本文選題：實際承運人　切入點：代碼共享　出處：《法商研究》2017年05期

【摘要】：實際承運人并非運輸合同當事人,相關國際公約和我國法律卻規(guī)定其對旅客/托運人承擔合同責任,這突破了"合同相對性原則"。明確其法律地位,厘清其從事運輸的法律關系,是準確適用法律的前提。"指導案例51號"中法院判決實際承運人對旅客承擔合同責任,但或許因理論準備不足,論證過程中回避了這一疑難問題,其指導性價值難免受限。相較于履行輔助人,利他合同債務人是實際承運人法律地位的合理解釋。實際承運人法律地位的研究對我國國際國內物流大通道建設和"一帶一路"戰(zhàn)略的實施具有重大現(xiàn)實意義。
[Abstract]:The actual carrier is not a party to the contract of carriage, but the relevant international conventions and the law of our country stipulate that the carrier bears contractual liability to the passenger / shipper, which breaks through the "principle of relativity of contract" and clarifies its legal status. It is a prerequisite for the accurate application of the law to clarify the legal relationship of the carrier engaged in transport. In "guiding case 51", the court ruled that the actual carrier should bear contractual responsibility for the passenger, but perhaps due to inadequate theoretical preparation, the difficult question was avoided in the course of argumentation. Its guiding value is bound to be limited. Altruistic contract debtor is a reasonable explanation of the actual carrier's legal status. The study of the actual carrier's legal status is of great practical significance to the construction of China's international and domestic logistics channels and the implementation of "Belt and Road" strategy.
【作者單位】： 中國民航大學法學院;
【基金】：天津市普通高校人文社會科學重點研究基地開放式基金項目(HK2013YB01)
【分類號】：D993.4

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 吳正棟;;淺析我國實際承運人制度的完善[J];法制與社會;2013年15期

2 歐陽Z，

本文編號：1678172