本文選題：傳統(tǒng)資源 + 傳統(tǒng)資源權(quán)��； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)代知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際保護(hù)的變革面臨著嶄新制度的突破,如傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)、遺傳資源保護(hù)制度。在保護(hù)今天的各種智力創(chuàng)作與創(chuàng)造之“流”時(shí),人們?cè)谙喈?dāng)長(zhǎng)的時(shí)間里忽略了對(duì)它們的“源”的傳統(tǒng)資源的保護(hù),發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家與發(fā)展中國(guó)家實(shí)際上在“源”上的智力成果與在“流”上的智力成果的沖突日益明顯。 然而,隨著國(guó)際貿(mào)易不斷的發(fā)展,面對(duì)上述沖突,人們?nèi)找嬲J(rèn)識(shí)到保護(hù)傳統(tǒng)資源的重要性,但由于國(guó)際社會(huì)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)資源的概念界定、本質(zhì)分析等研究缺乏共識(shí),因此關(guān)于對(duì)“傳統(tǒng)資源”的保護(hù)對(duì)象、保護(hù)具體內(nèi)容,相關(guān)具體程序等問(wèn)題達(dá)成基本的一致認(rèn)識(shí)�；谶@一現(xiàn)狀,筆者試圖從“傳統(tǒng)資源”入手,通過(guò)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)資源、傳統(tǒng)資源權(quán)、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的概念、特性、本質(zhì)的分析,得出造成上述兩者沖突的原因所在,并深入分析沖突的實(shí)質(zhì),最終提出協(xié)調(diào)傳統(tǒng)資源權(quán)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的更充分的方案。 通過(guò)分析,筆者主要得出以下兩個(gè)結(jié)論：第一,傳統(tǒng)資源權(quán)不屬于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),而是一種獨(dú)立于現(xiàn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的一種權(quán)利體系。第二,傳統(tǒng)資源權(quán)屬于人權(quán)的一種,其同知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的沖突,實(shí)質(zhì)上為人權(quán)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的沖突。通過(guò)上述兩個(gè)結(jié)論,筆者認(rèn)為,傳統(tǒng)資源權(quán)概念的提出,是完全突破了現(xiàn)行的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)模式的一種全新的術(shù)語(yǔ),其不再僅僅局限于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的體系中,而是從人權(quán)的高度,來(lái)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)資源的保護(hù)提供另外一種更全面的保護(hù)思路。
[Abstract]:The contemporary international protection of intellectual property rights is faced with a new system of breakthrough, such as traditional knowledge, genetic resources protection system. In protecting the "flow" of today's intellectual creation and creation, people have for quite a long time neglected the protection of their "source" of traditional resources. The conflict between developed and developing countries' intellectual achievements in "source" and "flow" is becoming more and more obvious. However, with the continuous development of international trade, in the face of these conflicts, people are increasingly aware of the importance of protecting traditional resources. However, there is a lack of consensus in the international community on the conceptual definition of traditional resources and essential analysis. Therefore, the basic consensus is reached on the protection object, the concrete content and the relevant concrete procedure of the "traditional resources". Based on this situation, the author tries to start with "traditional resources", through the analysis of the concept, characteristics and essence of traditional resources, traditional resource rights, intellectual property rights, the reasons for the conflict between the two are obtained. The essence of the conflict is analyzed in depth, and a more sufficient scheme to coordinate traditional resource rights and intellectual property rights is put forward. Through analysis, the author draws the following two conclusions: first, the traditional resource rights are not intellectual property rights, but an independent of the current intellectual property system of a right system. Second, the traditional resource right belongs to one kind of human rights, its conflict with intellectual property rights is essentially the conflict between human rights and intellectual property rights. Through the above two conclusions, the author thinks that the concept of traditional resource right is a completely new term that breaks through the current intellectual property model, which is not only confined to the system of intellectual property, but also from the height of human rights. To provide a more comprehensive approach to the protection of traditional resources.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡麗君;傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)[J];中華商標(biāo);2003年09期

2 齊愛(ài)民;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)框架下的非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)及其保護(hù)[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

3 李靜;;淺析民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)作品的法律保護(hù)[J];重慶郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

4 楊明,肖志遠(yuǎn);知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán):后TRIPS時(shí)代的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際保護(hù)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

5 張建邦;生物基因資源獲取和利益分享的國(guó)際法規(guī)制──兼論對(duì)我國(guó)基因資源保護(hù)的啟示[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

6 宋紅松;傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年03期

7 周方;傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)法律概念初探[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年08期

8 梅術(shù)文;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與自主創(chuàng)新關(guān)系的檢視與思考[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年06期

9 周勝生;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際保護(hù)制度的擴(kuò)張趨勢(shì)及我國(guó)的應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年10期

10 曾麗凌;肖平;;傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)保護(hù)——法律領(lǐng)域之新課題[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1843380