本文選題：破產(chǎn)域外效力 + 管轄權(quán)分配制度��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代社會在迅猛發(fā)展的科學(xué)技術(shù)和社會生產(chǎn)力的不斷推動下,進入了一個全球經(jīng)濟一體化進一步縱深發(fā)展的時代。然而,在經(jīng)濟全球化帶動各國經(jīng)濟和全球經(jīng)濟飛速發(fā)展的同時,隨著跨界貿(mào)易和投資的日益頻繁,跨界破產(chǎn)案件日益增多。尤其是自2008年全球金融危機爆發(fā)以來,全球經(jīng)濟進入大蕭條時期,一大批知名跨國企業(yè)遭受重創(chuàng),紛紛不得已宣告破產(chǎn),跨界破產(chǎn)案件因此俱增,跨界破產(chǎn)問題也因此被推上了風(fēng)口浪尖。 跨界破產(chǎn)案件首先需要解決的問題就是管轄權(quán)的分配問題,因為跨界破產(chǎn)案件的管轄權(quán)是啟動跨界破產(chǎn)程序的前提,也是跨界破產(chǎn)程序啟動后得以順利開展的重要保障,還是跨界破產(chǎn)程序能夠得到相關(guān)國家承認與協(xié)助的關(guān)鍵所在。針對跨界破產(chǎn)案件的管轄權(quán),2002年5月31日生效的《歐盟破產(chǎn)程序規(guī)則》建立了一套比較完善的分配制度,該制度在歐盟境內(nèi)得到了廣泛應(yīng)用,體現(xiàn)出無可比擬的優(yōu)越性,當然也不可避免地在一些跨界破產(chǎn)案件中彰顯出某些局限性,這些優(yōu)越性和局限性都是各國尤其是我國的跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)分配立法所應(yīng)借鑒的。因此,研究歐盟境內(nèi)跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)的分配制度具有十分重要的意義。 本文采用立法研究與案例分析相結(jié)合的方法,對歐盟境內(nèi)跨界破產(chǎn)的管轄權(quán)分配制度進行了深入探討,分析了其優(yōu)越性和局限性,從而為我國相關(guān)立法制度的建立和完善提供借鑒,以彌補我國在跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)分配制度方面的立法空白。 具體而言,本文在整體結(jié)構(gòu)上分為引言、正文和結(jié)論三部分,其中,正文部分共分四章:第一章首先介紹了跨界破產(chǎn)的概念和內(nèi)容,同時論述了跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)分配的重要性,然后通過分析跨界破產(chǎn)域外效力理論的歷史演進,指出歐盟境內(nèi)跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)分配制度的理論基礎(chǔ)是符合當代發(fā)展趨勢的修正普及主義;第二章是對歐盟境內(nèi)跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)分配制度的立法研究和司法研究,該章首先介紹了歐盟境內(nèi)跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)分配的統(tǒng)一立法,即《歐盟破產(chǎn)程序規(guī)則》的相關(guān)規(guī)定,然后對迄今為止歐盟歷史上規(guī)模最大的跨界破產(chǎn)案件即Parmalat集團公司破產(chǎn)案進行了介紹和分析;第三章在第二章的基礎(chǔ)上,著重分析了歐盟境內(nèi)跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)分配制度的核心概念,即“債務(wù)人主要利益中心”,該章通過對“債務(wù)人主要利益中心”現(xiàn)有確定標準及其不確定性的分析,對其概念內(nèi)涵、確定標準以及確定方法的進一步完善提出了建議;第四章首先對我國跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)分配的立法現(xiàn)狀進行考察,發(fā)現(xiàn)了我國在這一方面的立法空白,進而參考歐盟境內(nèi)跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)分配制度的優(yōu)越性和局限性,對我國跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)分配制度的建立和完善提出了自己的建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology and the continuous promotion of social productive forces, modern society has entered an era of further development of global economic integration. However, with the rapid development of economy and global economy driven by economic globalization, with the increasing frequency of cross-border trade and investment, cross-border bankruptcy cases are increasing day by day. Especially since the outbreak of the global financial crisis in 2008, the global economy has entered a period of Great Depression, a large number of well-known multinational enterprises have suffered heavy losses, have had to declare bankruptcy, cross-border bankruptcy cases have increased. The problem of cross-border bankruptcy has also been pushed to the forefront of the storm. The first problem to be solved in cross-border insolvency cases is the allocation of jurisdiction, because the jurisdiction of cross-border insolvency cases is the prerequisite for the commencement of cross-border insolvency proceedings and an important guarantee for the smooth development of cross-border insolvency proceedings after the commencement of cross-border insolvency proceedings. Is also the key to the cross-border insolvency proceedings can be recognized and assisted by the relevant States. In view of the jurisdiction of cross-border bankruptcy cases, the EU bankruptcy procedure rules, which came into effect on May 31, 2002, have established a relatively perfect distribution system, which has been widely used in the European Union and has shown unparalleled superiority. Of course, it is inevitable to show some limitations in some cross-border bankruptcy cases. These advantages and limitations should be used for reference by all countries, especially our country's legislation on the distribution of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the distribution system of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in the EU. In this paper, the method of combining legislative research with case analysis is used to probe into the jurisdiction distribution system of cross-border bankruptcy in the European Union, and its advantages and limitations are analyzed. In order to provide reference for the establishment and perfection of relevant legislative system in our country, in order to make up for the legislative gaps in the distribution system of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in our country. Specifically, the whole structure of this paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. Among them, the text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter introduces the concept and content of cross-border bankruptcy, and discusses the importance of the distribution of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction. Then by analyzing the historical evolution of the theory of extraterritorial effect of cross-border bankruptcy, it is pointed out that the theoretical basis of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction distribution system in the EU is the revised populism in line with the contemporary development trend. The second chapter is the legislative research and judicial research on the distribution system of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in the European Union. This chapter first introduces the uniform legislation on the distribution of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in the European Union, that is, the relevant provisions of the rules on bankruptcy procedure of the European Union. Then it introduces and analyzes the largest cross-border bankruptcy case in the history of the European Union, that is, the bankruptcy case of Parmalat Group Company. Chapter three is based on the second chapter. Focusing on the analysis of the core concept of the distribution system of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in the European Union, that is, "centre of main interests of the debtor", through an analysis of the existing criteria for the determination of "centre of main interests of the debtor" and its uncertainty, Some suggestions are put forward on the connotation of the concept, the standard of determination and the further improvement of the method. Chapter four first investigates the current situation of legislation on the distribution of jurisdiction over cross-border bankruptcy in China, and finds the legislative gaps in this respect in our country. Furthermore, referring to the advantages and limitations of the cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction distribution system in the EU, the author puts forward some suggestions for the establishment and improvement of the cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction distribution system in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 湯維建;論國際破產(chǎn)[J];比較法研究;1995年02期

2 張玲;;美國跨界破產(chǎn)立法三十年及其對中國的啟示[J];武大國際法評論;2009年01期

3 張玲;跨國破產(chǎn)國際合作趨勢研究[J];政法論壇;2003年04期

4 張玲;;歐盟跨界破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)制度的創(chuàng)新與發(fā)展——“主要利益中心”標準在歐盟適用的判例研究[J];政法論壇;2009年02期

5 石靜遐;中國的跨界破產(chǎn)法:現(xiàn)狀、問題及發(fā)展[J];中國法學(xué);2002年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張玲;跨境破產(chǎn)合作中的國際私法問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭海瑞;跨國公司集團破產(chǎn)的管轄權(quán)問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1837435