訴適用要件的分析[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2007年25期

本文編號(hào)：1873618