本文選題：海盜行為　切入點(diǎn)：海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：海盜并不是一種新的海上風(fēng)險(xiǎn),自從海上貿(mào)易興起之后它就一直伴隨其存在并發(fā)展。現(xiàn)代海盜行為對(duì)航運(yùn)業(yè)和海上保險(xiǎn)帶來的影響已經(jīng)不容忽視。本文旨在通過海上保險(xiǎn)的理論視角,對(duì)現(xiàn)代海盜行為所引發(fā)的有關(guān)海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問題作出歸納總結(jié)。通過進(jìn)一步系統(tǒng)的和有層次性的理論分析,從海盜行為的基本概念入手結(jié)合海商法和海上保險(xiǎn)法律的基本理論和各國(guó)對(duì)海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的保險(xiǎn)和法律實(shí)踐,并以我國(guó)相關(guān)法律實(shí)踐為基礎(chǔ),對(duì)海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的具體內(nèi)涵作出剖析,對(duì)海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)中涉及的關(guān)鍵性問題予以明確。在此基礎(chǔ)上,針對(duì)我國(guó)法律的規(guī)定,對(duì)如何應(yīng)對(duì)當(dāng)前的海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)提出綜合的建議。 本文除摘要與引言外共由四部分構(gòu)成。 第一章,“海盜行為”,從海盜行為著手,分析和界定現(xiàn)代海盜行為與傳統(tǒng)海盜行為在行為方式上的區(qū)別,并就此歸納出現(xiàn)代海盜行為的基本特點(diǎn)和典型的行為方式,明確現(xiàn)代海盜行為在法律上的定義,闡明本文的論述基礎(chǔ)。 第二章,“海上保險(xiǎn)中的海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”,概述海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn),列舉在海上保險(xiǎn)的實(shí)踐中常見的承保海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的具體險(xiǎn)種和承保層次,同時(shí)通過對(duì)相關(guān)概念的比較突出海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的特征。 第三章,“海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及損失的保險(xiǎn)分?jǐn)偂?對(duì)在海上保險(xiǎn)中海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)所引起的損失的責(zé)任和分?jǐn)傆枰悦鞔_。本章的論述分為三個(gè)層次,每個(gè)層次下都由典型案例作為引出和論點(diǎn)的主要支撐。首先,介紹海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分?jǐn)偟幕驹瓌t；其次,對(duì)保險(xiǎn)承保的租約下的損失與責(zé)任的承擔(dān)進(jìn)行介紹,通過具體的分析明確海盜劫持是否能構(gòu)成停租,以及造成的直接的時(shí)間損失和其他費(fèi)用的承擔(dān)。最后,對(duì)海盜贖金的合法性、性質(zhì)、以及認(rèn)定作出詳盡的解釋說明,并明確對(duì)海盜贖金性質(zhì)認(rèn)定的具體標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第四章,“中國(guó)法下對(duì)海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的應(yīng)對(duì)”,總結(jié)我國(guó)在有關(guān)海上保險(xiǎn)的法律規(guī)定中海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的具體內(nèi)容,并針對(duì)現(xiàn)階段我國(guó)法律規(guī)定通過海上保險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn),提出合理的系統(tǒng)化可行性建議,以適應(yīng)航運(yùn)實(shí)踐的需要。
[Abstract]:Piracy is not a new maritime risk, Since the rise of maritime trade, it has been accompanied by its existence and development. The influence of modern piracy on shipping industry and marine insurance can not be ignored. The purpose of this paper is to use the theoretical perspective of marine insurance. This paper summarizes the risk of piracy caused by modern piracy. Through further systematic and hierarchical theoretical analysis, Starting with the basic concept of piracy, combining the basic theories of maritime law and marine insurance law and the insurance and legal practice of piracy risk in various countries, and based on the relevant legal practice of our country, this paper analyzes the specific connotation of piracy risk. The key problems involved in the piracy risk are clarified. Based on this, the comprehensive suggestions on how to deal with the current piracy risk are put forward according to the provisions of the law of our country. This paper consists of four parts except abstract and introduction. The first chapter, "Piracy", analyzes and defines the difference between modern piracy and traditional piracy from piracy, and concludes the basic characteristics and typical behavior of modern piracy. Clarify the legal definition of modern piracy and clarify the basis of this paper. The second chapter, "Pirate risk in marine insurance", outlines piracy risk, enumerates the specific types and underwriting levels of pirate risk which are common in the practice of marine insurance, and at the same time, highlights the characteristics of piracy risk through the comparison of related concepts. The third chapter, "Pirates risk and loss insurance allocation", clarifies the liability and allocation of losses caused by piracy risk and piracy risk in marine insurance. The discussion in this chapter is divided into three levels. Each level is supported mainly by typical cases. First, it introduces the basic principles of piracy risk allocation; secondly, it introduces the loss and liability under the insurance lease. Through specific analysis, it is clear whether piracy hijacking can constitute a stop lease, as well as the direct loss of time and other expenses incurred. Finally, a detailed explanation of the legality, nature, and determination of the pirate ransom is given. And clear on the nature of piracy ransom specific criteria. Chapter four, "how to deal with the risk of piracy under Chinese law", summarizes the specific contents of the risk of piracy in the legal provisions of marine insurance in China, and aims at dealing with the risk of piracy through marine insurance at this stage. Put forward reasonable systematic feasibility suggestions to meet the needs of shipping practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D997.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹玉墀;劉軍坡;牟珩;;2010年全球海盜襲擊事件分析[J];世界海運(yùn);2011年07期

2 劉強(qiáng);曲峰德;王鳳武;王超;;海盜活動(dòng)規(guī)律分析及應(yīng)對(duì)措施[J];世界海運(yùn);2011年10期

3 陳敬明;;海盜犯罪的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析及對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2011年10期

4 初北平;李壘;;英國(guó)高等法院對(duì)CONWARTIME 1993租約條款中“War Risks”的解釋[J];世界海運(yùn);2012年02期

5 付新平;鄒敏;褚利叢;;國(guó)際航運(yùn)海盜風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理對(duì)策研究[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期

6 徐晨;;海盜行為和海上恐怖主義行為的比較研究[J];行政與法;2011年02期

7 傅廷中;徐昕;;海商法視角內(nèi)的海盜強(qiáng)索贖金問題[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2009年Z1期

8 石丹;;從海盜贖金的雙重性質(zhì)看船東與貨主的博弈[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2009年Z1期

9 何麗新;陳永燦;;索馬里海盜贖金的共同海損性質(zhì)論[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2010年03期

10 張麗英;杜康平;;海盜羈押不構(gòu)成停租——評(píng)2010年the“Cosco Bulk Carrier v. Team-Up Owning”案[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2011年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 楊雪;海盜贖金的保險(xiǎn)賠償責(zé)任研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

2 趙昭然;海盜與海上保險(xiǎn)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

3 胡斌;海盜贖金支付的法律分析[D];湘潭大學(xué);2011年

4 郭慶;索馬里海盜贖金性質(zhì)及保險(xiǎn)賠付研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

5 張金霞;海盜險(xiǎn)保險(xiǎn)條款研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1669484