本文選題：鹿特丹規(guī)則 + 權利轉讓�。� 參考：《西南政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：歷時十幾年的《全部或部分海上國際貨物運輸合同公約》被稱為《鹿特丹規(guī)則》已于2008年12月11日在聯(lián)合國第63屆大會最終通過,并于2009年9月23日在荷蘭鹿特丹舉行了簽字儀式。權利轉讓制度是《鹿特丹規(guī)則》較其之前的三個國際海上貨物運輸領域已經(jīng)生效的國際公約新增加的一項法律制度。該制度的設立,對于澄清運輸與貿(mào)易之間的聯(lián)系,協(xié)調(diào)運輸法律與貿(mào)易法律之間的沖突,具有重大的理論和現(xiàn)實意義。有鑒于此,本文將針對國際海上貨物運輸中的權利轉讓制度涉及的系列問題展開討論。 全文共分為五個部分,三萬余字。 第一部分“緒論”主要介紹了權利轉讓制度的由來以及其存在的研究價值。筆者從英國《1855年提單法》到1922年制定的《海上貨物運輸法》再到《鹿特丹規(guī)則》這個歷史脈絡的角度分析了權利轉讓問題的由來。通過具體的案例分析提出了其存在的重大現(xiàn)實意義。 第二部分“權利轉讓中基本概念剖析”。在這一部分中,筆者通過對權利轉讓涵義和提單持有人概念的界定,對提單債權關系的重要性和有關其性質(zhì)的主要學說進行了系統(tǒng)的闡述,且分析了各學說的優(yōu)弊,最后得出了自己的觀點。 第三部分“權利轉讓的規(guī)則”。在這一部分,筆者先是分析了權利轉讓的立法例,即權利義務轉讓異步型和權利義務轉讓同步型,然后從權利轉讓的成立和生效要件兩個方面分析了《鹿特丹規(guī)則》中權利轉讓的具體時間。 第四部分“權利轉讓的內(nèi)容”。該部分是本文的重點也是本文論述的難點,筆者通過對條文的具體分析肯定了“可轉讓的權利”包括“提貨權”和“控制權”,接著闡述了這兩種權利的具體內(nèi)容。再通過對學說上存在的“可轉讓的權利”還包括“物權”和“訴權”的觀點進行了分析,得出了自己的觀點即《鹿特丹規(guī)則》中“可轉讓的權利”只包括“提貨權”和“控制權”。 第五部分“《鹿特丹規(guī)則》中權利轉讓制度對我國的借鑒意義”。在這一部分,筆者通過對我國《海商法》和《合同法》等法律關于權利轉讓問題規(guī)定的分析,得出了我國對該問題的立法現(xiàn)狀。在此基礎上,對我國《海商法》的修訂提出了幾點供參考的建議。 在研究方法上,本文主要運用了歷史分析方法、比較法和實證分析法。在關于權利轉讓問題的由來的論述上,筆者采用了歷史分析方法對這段歷史發(fā)展進行了客觀的總結和分析,這有助于更加深入地解析權利轉讓法律問題的內(nèi)涵。由于權利轉讓問題和債的轉移、票據(jù)流通存在諸多相似點,加上英美等國對權利轉讓問題的規(guī)定較為成熟,因此本文的行文過程中較多運用了比較分析方法進行論述,以便借鑒其中成熟的理論和先進的成果應用于我國對此問題的研究和立法實踐。海商法是一門實踐性較強的學科,因而筆者對國際海上貨物運輸中涉及權利轉讓問題的典型案例進行了分析和總結。
[Abstract]:The Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods by Sea, which lasted for more than ten years, was finally adopted by the 63rd United Nations General Assembly on December 11, 2008, as the Rotterdam rules. A signing ceremony was held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on September 23, 2009. The transfer of rights system is a new legal system added to the Rotterdam rules compared with the three international conventions in force in the field of international carriage of goods by sea. The establishment of this system is of great theoretical and practical significance to clarify the relationship between transport and trade and to coordinate the conflict between transport law and trade law. In view of this, this paper will discuss a series of issues concerning the transfer of rights regime in the international carriage of goods by sea. The full text is divided into five parts, more than 30,000 words. The first part "introduction" mainly introduces the origin of the right transfer system and its existence research value. The author analyzes the origin of the transfer of rights from the perspective of the British Bill of Lading Act of 1855 to the Law on the Carriage of goods by Sea formulated in 1922 and to the Rotterdam rules. Through the concrete case analysis, it puts forward the great practical significance of its existence. The second part: analysis of the basic concepts in the transfer of rights. In this part, by defining the meaning of transfer of rights and the concept of holder of bill of lading, the author systematically expounds the importance of the creditor's rights relationship of bill of lading and the main theories about its nature, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of each theory. Finally, the author came to his own point of view. Part III "rules on the transfer of Rights". In this part, the author first analyzes the legislative example of the transfer of rights, that is, the asynchronous transfer of rights and obligations and the synchronous transfer of rights and obligations. Then the specific time of the transfer of rights in Rotterdam rules is analyzed from two aspects: the establishment and the effective requirements of the transfer of rights. The fourth part is the content of the transfer of rights. This part is the focal point of this article also is the difficulty which this article discusses, the author affirms "the transferable right" including "the right to pick up goods" and "the right of control" through the concrete analysis to the article, then elaborated the concrete content of these two kinds of rights. Through the analysis of the view that "transferable right" also includes "real right" and "right of action" in theory, The conclusion is that the "transferable right" in the Rotterdam rules includes only "right to pick up goods" and "right of control". Part five: the reference meaning of the transfer of Rights system in the Rotterdam rules to our country. In this part, through the analysis of the law of maritime law and contract law on the transfer of rights, the author obtains the current situation of legislation on this issue in our country. On this basis, some suggestions for the revision of Maritime Law of China are put forward. In the research method, this paper mainly uses the historical analysis method, the comparative method and the empirical analysis method. On the origin of the transfer of rights, the author uses the historical analysis method to sum up and analyze the historical development objectively, which is helpful to analyze the connotation of the legal issue of the transfer of rights. Due to the problem of transfer of rights and the transfer of debt, there are many similarities in negotiable instruments circulation, and the provisions on the transfer of rights in Britain and America are more mature, so the comparative analysis method is used in the course of this paper. In order to draw lessons from the mature theory and advanced achievements in our research and legislative practice. Maritime law is a practical subject, so the author analyzes and summarizes the typical cases involving the transfer of rights in the international carriage of goods by sea.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.19

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 姚瑩;;國際海上貨物運輸中的權利轉讓問題研究——以UNCITRAL《運輸法公約(草案)》為視角[J];當代法學;2008年03期

2 司玉琢;UNCITRAL運輸法(草案)難點問題研究[J];大連海事大學學報(社會科學版);2003年01期

3 董翠香;論票據(jù)權利的背書轉讓[J];河北法學;2002年05期

4 吳煦;;提單之債性質(zhì)研究[J];昆明理工大學學報(社會科學版);2007年07期

5 孫朋;;簡論UNCITRAL運輸法草案中的權利轉讓[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2006年09期

6 李學蘭;論提單權利證券化[J];法學論壇;2002年06期

7 王艷玲,王應富;海上貨物運輸合同下托運人訴權問題探究[J];中國海商法年刊;1998年00期

8 司玉琢,汪杰,祝默泉,沈曉平;關于無單放貨的理論與實踐——兼論提單的物權性問題[J];中國海商法年刊;2000年00期

9 李志文;論提單持有人及其權利、義務和責任[J];中國海商法年刊;2001年00期

10 鄔先江,陳海波;論CMI運輸法草案有關控制權的規(guī)定[J];中國海商法年刊;2001年00期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 謝靜;國際海上貨物運輸中提單轉讓法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學;2004年

2 李曉麗;提單轉讓相關法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1872309