本文選題：民商事裁判　切入點(diǎn)：《紐約公約》　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著國(guó)家間經(jīng)濟(jì)往來的日益密切,國(guó)際民商事司法協(xié)助也隨之變得越來越重要。民商事裁判在裁判地以外的國(guó)家得到承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行,既有助于增強(qiáng)跨國(guó)間民商事活動(dòng)的司法保障,又能節(jié)省司法資源,同時(shí)也能便宜當(dāng)事人尋求司法救濟(jì)。 在過去的近三十年時(shí)間里,中國(guó)大陸不斷增強(qiáng)與外界的溝通和聯(lián)系,在民商事裁判跨國(guó)承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行方面取得了不菲的成果。加入《紐約公約》、同34個(gè)國(guó)家簽訂包含民商事裁判跨國(guó)承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的雙邊條約以及頒布關(guān)于中國(guó)公民申請(qǐng)承認(rèn)外國(guó)法院離婚判決的規(guī)定,構(gòu)成了中國(guó)大陸承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行外國(guó)民商事裁判的框架性規(guī)范。 對(duì)于國(guó)外民商事裁判在中國(guó)大陸的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行,中國(guó)大陸的學(xué)者通常是把國(guó)外民商事裁判區(qū)分為仲裁裁決和法院裁判兩部分來分別研究的。而筆者認(rèn)為,在研究國(guó)外仲裁裁決和外國(guó)法院裁判等國(guó)外民商事裁判在中國(guó)大陸的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行時(shí),不宜將二者割裂開來:首先,兩者在中國(guó)大陸承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的主管機(jī)關(guān)相同、適用的程序相同、審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及后續(xù)處理方式也大致相同;第二,中國(guó)大陸與34個(gè)國(guó)家簽訂的司法協(xié)助條約中,對(duì)仲裁裁決和法院判決大多是作為一類規(guī)定的;最后,仲裁的私法性和法院裁判的公法性不影響其在中國(guó)大陸承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的過程。對(duì)國(guó)外民商事裁判區(qū)分為兩類進(jìn)行研究,不利于實(shí)踐中相關(guān)制度的建立。因此,本文對(duì)國(guó)外民商事裁判的類型并未按仲裁裁決和法院裁判做刻意地區(qū)分,而是按照法律淵源的不同來組織論述的。 本論文分三部分:第一部分論述了可在中國(guó)大陸承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的民商事裁判的范圍。該部分采用對(duì)當(dāng)前相關(guān)法律淵源進(jìn)行梳理和歸納的方法,按照法律淵源的不同,將國(guó)際公約、雙邊條約和互惠原則下的可承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的民商事裁判分別加以列明。第二部分則論述了中國(guó)大陸對(duì)國(guó)外民商事裁判承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的一般制度,按承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的流程,分別論述了申請(qǐng)的提出、對(duì)請(qǐng)求的審查、裁定的作出、執(zhí)行中的特殊情形以及期間費(fèi)用等幾個(gè)部分,其中最核心的是“申請(qǐng)應(yīng)附的材料”和“不予承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的情形”兩部分。第三部分則是在前兩部分的基礎(chǔ)上,論述了外國(guó)民商事裁判在中國(guó)大陸承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的問題與完善。本部分主要針對(duì)可承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的國(guó)外民商事裁判的范圍、請(qǐng)求承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行應(yīng)提交的材料、審查的形式規(guī)范和期間等方面,提出了當(dāng)前存在的問題和相關(guān)建議。 全文主要以總結(jié)歸納的形式,將國(guó)外民商事裁判在中國(guó)大陸承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行進(jìn)行了框架性梳理,從中發(fā)現(xiàn)某些問題并提出了一些建議。希望本文能為國(guó)外民商事裁判在中國(guó)大陸承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的后續(xù)研究及相關(guān)制度的完善提供一定參考。
[Abstract]:With the increasingly close economic ties between countries, international civil and commercial judicial assistance becomes more and more important. The National Civil referee referee in other recognized and enforced, it will help to enhance the judicial protection of transnational civil and commercial activities, but also can save the judicial resources, but also cheap parties to seek judicial relief.
In the past thirty years, Chinese, strengthen communication and contact with the outside world, in the international civil and commercial judgment recognition and enforcement achieved a lot. "Join the New York Convention", with 34 countries signed Bao Hanmin tocommercial judgment recognition and enforcement of international bilateral treaties and promulgated regulations on Chinese citizenship recognition of a divorce judgment of a foreign court, a China, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters in the framework of the standard.
For the implementation of foreign civil and commercial China, in recognition of the referee, China, scholars usually put foreign civil and commercial arbitration and court judge is divided into two parts to study the referee respectively. The author believes that, in the study of foreign arbitration and Adjudication in foreign civil and commercial matters, and Chinese admitted the referee in execution two, should not be separated: first of all, both in Chinese, admitted to the same with the competent authorities of execution, the same applicable procedures, standard of review and subsequent treatment are roughly the same; second, signed China, and judicial assistance treaties with 34 countries, and the court ruling on the arbitration award is mostly as a class the provisions of the law; finally, the public law and the court of arbitration in Chinese, does not affect the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial process. Divided into two categories in the study, It is not conducive to the establishment of relevant systems in practice. Therefore, this article does not deliberately distinguish the types of civil and commercial judgments in foreign countries according to the arbitral awards and the court adjudication, but it organizes the discussion according to the different sources of law.
This thesis is divided into three parts: the first part discusses the scope in China, recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments. This part uses the method of combing and summarizing of current relevant legal sources, according to different sources of law, the international conventions, bilateral treaties and Hu Huiyuan is the recognition and enforcement of civil judgment are specified. The second part discusses the China, for general system of foreign civil and commercial judicial recognition and enforcement, according to the approval procedure and implementation, discusses the application of the proposed request for review, decision made, special circumstances in the implementation of and costs during the several parts of the core the two part is the application of the material should be "and" should not recognize and enforce the situation. The third part is on the basis of the two parts, discusses the foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters in the mainland and Chinese admit Problems and improvements in implementation. This section mainly focuses on the scope of foreign civil and commercial referees which can be recognized and executed, the materials to be submitted for recognition and enforcement, the format and duration of review, and puts forward some existing problems and related suggestions.
This paper mainly summarized the form of foreign civil and commercial Chinese, recognition and enforcement of judgment in the framework of combing, find some problems and put forward some suggestions. I hope this paper can improve the recognition and subsequent research, Chinese in execution and the related system of foreign civil and commercial judgments to provide a reference.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997.3;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 凡啟兵;;論非內(nèi)國(guó)仲裁裁決[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2007年09期

2 杜新麗;論外國(guó)仲裁裁決在我國(guó)的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行——兼論《紐約公約》在中國(guó)的適用[J];比較法研究;2005年04期

3 李廣輝;王瀚;;我國(guó)區(qū)際法院判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行制度之比較[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年02期

4 王崇能;;論我國(guó)承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行外國(guó)仲裁裁決程序法的完善[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

5 趙秀文;;從相關(guān)案例看ICC仲裁院裁決在我國(guó)的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[J];法學(xué);2010年03期

6 劉冰;;外國(guó)法院判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行條件問題研究[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

7 葉斌;;2005年《選擇法院協(xié)議公約》拒絕承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行外國(guó)判決的理由[J];河北法學(xué);2009年04期

8 趙秀文;;論《紐約公約》裁決在我國(guó)的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行——兼論我國(guó)涉外仲裁立法的修改與完善[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年02期

9 杜濤;;互惠原則與外國(guó)法院判決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2007年01期

10 劉想樹;涉外仲裁裁決執(zhí)行制度之評(píng)析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2001年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 錢鋒;論外國(guó)法院民商事判決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1721368