本文選題：平行進(jìn)口　切入點(diǎn)：專利權(quán)　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口,是指在國際貨物貿(mào)易中,未經(jīng)進(jìn)口國專利權(quán)人授權(quán),將專利權(quán)人或其他被許可人投放于境外市場的產(chǎn)品進(jìn)口至境內(nèi)的行為。目前對于該問題存在兩種主流觀點(diǎn)：允許和禁止平行進(jìn)口。允許平行進(jìn)口對于平行進(jìn)口商和消費(fèi)者來說能帶來一定的利益,但是會損害權(quán)利人的利益；禁止平行進(jìn)口則有可能導(dǎo)致出現(xiàn)權(quán)利壟斷,影響商品自由貿(mào)易。 不同國家對這個(gè)問題持不同態(tài)度的主要原因在于利益的取向。對專利技術(shù)較強(qiáng)的國家來說,禁止平行進(jìn)口可以保證權(quán)利人的利益最大化,從而貢獻(xiàn)于本國的經(jīng)濟(jì)；對于不發(fā)達(dá)的經(jīng)濟(jì)體來說,允許平行進(jìn)口不但可以使本國消費(fèi)者得到較大的實(shí)惠,更加能夠促進(jìn)本國經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)的提升。禁止平行進(jìn)口的國家一般采用是權(quán)利國內(nèi)窮盡原則,代表國家是美國、意大利、比利時(shí)；而允許的國家則采取權(quán)利國際窮盡原則,代表國家是中國、新加坡和日本。 中國現(xiàn)行《專利法》是2008年修改2009年施行的,明確了我國適用權(quán)利國際窮盡原則,允許平行進(jìn)口。這一規(guī)定符合我國現(xiàn)實(shí)的國情,但是準(zhǔn)入門檻過低,因此,建議我國適用較為中立的默示許可原則。默示許可原則是以允許平行進(jìn)口行為存在為前提,采用契約的形式對平行進(jìn)口行為進(jìn)行限制,如果沒有限制則視為允許平行進(jìn)口,由法官判斷是否存在默示許可情形,由于自由裁量權(quán)的存在,可以更好的保證國家利益。
[Abstract]:Parallel import of patented products means that, in international trade in goods, the patent holder of the importing country has not authorized it, The act of importing products placed on the overseas market by the patentee or other licensee. There are two prevailing views on this issue: allowing and prohibiting parallel imports and allowing parallel imports to parallel importers. And consumers can bring certain benefits, However, the interests of the obligee will be damaged, and the prohibition of parallel import may lead to a monopoly of rights and affect the free trade of goods. The main reason why different countries hold different attitudes to this problem lies in the orientation of interests. For countries with strong patent technology, prohibiting parallel imports can ensure the maximization of the interests of the obligee and thus contribute to the national economy. For the underdeveloped economies, allowing parallel imports not only benefits their consumers more, but also promotes the development of their economies. To promote economic and technological upgrading. Countries that prohibit parallel imports generally adopt the principle of domestic exhaustion of rights, representing the United States, Italy and Belgium; and countries that allow them to adopt the principle of international exhaustion of rights, representing China. Singapore and Japan. The current Patent Law of China was amended in 2008 and implemented in 2009, which makes clear that China applies the principle of international exhaustion of rights and permits parallel imports. This provision conforms to the actual situation of our country, but the threshold of entry is too low, so, It is suggested that our country should apply the relatively neutral implied license principle. The implied license principle is based on allowing the existence of parallel import behavior, and uses the form of contract to restrict parallel import behavior, and if there is no restriction, it is regarded as allowing parallel import. Judging by the judge whether there is implied permission, because of the existence of discretion, can better protect the national interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.1;D923.42

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 董桂文;貿(mào)易自由化下的平行進(jìn)口法律規(guī)制研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

2 祝寧波;平行進(jìn)口法律制度研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

3 武蘭芬;專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析與貿(mào)易實(shí)證研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

4 馬樂;國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易中平行進(jìn)口法律規(guī)制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1676430