本文選題：亞投行　切入點：貸款協(xié)議　出處：《大連海事大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：亞投行在開展貸款業(yè)務時,會與借款人簽訂貸款協(xié)議,圍繞借貸事宜明確各方的權利與義務�？梢�,貸款協(xié)議是亞投行在貸款程序中締結的重要法律文件。與普通的國際借貸協(xié)議一樣,亞投行貸款協(xié)議也涉及法律適用問題,需要將協(xié)議適用的法律加以明確,以便解決貸款相關問題和爭議。但由于亞投行是特殊的國際法主體,銀行開展的貸款業(yè)務種類繁多,借貸對象也比較多元,因此亞投行貸款協(xié)議的法律適用問題要較一般國際借貸協(xié)議復雜。本文將從國際法學角度聚焦這一問題,在介紹亞投行現(xiàn)行貸款協(xié)議及法律適用條款的基礎上,探討銀行法律適用條款的規(guī)則設置、適用風險,并給出完善亞投行法律適用問題的合理建議。文章分為六個章節(jié)。第一章分為兩部分,首先是對亞投行貸款協(xié)議進行介紹,探討協(xié)議的性質與分類,其次是圍繞亞投行貸款協(xié)議法律適用的一般與特殊理論展開的討論,為之后的論述奠定理論基礎。第二章聚焦亞投行貸款協(xié)議法律適用的意思自治問題,以亞投行貸款規(guī)則為切入點,橫向比較三類貸款協(xié)議法律選擇時對意思自治原則的限制,以及這樣做的深層次原因。第三章圍繞最密切聯(lián)系原則在亞投行貸款協(xié)議法律適用中的作用展開,探討與銀行貸款協(xié)議有最密切聯(lián)系法律的判斷標準,并關注運用最密切聯(lián)系、特征履行推定法律時應注意的特殊問題。第四章也分為兩個部分,首先介紹亞投行聯(lián)合貸款協(xié)議的基本內(nèi)容,分析這類協(xié)議法律適用的兼容性問題,其次聚焦亞投行債券籌資貸款協(xié)議,討論該貸款協(xié)議法律適用的特殊性、重要性,以及現(xiàn)存的問題。第五章論述亞投行貸款協(xié)議法律適用的強行法問題,主要圍繞外匯管制法對貸款協(xié)議的不利影響展開,分析外匯管制法得以適用的渠道以及影響貸款協(xié)議的方式。第六章則基于前五章探討的內(nèi)容,為銀行改善法律適用問題逐一給出合理化建議。最后,本文的得出以下結論:銀行應在堅持適用國際法為原則的基礎上,根據(jù)實際情況放寬對意思自治的限制,考慮適用與協(xié)議有最密切聯(lián)系的內(nèi)國法。此外,須完善對聯(lián)合貸款協(xié)議、債券貸款協(xié)議法律適用的規(guī)則設計,采取有效措施規(guī)避強行法帶來的法律適用風險,同時適當補充和完善我國相關涉外法律。
[Abstract]:When the AIIB starts its lending business, it will sign loan agreements with borrowers, clarifying the rights and obligations of all parties around the issue of lending. Loan agreements are important legal documents concluded by the AIIB in its lending procedures. Like ordinary international lending agreements, AIIB loan agreements involve the application of the law, which needs to be clarified. In order to resolve the loan-related problems and disputes. However, as the AIIB is a special subject of international law, the types of loans banks carry out are various, and the recipients of loans are also quite diverse. Therefore, the legal application of AIIB loan agreements is more complicated than that of general international lending agreements. This paper will focus on this issue from the perspective of international law, on the basis of introducing the current AIIB loan agreements and applicable terms of law. The article is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is divided into two parts. Firstly, the loan agreement of the AIIB is introduced. This paper discusses the nature and classification of the agreements, followed by a discussion on the general and special theories of the application of the AIIB loan agreements. The second chapter focuses on the autonomy of interest in the application of AIIB's loan agreement, taking the AIIB's loan rules as the starting point to compare the restrictions on the principle of autonomy of will in the selection of the three kinds of loan agreements. Chapter three focuses on the role of the closest link principle in the legal application of the AIIB loan agreement, and discusses the judgment criteria that have the closest connection with the bank loan agreement, and pays close attention to the application of the closest link. The fourth chapter is also divided into two parts. First, the basic content of AIIB Joint loan Agreement is introduced, and the compatibility of the application of such agreements is analyzed. Secondly, focusing on the AIIB bond financing loan agreement, discussing the particularity, importance and existing problems of the law application of the loan agreement. Chapter five discusses the jus cogens of the law application of the AIIB loan agreement. Focusing on the adverse effects of foreign exchange control law on loan agreements, this paper analyzes the channels through which foreign exchange control laws can be applied and the ways in which they affect loan agreements. The sixth chapter is based on the contents discussed in the first five chapters. Finally, the paper draws the following conclusions: banks should relax the restrictions on autonomy of will on the basis of the principle of applying international law. Consideration should be given to the application of the domestic law which is most closely related to the agreement. In addition, it is necessary to improve the design of the rules applicable to the joint loan agreement and the bond loan agreement, and to take effective measures to avoid the risk of the application of the law brought about by the mandatory law. At the same time, appropriate complement and improve our relevant foreign-related laws.
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D996.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 H·J·哈恩;黃列;;國際貸款協(xié)議[J];環(huán)球法律評論;1991年06期

2 陳外華;;國際貸款協(xié)議中的陳述與保證條款[J];法制與經(jīng)濟;1996年06期

3 段婧;;國際直接銀團貸款協(xié)議中的法律問題探究[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2011年13期

4 K·梅塔拉;賈煒;;國際項目融資貸款協(xié)議中有關法律適用的幾個問題[J];環(huán)球法律評論;1988年02期

5 徐揚;馮雷;孫英威;;東北重建金融新生態(tài)[J];w，

本文編號：1683130