本文選題：安全審查　切入點：外資并購　出處：《上海師范大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：僅僅了解美國的安全審查制度,對于中國企業(yè)而言是不夠的,不同于既往的論文,本文將首先分析美國安全審查制度的緣起和運行方式與特點,再結(jié)合近年來中國企業(yè)在美國安全審查中所面臨的實際問題,總結(jié)出中國企業(yè)在安全審查中主要出現(xiàn)的法律問題,并就此提出法律意見,以實踐可行的方式為中國企業(yè)在外投資提供建議和法律的支持。雖然在學界和各國立法上,對于國家安全并沒有一個統(tǒng)一的認識,但是在幾個方面還是有一定的共識的。首先,在內(nèi)容上,主要是原則性規(guī)范;第二,形式上具有多樣性。其次,從領(lǐng)域上看,不僅僅是在公開領(lǐng)域中維護國家安全,隱蔽領(lǐng)域也是國家安全的一個重點。美國是最早將國家安全理論運用到外國投資領(lǐng)域的國家。在國家安全領(lǐng)域三權(quán)分立也發(fā)揮著同樣的作用,其權(quán)力分別由總統(tǒng)、國會和法院分別行使和制衡。從美國的立法歷史可以看出,對于國家安全的定義界定也是在不斷發(fā)展變化中的。國家安全立法的變化實際上也是國會和總統(tǒng)之間的權(quán)力斗爭的結(jié)果,也是投資貿(mào)易和國家安全之間平衡的結(jié)果。美國法律的通過和審查的重心是與時事相聯(lián)系的。FINSA將國家安全審查的審查對象確定為使得在美國境內(nèi)從事國際商業(yè)的美國企業(yè)被外國人控制企業(yè)或外國人收購、并購或控制的交易。�？松�-弗羅里奧修正案中,將審查應考慮的因素限定在五個方面,FINSA則將應當考慮的因素擴張到十一項。FINSA確定了國家安全審查屬于行政審查性質(zhì)。國家安全審查不能等到國家安全已經(jīng)受到了實質(zhì)的損害的時候才開始,這種審查的價值在于防患于未然。一些專家認為,外國政府會利用SWF的巨大金池來保護戰(zhàn)略性財產(chǎn),比如關(guān)鍵的自然資源或者國防科技。SWF的活動和一般的私人企業(yè)不一樣,他會更多的考慮政治上的因素,因此可能會扭曲市場。中國企業(yè)在舉證意識上還十分淡薄,這使得中國企業(yè)在美國國家安全審查上處于一個十分被動的位置。用和平和理性的方式解決問題,是中國企業(yè)走進外國投資市場一個重要的轉(zhuǎn)變。選擇對美國國家安全審查有深入研究的律師團隊,通過他們適應美國的法律制度,養(yǎng)成法律習慣,尊重美國的法律。這對于希望進入美國投資市場的中國企業(yè)而言是首要的任務。美國國家安全審查的立法是適應著時事的變化而變化的,因此,中國企業(yè)在投資的過程中也應當注意時事的變化對投資可能造成的影響。國有企業(yè)稀釋股權(quán),擴大經(jīng)營范圍,盡早進行企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型,淡化自身國有企業(yè)的形象是排除自身敏感背景最根本也是最有利的途徑。在投資領(lǐng)域上,中國企業(yè)也應盡量避免軍工或國防相關(guān)的企業(yè)或產(chǎn)品。
[Abstract]:It is not enough for Chinese enterprises to understand the security review system in the United States. Different from previous papers, this paper will first analyze the origin, operation mode and characteristics of the security review system in the United States. Combined with the practical problems faced by Chinese enterprises in the US security review in recent years, the main legal problems in the safety review of Chinese enterprises are summarized, and legal opinions are put forward in this regard. To provide advice and legal support for Chinese enterprises to invest abroad in practical and feasible ways. Although there is no unified understanding of national security in academic circles and in the legislation of various countries, there is still a certain consensus in several aspects. First of all, In terms of content, it is mainly a principled norm; second, it is diversified in form. Secondly, in terms of field, it is not just about safeguarding national security in the open sphere. The covert field is also an important part of national security. The United States was the first country to apply the theory of national security to the field of foreign investment. The separation of powers in the field of national security also played the same role. Congress and the courts exercise and balance each other. As can be seen from the legislative history of the United States, The definition of national security is also evolving. The changes in national security legislation are actually also the result of a power struggle between Congress and the President. It is also the result of a balance between investment trade and national security. The focus of the passage and review of United States laws is on current events. Finsa identifies the subject of national security censorship as one that allows international business to be conducted within the United States. American enterprises are controlled by foreigners or acquired by foreigners, A merger or acquisition or controlled transaction. In the Exxon Florio Amendment, By limiting the factors to be considered in five areas, FINSA expands the factors to be considered to 11. FINSA determines that national security review is an administrative review. National security review cannot wait until national security is already under review. It was only when the real damage began, The value of such a review lies in prevention. Some experts believe that foreign governments will use the huge gold pool of SWF to protect strategic assets, such as key natural resources or defense technology. SWF activities are different from those of private companies in general. He will take more political factors into account, and thus may distort the market. Chinese companies have a weak sense of proof. This puts Chinese enterprises in a very passive position in the US national security review. They solve the problem in a peaceful and rational way. It is an important change for Chinese enterprises to enter the foreign investment market. They choose a team of lawyers who have in-depth research into the US national security review, through which they can adapt to the legal system of the United States and develop legal habits. Respect for United States laws. This is a top priority for Chinese companies wishing to enter the U.S. investment market. National Security Review legislation in the United States changes in response to changes in current events. In the process of investment, Chinese enterprises should also pay attention to the possible impact of changes in current events on investment. State-owned enterprises should dilute their shares, expand their business scope, and carry out enterprise transformation as soon as possible. Desalinating the image of its state-owned enterprises is the most fundamental and beneficial way to exclude its sensitive background. In the field of investment, Chinese enterprises should also try to avoid military or defense related enterprises or products.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D996

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 陳業(yè)宏;夏蕓蕓;;中美外資并購立法宗旨之比較[J];法學評論;2012年03期

2 韓龍;沈革新;;美國外資并購國家安全審查制度的新發(fā)展[J];時代法學;2010年05期

，

本文編號：1694320