本文選題：共同市場(chǎng)　切入點(diǎn)：管轄權(quán)　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：東部和南部非洲共同市場(chǎng)(東南非共同市場(chǎng),Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa,COMESA),簡(jiǎn)稱科邁薩,前身為東部和南部非洲優(yōu)惠貿(mào)易區(qū),是在原東部和南部非洲優(yōu)惠貿(mào)易區(qū)的基礎(chǔ)上成立的區(qū)域性經(jīng)濟(jì)組織,是非洲地區(qū)成立最早、最大的、也是最成功的地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)合作組織。東南非共同市場(chǎng)貿(mào)易區(qū),是一個(gè)具有投資和貿(mào)易發(fā)展?jié)摿Φ拇笫袌?chǎng)。當(dāng)前,我們需要掌握和了解東南非共同市場(chǎng)法律機(jī)制以及爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制,以應(yīng)對(duì)未來(lái)可能出現(xiàn)的貿(mào)易摩擦和糾紛。 在東南非共同市場(chǎng)的發(fā)展過(guò)程中,東南非共同市場(chǎng)法院的建立是一件大事。東南非共同市場(chǎng)法院作為共同市場(chǎng)的司法機(jī)關(guān),是共同市場(chǎng)法律體系的骨干,是司法保障體系的核心。東南非共同市場(chǎng)法律的主要淵源包括《共同市場(chǎng)條約》及其協(xié)定。共同市場(chǎng)法院在對(duì)共同市場(chǎng)法律的解釋、對(duì)條約條款進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充方面發(fā)揮這重要作用。 共同市場(chǎng)條約第五章對(duì)共同市場(chǎng)法院的管轄權(quán)作了詳細(xì)規(guī)定。一般而言,法院可根據(jù)共同市場(chǎng)條約的規(guī)定,對(duì)提交的事項(xiàng)進(jìn)行管轄。共同市場(chǎng)成員國(guó)、秘書長(zhǎng)、成員國(guó)的自然人和法人,在法院內(nèi)都有訴訟主體資格。共同市場(chǎng)法院可以行使一般管轄權(quán)、先行裁決管轄權(quán)和咨詢管轄權(quán)。一般管轄權(quán)是指法院根據(jù)共同市場(chǎng)條約的規(guī)定,依據(jù)級(jí)別管轄、地域管轄、和專屬管轄的規(guī)定,對(duì)提交的事項(xiàng)進(jìn)行審理的權(quán)力。共同市場(chǎng)法院的先行裁決管轄權(quán)確保在成員國(guó)的司法領(lǐng)域里,共同市場(chǎng)法律能夠得到統(tǒng)一的解釋和適用;共同市場(chǎng)法院發(fā)布咨詢意見(jiàn)的管轄權(quán)十分廣泛,覆蓋了由條約條款引起的所有法律問(wèn)題。 共同市場(chǎng)法院還具有有限的仲裁管轄權(quán),通過(guò)仲裁方式解決合同當(dāng)事方之間的爭(zhēng)端。仲裁作為可替代性爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制,在其發(fā)展過(guò)程中,仲裁裁決的執(zhí)行至關(guān)重要。 從共同市場(chǎng)法院判決的案例來(lái)看,到目前為止它已經(jīng)發(fā)揮了應(yīng)有的作用。它提供有效的司法保障體系,確保在每一個(gè)成員國(guó)境內(nèi),共同市場(chǎng)法律能得到統(tǒng)一的解釋和適用。然而,共同市場(chǎng)法院的運(yùn)行也存在一些問(wèn)題,只有有效解決了這些問(wèn)題,共同市場(chǎng)法院才能在今后發(fā)揮更為積極的作用。
[Abstract]:The Common Market for Eastern and Southern Comesa, or Comesa, formerly known as the preferential Trade area for Eastern and Southern Africa, Is a regional economic organization established on the basis of the former preferential Trade area for Eastern and Southern Africa. It is the earliest, largest, and most successful regional economic cooperation organization in Africa, the COMESA Trade area. At present, we need to master and understand COMESA legal mechanism and dispute settlement mechanism in order to deal with possible trade frictions and disputes in the future. The establishment of the COMESA Court of Justice was a major event in the development of COMESA, which, as the judicial organ of the Common Market, is the backbone of the legal system of the Common Market. The main sources of COMESA law include the Common Market Treaty and its agreements. The Common Market Court plays an important role in the interpretation of common market law and the supplement of treaty provisions. Chapter 5th of the Treaty of the Common Market sets out in detail the jurisdiction of the Court of the Common Market. In general, the Court may, in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty of the Common Market, exercise jurisdiction over matters referred to it... the States members of the Common Market, the Secretary-General, Natural and legal persons of member States have the subject of action within the Court. The Court of the Common Market may exercise general jurisdiction, first adjudicate jurisdiction and advisory jurisdiction. General jurisdiction refers to the Court in accordance with the provisions of the Common Market Treaty, Competence to hear the matter referred in accordance with the provisions of hierarchical jurisdiction, territorial jurisdiction, and exclusive jurisdiction... the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Market to adjudicate in advance ensures that in the judicial field of the member States, Common market law can be uniformly interpreted and applied; the jurisdiction of the Common Market Court to issue an advisory opinion is broad and covers all legal issues arising from treaty provisions. The Common Market Court also has limited arbitration jurisdiction to settle disputes between the parties to the contract by means of arbitration. Arbitration as an alternative dispute settlement mechanism, in its development process, the enforcement of arbitral awards is crucial. In the case of the Court of Justice of the Common Market, it has so far played its due role. It provides an effective system of judicial guarantees to ensure that it is located in the territory of each member State, However, there are some problems in the operation of the Court of Common Market, which can only be solved effectively if the Court of Common Market can play a more active role in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王彥志,郝秀輝;非政府組織與世界貿(mào)易組織爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2003年06期

2 吳玲t(yī) ;雷俊華;;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制探析[J];社科縱橫;2009年06期

3 張?jiān)骆?;國(guó)際商事?tīng)?zhēng)議解決途徑綜析[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

4 王艷華;南共體在非洲一體化進(jìn)程中的優(yōu)勢(shì)[J];西亞非洲;2005年01期

5 曾瓊;;加納法院對(duì)仲裁活動(dòng)的介入權(quán)述評(píng)[J];西亞非洲;2008年05期

6 許敏;;試論CAFTA爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2007年03期

7 朱偉東;南非法院對(duì)外國(guó)仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行[J];仲裁研究;2005年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高田甜;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制證明負(fù)擔(dān)規(guī)則研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 朱偉東;尼日利亞仲裁制度初探[D];湘潭大學(xué);2002年

2 周英鴿;論WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2003年

3 蔡建東;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制法律問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2003年

4 付五平;論尼日利亞伊格博族習(xí)慣法[D];湘潭大學(xué);2006年

5 娜迪婭;促進(jìn)中國(guó)和COMESA的投資和貿(mào)易合作關(guān)系[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1598735