本文選題：福費廷　切入點：應收賬款　出處：《復旦大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：在國際貿(mào)易的舞臺上中國日漸成為舉足輕重的出口大國,出口產(chǎn)品中資本性商品的比重逐年增加,與此同時中國在國際貿(mào)易融資領域的發(fā)展卻不能與其在國際貿(mào)易中的地位相匹配,金融產(chǎn)品的創(chuàng)新越發(fā)受到重視。福費廷是一種國際上流行的國際貿(mào)易融資手段,其主要應用于中長期資本性商品及大宗商品的出口融資,福費廷業(yè)務中包買商不含追索權地買斷出口商向進口商提供商品而產(chǎn)生的應收賬款,出口商提前收回該款項已達到獲得融資的目的。福費廷在西方國家早已流行而中國起步較晚且市場制度并不健全,國內(nèi)實踐中與國際通行的慣例有著較大的差別,因此在中國法的環(huán)境下敘做福費廷業(yè)務有著潛在的風險和諸多需要探討的問題。 本文第一章首先對福費廷業(yè)務進行了概述。介紹和比較了對福費廷不同的定義及其業(yè)務特點；福費廷在國外和中國的發(fā)展情況以及福費廷業(yè)務中各當事方的法律關系,基于對各當事方權利義務的分析,文章接下來分析了福費廷業(yè)務對于各當事方的利弊。 第二章分析了福費廷業(yè)務中的債權轉(zhuǎn)讓問題。首先明確福費廷的根本性質(zhì)是應收賬款的轉(zhuǎn)讓,之后分析了在福費廷中兩種債權轉(zhuǎn)讓方式——票據(jù)背書轉(zhuǎn)讓與一般債權讓與在形式上的要求與轉(zhuǎn)讓時涉及的法律問題,從而引出了福費廷業(yè)務債權轉(zhuǎn)讓中的無追索權問題。 第三章從追索權的概念入手,分析了在福費廷債權轉(zhuǎn)讓中無追索權的實現(xiàn)方式以及在不同法律背景下,尤其是在中國法的背景下實現(xiàn)無追索權的障礙與風險。最后分析了無追索權的相對性以及要實現(xiàn)無追索權地轉(zhuǎn)讓應收賬款所要滿足的先決條件。 擔保是國際貿(mào)易融資中的重要一環(huán),第四章分析了敘做福費廷業(yè)務涉及到擔保的法律問題。該章分別從票據(jù)擔保與獨立擔保兩個角度,分析了兩種擔保的特征與優(yōu)劣,著重探討了在中國法背景下進行福費廷業(yè)務擔保的問題,尤其對在中國開展獨立擔保做了探討。 第五章分析了福費廷業(yè)務中應收賬款轉(zhuǎn)讓、涉外票據(jù)涉及擔保的法律適用的相關問題,同時依據(jù)最新的部門規(guī)章對在我國境內(nèi)機構對外擔保的法律適用進行了分析,解決了在中國進行對外擔保所涉及的法律沖突問題。
[Abstract]:On the stage of international trade, China is becoming an important export country, and the proportion of capital commodities in its export products is increasing year by year. At the same time, the development of China in the field of international trade financing can not match its position in international trade, and the innovation of financial products is paid more and more attention. It is mainly used in export financing of capital commodities and commodities in the medium and long term. In the Forfaiting business, the contractor buys out the accounts receivable arising from the exporter's supply of the goods to the importer without recourse. Early recovery of the money by exporters has achieved the purpose of obtaining financing. Forfaiting has long been popular in Western countries, while China has a late start and a poor market system, and there is a great difference between domestic practice and international practice. Therefore, doing Forfaiting business under the Chinese law environment has potential risks and many problems to be explored. The first chapter gives an overview of Forfaiting's business. It introduces and compares the different definitions of Forfaiting and its characteristics, the development of Forfaiting in foreign countries and China, and the legal relations between the parties involved in Forfaiting's business. Based on the analysis of the rights and obligations of the parties, the paper then analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of Forfaiting business for the parties. The second chapter analyzes the transfer of creditor's rights in Forfaiting's business. First of all, it is clear that the fundamental nature of Forfaiting is the transfer of accounts receivable. Then it analyzes the legal problems involved in the formal requirements and the assignment of two kinds of creditor's rights in Forfaiting, that is, the transfer of bill endorsement and the transfer of general creditor's rights, and thus leads to the issue of non-recourse in the transfer of Forfaiting's rights of claim. The third chapter starts with the concept of the right of recourse, and analyzes the realization of the right of no recourse in the transfer of Forfaiting's creditor's rights and the different legal background. Especially under the background of Chinese law, the obstacles and risks of realizing the right of no recourse are analyzed. Finally, the relativity of the right of no recourse and the prerequisite to realize the transfer of accounts receivable without recourse are analyzed. Security is an important part of international trade finance. Chapter 4th analyzes the legal problems of the business of forfaiting involving the guarantee. This chapter analyzes the characteristics and advantages of the two guarantees from the two angles of bill guarantee and independent guarantee, respectively. This paper mainly discusses the issue of forfaiting business guarantee under the background of Chinese law, especially the independent guarantee in China. Chapter 5th analyzes the transfer of accounts receivable in Forfaiting business and the related issues concerning the application of foreign instruments to the law of guarantee. At the same time, according to the latest department regulations, it analyzes the legal application of external guarantee of institutions in our country. It resolves the conflict of laws involved in foreign guarantee in China.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996;D922.28

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 王真真;福費廷無追索權問題研究[D];大連海事大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1599613