發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-10 01:13

  本文選題：國(guó)際商事仲裁　切入點(diǎn)：司法監(jiān)督　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化時(shí)代的到來(lái),國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易往來(lái)日益頻繁背景下,國(guó)際商事仲裁因其民間性和效率性逐漸被人們所接受,成為了解決國(guó)際商事糾紛的重要手段。與此同時(shí),基于維護(hù)仲裁公正性和仲裁效率性的目的,國(guó)際商事仲裁的司法監(jiān)督也成為了學(xué)界熱議的話題。應(yīng)當(dāng)說(shuō)隨著國(guó)際商事仲裁制度的發(fā)展,仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度也同步得到了發(fā)展。因此,在國(guó)際商事仲裁制度不斷走向繁榮的今天,討論國(guó)際商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度還是十分有意義的。 本文主要分為三大部分,分別對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度展開論述。第一部分首先從分析國(guó)際商事仲裁的制度概況入手,指出國(guó)際商事仲裁制度在效率和公平價(jià)值上存在著天然的沖突性,并將之作為國(guó)際商事仲裁的司法監(jiān)督制度產(chǎn)生和存在的法理依據(jù)。然后揭示出國(guó)際商事仲裁的契約性、準(zhǔn)司法性和社會(huì)性的特點(diǎn),以及國(guó)家基于當(dāng)事人權(quán)利救濟(jì)的考慮,引入司法權(quán)的干預(yù)以對(duì)其進(jìn)行司法監(jiān)督的必要性。 第二部分首先厘清國(guó)際商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度的概念界定,并分析該制度的特點(diǎn)。接著提出國(guó)際商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督必須堅(jiān)持的原則,即程序公正原則、依法監(jiān)督原則、權(quán)利保護(hù)原則、維護(hù)主權(quán)原則以及衡平審查原則。然后在分析現(xiàn)有關(guān)于國(guó)際商事司法監(jiān)督范圍的“全面監(jiān)督論”和“程序監(jiān)督論”兩種理論的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者認(rèn)為法院在對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督之時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)持以程序?yàn)橹鞯谋O(jiān)督模式。對(duì)于實(shí)體問題的審查,則要在以尊重當(dāng)事人意思自治的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行。在承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行外國(guó)商事仲裁之時(shí),僅僅以違反本國(guó)公共政策為理由對(duì)實(shí)體問題進(jìn)行審查。最后,文章從程序和實(shí)體兩個(gè)角度對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督的范圍進(jìn)行全面闡述。 第三部分則從對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)際商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督概況的分析為起點(diǎn),揭示出我國(guó)國(guó)際商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度存在著過(guò)于注重公平而犧牲效率、采取國(guó)內(nèi)仲裁和涉外仲裁雙軌制模式、可仲裁性事項(xiàng)不明以及重新仲裁制度規(guī)定不清等缺陷。進(jìn)而從上述問題出發(fā),提出在堅(jiān)持效率和公平相結(jié)合的監(jiān)督理念的基礎(chǔ)上改變雙軌制模式、完善程序監(jiān)督中的相關(guān)機(jī)制、合理安排重新仲裁制度、重新限定司法審查時(shí)限等改革措施。最后結(jié)合未來(lái)國(guó)際商事仲裁制度的發(fā)展特點(diǎn),對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)際商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)進(jìn)行展望。
[Abstract]:With the arrival of the era of economic globalization and the increasing frequency of international economic and trade contacts, international commercial arbitration has gradually been accepted by people because of its folklore and efficiency, and has become an important means to solve international commercial disputes. In order to maintain the fairness and efficiency of arbitration, judicial supervision of international commercial arbitration has become a hot topic in academic circles. It should be said that with the development of international commercial arbitration system, Therefore, it is very meaningful to discuss the judicial supervision system of international commercial arbitration at a time when the system of international commercial arbitration continues to flourish. This paper is divided into three parts, respectively, the judicial supervision system of international commercial arbitration is discussed. The first part begins with the analysis of the system of international commercial arbitration. It is pointed out that the international commercial arbitration system has natural conflict in efficiency and fair value, which is regarded as the legal basis for the emergence and existence of the judicial supervision system of international commercial arbitration, and then reveals the contractual nature of international commercial arbitration. The characteristics of quasi-judicial and social, and the necessity of introducing judicial intervention in order to supervise the rights of the party concerned based on the consideration of the relief of the rights of the party concerned. The second part first clarifies the definition of the judicial supervision system of international commercial arbitration, and analyzes the characteristics of the system. Then, it puts forward the principle that the judicial supervision of international commercial arbitration must adhere to, that is, the principle of procedural justice and the principle of supervision according to law. The principle of protection of rights, the principle of safeguarding sovereignty and the principle of equitable review. Then, based on the analysis of the existing theories of "comprehensive supervision" and "procedural supervision" on the scope of international commercial judicial supervision, The author thinks that when the court supervises the international commercial arbitration judicially, it should adhere to the mode of supervision based on procedure. On the basis of respect for party autonomy... when foreign commercial arbitration is recognized and enforced, the substantive issue is examined solely on the grounds of violation of the public policy of the State... finally, This paper comprehensively expounds the scope of judicial supervision of international commercial arbitration from the point of view of procedure and entity. The third part, from the analysis of judicial supervision of international commercial arbitration in China, reveals that the judicial supervision system of international commercial arbitration in China pays too much attention to fairness at the expense of efficiency. Adopting the two-track system of domestic arbitration and foreign-related arbitration, the arbitrability matters are unclear and the re-arbitration system is not clear, and so on. On the basis of adhering to the concept of combining efficiency and fairness, this paper proposes to change the two-track system model, to perfect the relevant mechanism in procedural supervision, and to rationally arrange the arbitration system. Finally, according to the development characteristics of international commercial arbitration system in the future, the development trend of judicial supervision system of international commercial arbitration in China is prospected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4;D925.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄧瑞平,易艷;商事仲裁責(zé)任制度簡(jiǎn)論[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 李艷;;論國(guó)際商事仲裁的優(yōu)劣性及其完善途徑[J];重慶交通學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年04期

3 張澤平;國(guó)際商事仲裁中的責(zé)任制度探析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年08期

4 周成新;美國(guó)法院適用1958年《紐約公約》公共政策抗辯條款的實(shí)踐[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1992年05期

5 萬(wàn)鄂湘,于喜富;再論司法與仲裁的關(guān)系——關(guān)于法院應(yīng)否監(jiān)督仲裁實(shí)體內(nèi)容的立法與實(shí)踐模式及理論思考[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2004年03期

6 笪愷;論國(guó)際商事仲裁中的財(cái)產(chǎn)保全──兼論我國(guó)的立法和司法實(shí)踐[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1995年04期

7 宋麗潔;;對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁“一裁終局”制度設(shè)計(jì)的質(zhì)疑——兼論“自愿仲裁上訴”機(jī)制[J];廣東省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

8 張春良;;論國(guó)際商事仲裁價(jià)值[J];河北法學(xué);2006年06期

9 張美成;試論仲裁制度的法律性質(zhì)及我國(guó)仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)責(zé)任制度的建立[J];江蘇石油化工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期

10 馬永雙;;論和諧本位的仲裁法制理論基礎(chǔ)[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2005年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 石現(xiàn)明;國(guó)際商事仲裁當(dāng)事人權(quán)利救濟(jì)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

2 趙寧;國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決撤銷制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

3 劉京蓮;阿根廷國(guó)際投資仲裁危機(jī)的法理與實(shí)踐研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張偉;論國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的司法審查[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1591097