本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用 + 國(guó)際貿(mào)易�。� 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用是指知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)人行使知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)超過了適當(dāng)限度,違反了法律規(guī)定或公共政策,主要表現(xiàn)為不合理地拒絕或限制他人使用其知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的各種行為。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用限制了技術(shù)成果的創(chuàng)新和傳播,擾亂了公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的國(guó)際市場(chǎng)秩序,其對(duì)國(guó)際貿(mào)易的扭曲和阻礙早已引起國(guó)際社會(huì)的廣泛關(guān)注與警惕:以WIPO為代表的各大國(guó)際組織很早就開始了規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的立法嘗試;TRIPs協(xié)定繼承并發(fā)展了之前眾多國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)公約的理念,明確了規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的基本原則,構(gòu)建了有一定拘束力的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用規(guī)制體系,并為WTO成員的相關(guān)國(guó)內(nèi)立法預(yù)留了很大空間。以美國(guó)和歐盟為代表的世界主要國(guó)家和地區(qū)則通過立法的不斷改革和案例的大量積累,形成了各自的規(guī)制原則和規(guī)則。我國(guó)2008年8月1日開始實(shí)施的《中華人民共和國(guó)反壟斷法》第55條亦對(duì)規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用做出了原則性規(guī)定,但由于該法的相關(guān)配套規(guī)章、條例尚不完備,與其他法律的銜接和協(xié)調(diào)仍處于摸索階段,因此尚有很大的完善空間。 本文從知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的本質(zhì)屬性入手,考察“知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用”的源起及其在國(guó)際法和各國(guó)法律中的不同含義,辨析相關(guān)易混淆概念,在厘清知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用基本內(nèi)涵的基礎(chǔ)上,審視其對(duì)國(guó)際貿(mào)易的危害,分析與解讀TRIPs協(xié)定等國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)公約中規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的相關(guān)條款,并以美國(guó)和歐盟為主要考察對(duì)象,主要運(yùn)用歷史分析和比較分析的研究方法,深入考察歐美相關(guān)制度的歷史沿革和發(fā)展趨勢(shì),結(jié)合典型案例,研究規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的主要法律原則和規(guī)則。最后,回顧《反壟斷法》通過前后我國(guó)規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的法律制度的發(fā)展變革,針對(duì)目前存在的主要問題,就如何建立一個(gè)與我國(guó)自身經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技發(fā)展水平相適應(yīng)的、完備而有效的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用法律規(guī)制體系提出一些有益、可行的建議。
[Abstract]:The abuse of intellectual property means that the intellectual property right is exercised by the intellectual property owner in excess of the appropriate limit, which violates the legal regulations or public policies, and is mainly manifested in various behaviors that unreasonably refuse or restrict others to use their intellectual property rights.The abuse of intellectual property rights limits the innovation and dissemination of technological achievements and disrupts the international market order of fair competition.Its distortion and hindrance to international trade have already aroused widespread concern and vigilance in the international community: the major international organizations, represented by WIPO, have long begun legislative attempts to regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights, and the trips Agreement has inherited and developed it.The ideas of many previous international intellectual property conventions,This paper clarifies the basic principles of regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights, constructs a binding system of regulation of abuse of intellectual property rights, and reserves a lot of space for the relevant domestic legislation of WTO members.The main countries and regions in the world, represented by the United States and the European Union, have formed their respective rules and regulations through the continuous reform of legislation and the accumulation of cases.Article 55 of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the people's Republic of China, which came into effect on August 1, 2008, also provides for the regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights in principle. However, due to the relevant supporting regulations of the law, the regulations are not complete.The connection and coordination with other laws are still in the groping stage, so there is still a lot of room for improvement.Starting with the essential attribute of intellectual property, this paper examines the origin of "abuse of intellectual property" and its different meanings in international law and other countries' laws, discriminates the relevant confusing concepts, and clarifies the basic connotation of abuse of intellectual property.This paper examines its harm to international trade, analyzes and interprets the relevant provisions of international intellectual property rights conventions such as the TRIPs Agreement to regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights, and takes the United States and the European Union as the main objects of investigation.By means of historical analysis and comparative analysis, this paper makes a thorough investigation of the historical evolution and development trend of the relevant institutions in Europe and the United States, and studies the main legal principles and rules governing the abuse of intellectual property rights in combination with typical cases.Finally, after reviewing the development and transformation of the legal system governing the abuse of intellectual property rights in China before and after the adoption of the Anti-monopoly Law, and in view of the main problems existing at present, how to establish a system suitable to the level of economic and scientific and technological development of our country,A complete and effective legal regulation system of intellectual property abuse is put forward some useful and feasible suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;D997.1;D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王先林;關(guān)注知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題[J];安徽科技;2004年03期

2 辛柏春;;TRIPS協(xié)定與國(guó)際貿(mào)易中的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)壁壘[J];北方法學(xué);2009年01期

3 李春華,付中強(qiáng);中德反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法之比較[J];商業(yè)研究;2005年06期

4 謝紅慧;歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法中的“必要設(shè)施原則”[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

5 沈木珠,解薇薇;中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的反壟斷立法思考——從中國(guó)企業(yè)面臨的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)危機(jī)談起[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

6 王曉曄;;關(guān)于我國(guó)反壟斷執(zhí)法機(jī)構(gòu)的幾個(gè)問題[J];東岳論叢;2007年01期

7 胡鋼;案件事實(shí)篇 解讀思科訴華為案[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年04期

8 黃勇;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與反壟斷法的基本關(guān)系[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年07期

9 李明德;;“知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用”是一個(gè)模糊命題[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年10期

10 李琛;;禁止知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的若干基本問題研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 姜成;TRIPS協(xié)定與限制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用分析[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2008年

2 謝琴錚;國(guó)際法視野下的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用規(guī)制[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

3 王u&;國(guó)際貿(mào)易中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的法律規(guī)制研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

4 馮妍秋;濫用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷法規(guī)制研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1740683