本文選題：媒體　切入點(diǎn)：司法程序　出處：《重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：自大眾傳媒產(chǎn)生之日起,關(guān)于法律案件的新聞報(bào)道便受到了種種競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性法律價(jià)值的限制。擁有引導(dǎo)輿論功能的新聞媒體在訴訟程序的審前、庭審以及審后階段的報(bào)道,對(duì)司法程序及相關(guān)利益產(chǎn)生了不同程度的影響。就某種意義而言,新聞媒體與訴訟程序儼然成為矛盾的對(duì)立雙方。盡管這一矛盾無(wú)法避免,但通過(guò)界定和判斷新聞自由與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性利益之間的關(guān)系,我們可以進(jìn)行新的關(guān)系調(diào)整以減小矛盾影響,歐洲人權(quán)法院在削弱兩者矛盾方面作出了許多探索和貢獻(xiàn)。文章試圖借鑒歐洲經(jīng)驗(yàn),分析審前階段媒體介入司法程序的效果與規(guī)制,以確立媒體與司法程序之間的合理關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:Since the emergence of the mass media, news reports on legal cases have been restricted by various competitive legal values. The news media, which have the function of guiding public opinion, report in the pretrial, trial and post-trial stages of the proceedings. Has had varying degrees of influence on the judicial process and related interests. In a sense, the news media and the proceedings have become opposing parties to the conflict, although this contradiction cannot be avoided. But by defining and judging the relationship between freedom of the press and competitive interests, we can make new adjustments to reduce the impact of conflicts. The European Court of Human Rights has made many explorations and contributions in weakening the contradiction between the two. This paper attempts to draw lessons from European experience and analyze the effect and regulation of media intervention in judicial proceedings in the pre-trial stage in order to establish a reasonable relationship between the media and the judicial procedure.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué)黨委宣傳部;
【分類號(hào)】：D998.2
，

本文編號(hào)：1683498