本文選題：英國　切入點：禁奴制度　出處：《東北師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在國際法的發(fā)展演進中,大國是促進其發(fā)展的重要變量,是主要的推動力之一。歷史經驗證明,荷蘭、法國、英國、美國在成為世界強國的道路上,在以軍事、政治和經濟上獲得了世界優(yōu)勢地位的同時,無不進行國際法制建設,積極推動符合其需要的制度國際法制化。本文以英國推動禁止奴隸制度國際法制化這一具體實踐為例,探究大國推動國際法制發(fā)展的理念、動力、路徑及其規(guī)律,進而為我國參與和引領國際治理體系提供經驗與借鑒。本論文共分為五部分:首先是緒論部分。此部分作者闡述了大國推動國際法制化建設的研究背景、研究意義以及研究的創(chuàng)新點等,為接下來深入探討英國進行國際法制化建設的路徑奠定前期基礎。第一章是英國推動禁奴制度國際法制化的國內立法分析。該部分主要討論了英國通過國內立法的形式實現(xiàn)了禁奴制度國內法制化,并著重分析了影響英國推行禁奴制度國內立法的諸多因素。第二章是英國推動禁奴制度國際法制化的國際條約路徑分析。這一章探討了英國如何運用國際條約這一路徑實現(xiàn)其推動禁奴制度國際法制化的目標。在此路徑下,無論是條約的簽訂還是保障條約的執(zhí)行,英國都積極地參與其中并發(fā)揮著促進與引導作用。第三章是英國推動禁奴制度國際法制化的國際習慣路徑分析。此部分著重分析了英國將禁止奴隸制度推向世界過程中所運用的國際習慣,從利益偶合模式、威逼脅迫模式以及合作協(xié)調模式這三個不同的方式具體分析了英國對國際習慣路徑的運用。第四章是英國推動禁奴制度國際法制化的規(guī)律總結。從英國推動禁奴制度國際法制化的路徑實踐中,可以總結出幾點規(guī)律,包括形成思想領域的共識;遵循國內、國際的環(huán)境變化;綜合運用國際條約與國際習慣的路徑;抓好自身理論建設;以及對參與過程中的具體細節(jié)加以關注。這些規(guī)律的總結為大國參與、引領國際法制化建設提供了切實可行的建議。
[Abstract]:In the evolution of international law, great power is an important variable to promote its development and one of the main driving forces.Historical experience has proved that the Netherlands, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States, on the way to becoming a world power, have gained a dominant position in the world with military, political and economic advantages, and at the same time have all carried out the construction of international legal system.To actively promote the international legal system in accordance with its needs.Taking the concrete practice of Britain to promote the international legalization of the prohibition of slavery as an example, this paper probes into the idea, motive force, path and law of the great powers to promote the development of international legal system, thus providing experience and reference for our country to participate in and lead the international governance system.This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction.In this part, the author expounds the research background, significance and innovation of the international legalization construction promoted by the big countries, which lays the foundation for the further discussion on the path of the international legalization construction in Britain.The first chapter is the analysis of the domestic legislation of the United Kingdom to promote the international legalization of slavery system.In this part, the author mainly discusses the realization of the domestic legalization of the slavery system in Britain through the form of domestic legislation, and emphatically analyzes many factors that affect the implementation of the domestic legislation of the slavery system in the United Kingdom.The second chapter is the analysis of the international treaty path of the United Kingdom to promote the international legalization of slavery system.This chapter explores how Britain uses international treaties to achieve its goal of promoting the international legalization of slavery.In this way, whether it is the signing of treaties or the guarantee of their implementation, Britain actively participates in them and plays a role in promoting and guiding them.The third chapter is the analysis of the international customary path to promote the international legalization of slavery system in Britain.This part focuses on the analysis of the international customs used in the process of banning slavery in Britain, from the mode of coupling of interests.This paper analyzes the use of the international customary path in Britain in three different ways, namely, coercion and cooperation and coordination.The fourth chapter is a summary of the law of promoting the international legalization of slavery system in Britain.From the path practice of promoting the international legalization of slavery system in Britain, we can sum up several rules, including forming a consensus in the field of thought, following the changes of domestic and international environment, synthetically applying international treaties and international customs;Do a good job of their own theoretical construction; and the process of participation in the specific details of attention.The conclusion of these laws provides practical suggestions for big countries to participate and lead the construction of international legal system.
【學位授予單位】：東北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D99

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 吳曉曉;;國際關系理論研究的“實踐轉向”[J];求知導刊;2015年21期

2 袁莎;;“巴黎學派”與批判安全研究的“實踐轉向”[J];外交評論(外交學院學報);2015年05期

3 秦亞青;;行動的邏輯:西方國際關系理論“知識轉向”的意義[J];中國社會科學;2013年12期

4 金錚;;國際習慣法在英國的適用問題研究[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2011年03期

5 楊冰雙;;國際法上事實承認與法律承認的區(qū)分與矛盾——從國際法案例看英國國際法上的承認的理論及實踐沖突[J];知識經濟;2010年19期

6 朱立群;聶文娟;;國際關系理論研究的“實踐轉向”[J];世界經濟與政治;2010年08期

7 吳修申;;英國:從頭號奴隸販子到國際廢奴運動的積極推動者[J];歷史教學(中學版);2010年07期

8 何志鵬;;國際法的遵行機制探究[J];東方法學;2009年05期

9 蔡高強;;大國崛起與國際法的發(fā)展——兼談中國和平崛起的國際法環(huán)境[J];湘潭大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年04期

10 張旭;陳曉律;;英國大眾廢奴運動的興起:社會運動的視角[J];學海;2009年03期

，

本文編號：1711193