本文選題：外層空間 + 爭端解決機制�。� 參考：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著人類科技的進步，外空活動日益頻繁。國家不再是外空活動的唯一主體，私人資本開始登上外空活動的舞臺。傳統(tǒng)以國家為中心的外空爭端解決機制不能滿足外空活動發(fā)展的需要。外空爭端解決機制亟待變革。本文將就外空爭端解決機制變革問題的方方面面進行詳細的分析與論證。 從理論角度來看，傳統(tǒng)的外空爭端解決機制不能適應(yīng)外層空間活動商業(yè)化和私營化的發(fā)展趨勢，且由于本身規(guī)定的不足亟待新的變革。研究外空爭端解決機制可能的變革方向，對各種理論進行系統(tǒng)的整理，有助于理清外空爭端解決機制發(fā)展的脈絡(luò)，找到最適合解決外空爭端的方法。常設(shè)仲裁法院的《外空活動爭端任擇性仲裁規(guī)則》為實現(xiàn)外空爭端解決機制的變革找到了突破口。但是國內(nèi)外學(xué)者對于這個問題重視不足。對此問題的一個全面研究有助于掌握常設(shè)仲裁法院解決外空爭端的法律機制，，同時能夠?qū)χ袊脟H仲裁解決外空爭端提出意見和建議。 從實踐角度來看，傳統(tǒng)的外空爭端解決機制由于規(guī)定的過于原則性，造成可操作性不強，這套機制運行50多年以來幾乎沒有被使用過（唯一的一個案例“宇宙954號案件”并沒有啟動其中具有法律性質(zhì)的求償委員會的程序）。而常設(shè)仲裁法院出臺的這套《仲裁規(guī)則》則具有實踐上的可操作性，研究這套《仲裁規(guī)則》有助于建立一套真正可被使用的外空爭端解決機制，并能夠有針對性的提出中國在面對這種情況所能夠選擇的對策。 本文將采取國際法研究領(lǐng)域中的多種研究方法，全面的分析傳統(tǒng)外空爭端解決機制，整理出外空爭端解決機制變革的方向并分析其合理性。在此基礎(chǔ)上研究常設(shè)仲裁法院建立的外空爭端解決機制，分析其法律基礎(chǔ)和運行模式。最后將就我國如何善用這套爭端解決機制以及如何參與外空爭端解決機制的變革提出自己的意見。 總的來說，常設(shè)仲裁法院通過的《外空活動爭端任擇性仲裁規(guī)則》是公平合理的解決外空爭端的有效手段。它不僅解決了傳統(tǒng)外空爭端解決機制以國家為唯一主體的弊端，同時兼顧了效率與公平。這一爭端解決機制值得我國廣大國際法學(xué)者與航天業(yè)從業(yè)者認真的研究與合理的應(yīng)用。
[Abstract]:With the progress of human science and technology, outer space activities become more and more frequent.The state is no longer the sole subject of outer space activities, and private capital is beginning to take place in outer space activities.The traditional state-centered dispute settlement mechanism for outer space cannot meet the needs of the development of outer space activities.The dispute settlement mechanism in outer space needs to be reformed.This paper will make detailed analysis and argumentation on all aspects of the reform of outer space dispute settlement mechanism.From a theoretical point of view, the traditional outer space dispute settlement mechanism can not adapt to the trend of commercialization and privatization of outer space activities, and needs new changes because of its own deficiencies.It is helpful to clarify the development of outer space dispute settlement mechanism and to find the most suitable way to settle the dispute in outer space by studying the possible change direction of outer space dispute settlement mechanism and systematically arranging various theories.The optional Arbitration rules for disputes in Outer Space activities of the permanent Court of Arbitration find a breakthrough for the reform of the dispute settlement mechanism in outer space.But domestic and foreign scholars pay less attention to this problem.A comprehensive study of this issue will help to grasp the legal mechanism of the permanent Court of Arbitration for the settlement of outer space disputes, and at the same time, it will be able to put forward opinions and suggestions on the use of international arbitration in the settlement of outer space disputes by China.From a practical point of view, the traditional dispute settlement mechanism for outer space is not operable because of its excessively principled nature.This mechanism has hardly been used in more than 50 years of operation (the only case, case Cosmos 954), did not initiate the proceedings of the claims Commission, which is of a legal nature.The set of arbitration rules issued by the permanent Court of Arbitration is practical and the study of the Arbitration rules is conducive to the establishment of a truly usable mechanism for the settlement of disputes in outer space.And can be targeted to put forward China in the face of this situation can choose the countermeasures.This paper will adopt a variety of research methods in the field of international law, analyze the traditional dispute settlement mechanism in outer space comprehensively, sort out the direction of the transformation of the dispute settlement mechanism in outer space and analyze its rationality.On this basis, this paper studies the outer space dispute settlement mechanism established by the permanent Court of Arbitration, and analyzes its legal basis and operation mode.Finally, we will put forward our own opinions on how to make good use of the dispute settlement mechanism and how to participate in the transformation of the outer space dispute settlement mechanism.In general, the optional Arbitration rules for disputes in Outer Space activities adopted by the permanent Court of Arbitration are an effective and fair means of resolving disputes in outer space.It not only solves the drawback of the traditional outer space dispute settlement mechanism that the state is the sole subject, but also gives consideration to the efficiency and fairness.This dispute settlement mechanism is worthy of our country's international law scholars and spaceflight practitioners to study and apply rationally.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D999.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 薄守省;;從美俄衛(wèi)星相撞事件看航天活動之損害賠償責(zé)任[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

2 李居遷;;合法性、合理性與后續(xù)問題——反衛(wèi)星實驗的法律問題[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年03期

3 薄守省;;外層空間法五大條約的現(xiàn)狀及面臨的挑戰(zhàn)[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

4 吳曉丹;;國際空間法的現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展趨勢[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年03期

5 高國柱;;論外空活動中的國家責(zé)任[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2008年04期

6 薄守省;;論私人也應(yīng)作為外空物體損害賠償?shù)呢?zé)任主體[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年03期

7 陳彬;;從“灰腳法庭”到現(xiàn)代常設(shè)仲裁機構(gòu)——追尋商事仲裁機構(gòu)發(fā)展的足跡[J];仲裁研究;2007年01期

8 李濱;趙海峰;;論外層空間活動爭端的解決機制[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年03期

9 尹玉海;制訂統(tǒng)一空間法規(guī)約是空間活動現(xiàn)代化的客觀要求[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 聶明巖;空間碎片爭端解決機制研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

2 王晶;空間活動商業(yè)化及其法律制度分析[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

3 孫傳玲;國際爭端解決機制多樣化帶來的國際法之不成體系化問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：1747987