本文選題：平行進(jìn)口　切入點(diǎn)：權(quán)利用盡原則　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著各國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)密集產(chǎn)業(yè)比重的增加,在國(guó)際貿(mào)易中涉及知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的問(wèn)題越來(lái)越多,平行進(jìn)口即是其中之一。由于平行進(jìn)口對(duì)很多國(guó)家的經(jīng)濟(jì)都產(chǎn)生了不可忽視的影響,于是,各國(guó)站在自己的立場(chǎng)上紛紛對(duì)平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題表明態(tài)度,或允許或禁止,爭(zhēng)議很大。 其爭(zhēng)議的根本分歧在于各國(guó)或出于對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策的考量,或出于對(duì)本國(guó)現(xiàn)階段經(jīng)濟(jì)的保護(hù),對(duì)于平行進(jìn)口應(yīng)適用何種知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)用盡原則立法態(tài)度不一。這種巨大的國(guó)別差異使得當(dāng)前的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利用盡原則在國(guó)際范圍內(nèi)的適用具有不確定性和模糊性,在國(guó)際貿(mào)易的安全性,自由貿(mào)易的促進(jìn)以及全球福利的增加等方面都造成了許多負(fù)面的影響。對(duì)于這一現(xiàn)狀,最理想的狀況應(yīng)當(dāng)是各國(guó)共同努力,加強(qiáng)溝通協(xié)調(diào)解決。然而,目前最具影響力的TRIPs協(xié)議卻將這一問(wèn)題留給各國(guó)立法自行處理,不得不說(shuō)是一個(gè)重大的遺憾。 針對(duì)此現(xiàn)象,筆者創(chuàng)新地提出在全球范圍內(nèi)構(gòu)建權(quán)利用盡原則的國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)模式的設(shè)想,力圖構(gòu)建一個(gè)既能從整體上增加全球福利,又能在特殊情況下保證實(shí)體公平的機(jī)制。 本文分三章進(jìn)行論述: 第一章筆者選取了我國(guó)、美國(guó)及歐盟作為研究對(duì)象,分別對(duì)上述國(guó)家的專利、商標(biāo)和著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域的權(quán)利用盡原則立法及司法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)介和討論。 第二章通過(guò)分析上述國(guó)家之間有關(guān)權(quán)利用盡原則相關(guān)法律機(jī)制存在的差異,指出權(quán)利用盡原則的立法差異導(dǎo)致了多方面的負(fù)面影響,揭示出在國(guó)際層面協(xié)調(diào)權(quán)利用盡原則的必要性。 第三章提出了解決上述問(wèn)題的國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑。分三個(gè)層面進(jìn)行討論:第一層次,筆者對(duì)可能建立的幾種可能性國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)模式分別進(jìn)行了闡述;第二層次,尋求國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)模式的目的在于解決平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題,而平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生爭(zhēng)議的根源在于它和各國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)之間越來(lái)越緊密的聯(lián)系,因此,國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)模式的優(yōu)劣性必然需要站在法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的角度進(jìn)行論證。在本節(jié),筆者對(duì)采取不同權(quán)利用盡原則下的平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)角度討論,為挑選最優(yōu)的國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)模式提供了重要依據(jù);第三層次,筆者首先在上述結(jié)論的指導(dǎo)下,對(duì)前述可能的國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)模式分別進(jìn)行對(duì)比,從而在經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)基礎(chǔ)上挑選出了能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)全球福利最大化的國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)模式;其次,針對(duì)該模式固有的缺陷進(jìn)行討論,提出了彌補(bǔ)該缺陷的措施,從而最終得出了可采取的,具有可行性的,最優(yōu)國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)模式。
[Abstract]:With the increasing proportion of intellectual property intensive industries in various countries, there are more and more problems involving intellectual property rights in international trade, and parallel import is one of them. Therefore, countries stand on their own position on the issue of parallel import, or permit or prohibit, controversial. The fundamental difference in the dispute lies in whether countries are considering their intellectual property policies or protecting their economies at this stage. There are different attitudes in legislation on the principle of exhaustion of intellectual property rights to be applied to parallel imports. This huge country-specific difference makes the current application of the principle of exhaustion of intellectual property rights in the international context uncertain and ambiguous. The security of international trade, the promotion of free trade and the increase in global welfare have had many negative effects. The ideal situation for this situation should be for countries to work together to strengthen communication and coordination of solutions. It is a great pity that the most influential TRIPs protocol leaves this issue to national legislations. In view of this phenomenon, the author innovatively puts forward the idea of constructing the international coordination model of the principle of exhaustion of rights in the global scope, and tries to construct a mechanism which can increase the global welfare as a whole and guarantee the entity fairness under the special circumstances. This paper is divided into three chapters:. In the first chapter, the author selects our country, the United States and the European Union as the research object, respectively to the patent, the trademark and the copyright domain the right exhaustion principle legislation and the judicature present situation to carry on the brief introduction and the discussion. The second chapter points out that the legislative differences of the principle of exhaustion of rights lead to many negative effects through the analysis of the differences in the legal mechanisms related to the principle of exhaustion of rights among the above-mentioned countries. It reveals the necessity of coordinating the principle of exhaustion of rights at the international level. In the third chapter, the realization path of international coordination is put forward to solve the above problems. It is discussed in three aspects: the first level, the author expounds several possible models of international coordination, the second level, The aim of the search for a model of international coordination is to resolve the problem of parallel imports, which is at the root of the dispute arising from its increasingly close links with the economies of each country. The advantages and disadvantages of international coordination mode must be demonstrated from the angle of law and economics. In this section, the author discusses the problem of parallel import under the principle of exhaustion of different rights from the point of view of law and economics. It provides an important basis for selecting the best international coordination model. At the third level, under the guidance of the above conclusions, the author compares the above-mentioned possible international coordination models respectively. Therefore, the model of international coordination which can maximize global welfare is selected on the basis of economics. Secondly, the inherent defects of the model are discussed, and the measures to remedy this defect are put forward. Feasible, optimal international coordination model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張韜;試論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際保護(hù)中的平行進(jìn)口與進(jìn)口權(quán)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1995年05期

2 李壽雙;歐盟法中的平行進(jìn)口與商標(biāo)權(quán):歷史演變與最新發(fā)展[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年10期

3 王遷;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的“首次銷售原則”[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

4 萬(wàn)鄂湘,陳建德;歐盟知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與貨物自由流動(dòng)原則[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年02期

5 邱平榮;試論對(duì)專利權(quán)人進(jìn)口權(quán)的限制[J];法學(xué);1997年07期

6 梁志文;歐盟商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口:立法、案例及啟示[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

7 余翔;法無(wú)定法——美國(guó)專利權(quán)窮竭與產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口立法及判例分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2000年12期

8 余翔;實(shí)質(zhì)性差別——美國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)耗盡與平行進(jìn)口法律演變及現(xiàn)行準(zhǔn)則[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2001年03期

9 黃山;專利權(quán)人進(jìn)口權(quán)的有關(guān)問(wèn)題[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

10 解錕;;論歐盟法中專利權(quán)的權(quán)利窮竭原則[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 胡濱斌;國(guó)際貿(mào)易中的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)限制研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李娟;論平行進(jìn)口理論與實(shí)踐的最新發(fā)展[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2003年

2 陳麗麗;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際保護(hù)中的平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題述論[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：1616323