本文選題：保護傘條款　切入點：選擇管轄條款　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目前許多雙邊投資協(xié)定中都訂入了保護傘條款，用以規(guī)定締約一方應(yīng)遵守其對締約另一方投資者所作的特定承諾。晚近在解決投資爭端國際中心（簡稱ICSID）中出現(xiàn)了一系列涉及保護傘條款適用的仲裁案件，但這些案件的仲裁庭在裁決中對該條款所采用的解釋方法以及最終得出的結(jié)論卻各不相同，有些甚至完全相左。這使得保護傘條款的適用問題難以確定，同時在學(xué)界也引起了相當(dāng)?shù)年P(guān)注。至今西方學(xué)界仍沒有統(tǒng)一的意見。 本文旨在通過對ICSID仲裁庭對于保護傘條款的一系列判決的分析，試圖找到在實踐中切實可行的在承認(rèn)保護傘條款存在意義的同時有效地對其適用范圍進行有效限制的手段。筆者認(rèn)為，一味的否定保護傘條款的做法是不合理的，保護傘條款大規(guī)模的出現(xiàn)在雙邊和多邊條約中以及其設(shè)立目的就已經(jīng)證明了其存在的意義。但另一方面，目前的仲裁實踐表現(xiàn)出對保護傘條款的適用范圍進行限制的傾向。目前從實體法角度，無論是理論還是實踐方面，西方學(xué)界都沒有一個得到大多數(shù)學(xué)者認(rèn)可的方案，筆者旨在從實用的角度，認(rèn)為從程序角度是存在有效地對保護傘條款進行適當(dāng)限制的方案的。從近來ICSID相關(guān)裁決來看，體現(xiàn)了仲裁庭對于投資合同中管轄選擇條款予以尊重的傾向。 我國與外國簽訂的雙邊投資保護協(xié)定中也存在著一定數(shù)量的保護傘條款，采取何種策略，實屬重要。本文從我國外商投資和對外投資的實際情況，以對ICSID仲裁庭之前的裁決的分析為切入點，對我國應(yīng)采取的應(yīng)對措施提出建議。 除引論和結(jié)語外，本文共分為五章。 第一章概括介紹保護傘條款的起源和發(fā)展，以及由保護傘條款引發(fā)的爭論 第二章論述保護傘條款存在的意義及其必要性 第三章指出對保護傘條款的范圍存在不同的解釋及保護傘條款適用范圍的傾向性分析及結(jié)論 第四章論述選擇管轄條款對“保護傘條款”的限制作用。 第五章論述中國與保護傘條款以及我國應(yīng)采取的策略。
[Abstract]:At present, many bits include umbrella clauses. A series of recent arbitration cases involving the application of umbrella clauses in the International Centre for the Resolution of Investment disputes (ICSID), which provides that one Contracting Party shall comply with its specific commitments to the investors of the other Contracting Party. But the way in which the arbitral tribunals in these cases interpreted the clause in their decisions and the resulting conclusions were different, some completely different, made it difficult to determine the application of the umbrella clause, At the same time, it has also aroused considerable concern in academic circles. So far, there is still no unified opinion in western academic circles. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the series of decisions of the ICSID arbitral tribunal on the umbrella clause. This paper attempts to find a practical and practical means to effectively limit the scope of application of umbrella clauses while acknowledging the significance of them in practice. The author thinks that it is unreasonable to blindly negate umbrella clauses. The emergence of umbrella clauses on a large scale in bilateral and multilateral treaties, as well as the purpose for which they were established, has proved their existence... but on the other hand, The current arbitration practice shows a tendency to limit the scope of application of the umbrella clause. At present, from the perspective of substantive law, neither theory nor practice has been approved by most scholars in the western academic circles. From a practical point of view, the author thinks that there is a program to limit the umbrella clause effectively from the point of view of procedure. It reflects the tendency of the arbitral tribunal to respect the jurisdictional selection clause in the investment contract. There are a certain number of umbrella clauses in bilateral investment protection agreements between China and foreign countries. Based on the analysis of the ruling before the ICSID arbitration tribunal, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the countermeasures to be taken in our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five chapters. Chapter one introduces the origin and development of umbrella clause and the controversy caused by umbrella clause. The second chapter discusses the significance and necessity of the umbrella clause. The third chapter points out that there are different interpretations of the scope of umbrella clause and the tendency analysis and conclusion of the scope of application of umbrella clause. Chapter 4th discusses the restrictive effect of the choice of jurisdiction clause on the umbrella clause. Chapter 5th discusses China and umbrella clauses and the strategies China should adopt.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王彥志;;投資條約保護傘條款的實踐及其基本內(nèi)涵[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年05期

2 徐崇利;;“保護傘條款”的適用范圍之爭與我國的對策[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年04期

，

本文編號：1641015