本文選題：文化遺產(chǎn) + 國(guó)家繼承　； 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》2017年02期

【摘要】：文化遺產(chǎn)是一種稀缺的財(cái)產(chǎn),但它又不僅僅是財(cái)產(chǎn),因?yàn)槊恳环N文化遺產(chǎn)都蘊(yùn)含著歷史、藝術(shù)、文化等價(jià)值。在國(guó)家繼承實(shí)踐中,文化遺產(chǎn)往往僅作為一般財(cái)產(chǎn),依據(jù)領(lǐng)土相關(guān)、協(xié)議解決、貢獻(xiàn)比例等原則繼承,但這會(huì)容易造成一些文化遺產(chǎn)大量流失到異國(guó)。文化遺產(chǎn)的國(guó)家繼承,應(yīng)遵循最密切聯(lián)系民族原則,由創(chuàng)造文化遺產(chǎn)的民族及其所屬國(guó)家繼承,從而有利于保護(hù)文化遺產(chǎn),使得其價(jià)值獲得最大體現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Cultural heritage is a scarce property, but it is not only property, because each kind of cultural heritage contains historical, artistic, cultural and other values.In the practice of State succession, cultural heritage is usually inherited only as general property, according to the principles of territorial correlation, settlement by agreement, contribution ratio, etc., but this will easily result in a large loss of some cultural heritage to another country.The state succession of cultural heritage should follow the principle of the most closely related nationality, and be inherited by the nation that creates the cultural heritage and the state to which it belongs, which is conducive to the protection of the cultural heritage and the maximum embodiment of its value.
【作者單位】： 華東理工大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：上海浦江人才項(xiàng)目“傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)的全球多邊惠益分享機(jī)制研究”(項(xiàng)目號(hào):12PJC023)階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D997

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 肖飛;;維也納關(guān)于條約的國(guó)家繼承公約[J];國(guó)外法學(xué);1980年02期

2 M·M·博古斯拉夫斯基;B·B·齊布科夫;黃肇炯;;關(guān)于國(guó)家繼承的新公約[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;1984年06期

3 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1733536