NAFTA保障措施法律制度研究
本文選題:NAFTA 切入點:保障措施 出處:《西南政法大學》2011年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:WTO多邊貿(mào)易體制追求公平、自由貿(mào)易,保障措施制度作為公平貿(mào)易條件下國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)的保護手段,對一國貿(mào)易產(chǎn)業(yè)的調(diào)整以及國內(nèi)貿(mào)易安全具有重要的意義,具有“安全閥”的作用。正因為如此,在眾多的國際貿(mào)易協(xié)定以及區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定中大多都有保障措施的制度安排。NAFTA(North America Free Trade Agreement,以下簡稱“NAFTA”)作為世界上第一個由發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家組成的自由貿(mào)易區(qū),保障措施法律制度在《北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定》等法律文件中占有重要地位,美國作為NAFTA的重要成員國,在其后所簽訂的所有貿(mào)易協(xié)定中,幾乎都涉及到保障條款,其發(fā)動的一系列保障措施調(diào)查,比如美國麥麩案、美國鋼鐵保障措施案等,也對全球貿(mào)易產(chǎn)生了重要影響。隨著中國加入世貿(mào)組織,以及中國不斷增加的區(qū)域貿(mào)易實踐,使得保障措施法律制度對中國的對外貿(mào)易業(yè)產(chǎn)生了重要影響,中國在對外貿(mào)易中如何應對保障措施也是我們必須面臨的問題。 本文除引言和結語外,共分為五個部分,采用了政治經(jīng)濟分析、法哲學分析、實證分析、比較分析的研究方法,在著重對NAFTA保障措施制度的類型、實施條件、爭端解決機制進行分析與論述后,對中國所遭遇到的保障措施進行了實證分析,并對中國保障措施制度的建設提出了筆者的建議。 第一部分,NAFTA保障措施的源起及理論基礎探究。本部分主要闡述了NAFTA保障措施的淵源,并對其政治、經(jīng)濟、法律基礎進行了簡要分析,總結出了NAFTA保障措施的特點,為下文進一步的論述NAFTA保障措施法律制度進行了理論鋪墊。 第二部分,NAFTA全球保障措施制度的實施。本部分首先對NAFTA全球保障措施的類型進行了區(qū)分,即分為NAFTA對非成員方和成員方的全球保障措施兩種類型。其次,著重論述了NAFTA保障措施的實施條件,并且對“未預見的發(fā)展”條件在NAFTA兩種類型的保障措施下的異同進行了比較。再次,對NAFTA保障措施的實施程序進行了分析,著重論述了通知和磋商程序。最后,對NAFTA全球保障措施的實施限度、實施方的補償以及被實施方的報復權進行了簡要的分析。 第三部分,NAFTA雙邊保障措施制度的實施。本部分首先介紹了NAFTA雙邊保障措施的類型。其次,著重論述了NFATA雙邊保障措施的實施條件,并對NAFTA雙邊保障措施制度在過渡期內(nèi)和過度期外的異同進行了區(qū)分。最后,論述了NAFTA雙邊保障措施的實施程序、時間以及形式。 第四部分,NAFTA保障措施的爭端解決程序。本部分首先分析NAFTA保障措施爭端解決所適用的機制。其次,對NAFTA保障措施不同爭端解決程序的特點進行了簡要分析。最后,重點論述了NAFTA保障措施爭端解決的仲裁程序。 第五部分,NAFTA保障措施對中國保障措施制度建設的啟示。隨著中國加入世貿(mào)組織以及不斷增加的區(qū)域貿(mào)易實踐,保障措施制度對中國貿(mào)易產(chǎn)生著重要影響。本部分首先分析了中國所面臨的保障措施問題,并在借鑒NAFTA保障措施制度經(jīng)驗的基礎上,為中國保障措施法律制度的建設提出筆者的建議。
[Abstract]:WTO multilateral trade system the pursuit of fairness, free trade, safeguard measures as a means of protection of domestic industries under fair trade conditions, is of great significance to adjust a country's trade industry and domestic trade safety, with "safety valve" role. Because of this,.NAFTA system in a large number of international trade agreements and regional trade most of them have agreement of safeguard measures (North America Free Trade Agreement, hereinafter referred to as "NAFTA") as the world's first composed of developed and developing countries of the free trade area, the legal system of safeguard measures play an important role in the "North American Free Trade Agreement" and other legal documents, the United States as an important member of the NAFTA all trade agreements signed, in later, almost all related to safeguards, it launched a series of measures to protect the investigation, such as the case of wheat bran, The American steel safeguard measures, also have an important impact on Global trade. With Chinese joined WTO, and Chinese increasing regional trade practice, has produced important influence that the safeguard measures of the legal system of China foreign trade industry, Chinese in foreign trade in how to deal with security measures is also a problem we have to face.
Besides the introduction and conclusion, is divided into five parts, the analysis of the political economy, philosophy of law analysis, empirical analysis, comparative analysis of research methods, focuses on the conditions in the implementation of the safeguards system of NAFTA type, and the dispute settlement mechanism is analyzed and discussed, the safeguard measures encountered on the China the empirical analysis, and puts forward suggestions on how to build a China safeguards system.
The first part, explore the origin and theoretical basis of NAFTA safeguard measures. This part mainly expounds the origin of NAFTA safeguard measures, and the political, economic and legal basis are briefly analyzed, summed up the characteristics of NAFTA safeguard measures for the further discussion of NAFTA insurance legal system avoidance measures theoretically.
The second part, the implementation of NAFTA global safeguard measures. This part of the first type of NAFTA global security measures were distinguished, which is divided into the NAFTA of the global safeguard measures and non party members of the two types. Secondly, discusses the implementation conditions of NAFTA safeguard measures, and the similarities and differences of "unforeseen developments" on the condition of two types of NAFTA safeguard measures are compared by the implementation of NAFTA program. Once again, the safeguard measures are analyzed, focusing on the notification and consultation procedures. Finally, the implementation of the NAFTA global limit safeguard measures, makes a brief analysis of the compensation and the implementation of Party Party implement the right of revenge.
The third part, the NAFTA bilateral safeguard measures. This part first introduces the type of NAFTA bilateral safeguard measures. Secondly, focuses on the implementation of NFATA bilateral safeguard measures, and the system of NAFTA bilateral safeguard measures in the transition period and the period of excessive differences into the distinction. Finally, discusses the implementation of NAFTA program the bilateral safeguard measures, time and form.
The fourth part, dispute settlement procedures of NAFTA safeguard measures. This part first analyzes the safeguard measures of NAFTA dispute settlement mechanism applicable. Secondly, the characteristics of NAFTA safeguard measures of different dispute settlement procedures are briefly analyzed. Finally, the paper discusses NAFTA safeguard measures dispute arbitration procedures.
The fifth part, China enlightenment to safeguard system construction of NAFTA safeguard measures. With the practice of regional trade China joined WTO and increasing the safeguards system has great influence on Chinese trade. This part analyzes the safeguard measures Chinese facing application problems, and on the basis of the NAFTA safeguards experience. The author puts forward suggestions for the construction of the legal system of China safeguard measures.
【學位授予單位】:西南政法大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D996.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前6條
1 鄧寧;;北美自由貿(mào)易區(qū)(NAFTA)保障措施研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟;2006年04期
2 黃澗秋;;區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定與WTO保障條款的沖突及其解決[J];當代法學;2006年02期
3 肖又賢;論針對中國的特殊保障措施——中國入世法律文件相關規(guī)定探析[J];當代法學;2003年03期
4 王少波;中國加入WTO與保障措施的適用[J];法學論壇;2001年01期
5 印輝;保障措施法律制度的政治經(jīng)濟分析[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2005年21期
6 陳立虎;區(qū)域貿(mào)易成員實施WTO保障措施問題研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2005年06期
相關博士學位論文 前3條
1 趙生祥;貿(mào)易救濟制度研究[D];西南政法大學;2005年
2 黃澗秋;保障措施實施條件研究[D];蘇州大學;2005年
3 郭策;保障措施制度在GATT/WTO框架下的演進[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2006年
相關碩士學位論文 前4條
1 熊云英;區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排成員實施WTO保障措施中的若干問題研究[D];蘇州大學;2005年
2 賈曼莉;保障措施法律制度研究[D];西北大學;2006年
3 林欣宇;區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排成員實施保障措施問題研究[D];廈門大學;2007年
4 楊永紅;保障措施的實體要件問題研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學;2007年
,本文編號:1612959
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/1612959.html