發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-07 22:09

  本文選題：日落復(fù)審　切入點(diǎn)：美國1930年關(guān)稅法　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：反傾銷作為WTO成員國最常使用的合法的三大貿(mào)易救濟(jì)措施之一,已受到WTO與各成員國的普遍認(rèn)同。然而,反傾銷在保護(hù)本國國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)健康發(fā)展的同時(shí),某些成員國也逐漸利用其規(guī)則漏洞使反傾銷規(guī)則演變成為貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義的工具。為了防止反傾銷措施無限期的拖延下去,WTO在反傾銷規(guī)則中引入了日落復(fù)審制度。日落復(fù)審制度建立在公平正義原則與情勢變更原則基礎(chǔ)上,目的是讓反傾銷措施在繼續(xù)執(zhí)行下去將會(huì)導(dǎo)致不公平的結(jié)果或與當(dāng)前國內(nèi)形勢格格不入時(shí),向“太陽西落”一樣歸于無效。然而,從WTO反傾銷協(xié)定引入日落復(fù)審制度的歷程和貿(mào)易實(shí)踐中的眾多日落復(fù)審案件來看,日落復(fù)審制度的引入并沒有完全達(dá)到預(yù)期的效果,反而為反傾銷措施實(shí)施期限的不合理延長找到了合法的途徑。這其中,以美國和歐盟的立法最具代表性。美國和歐盟作為當(dāng)今世界上最大的兩個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)體,同時(shí)作為我國最為重要的兩大貿(mào)易合作伙伴,在貿(mào)易救濟(jì)措施的運(yùn)用特別是在日落復(fù)審法律制度的制定和實(shí)施方面有著比較豐富和成熟的經(jīng)驗(yàn),對其它國家與WTO本身產(chǎn)生了深刻的影響,而我國在此方面才剛剛起步,我國的《反傾銷條例》對于日落復(fù)審只有框架性、原則性的規(guī)定,諸多內(nèi)容均在摸索中。因此,參考和借鑒美歐日落復(fù)審很有必要。 本文除引言和結(jié)語外,分為四大部分。綜合運(yùn)用了實(shí)證分析、比較分析、統(tǒng)計(jì)分析的方法進(jìn)行研究,在評述、比較美國和歐盟日落復(fù)審制度的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)基礎(chǔ)上,對我國的日落復(fù)審制度的完善及我國出口企業(yè)應(yīng)對美國、歐盟等國的日落復(fù)審提出筆者的建議。 第一部分為反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的基礎(chǔ)理論。首先介紹反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的內(nèi)涵,然后指出反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的理論基礎(chǔ)、基本特征與現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,并在此基礎(chǔ)上分析美國、歐盟反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的緣起。該部分是全文的理論基礎(chǔ),重點(diǎn)論述反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的理論基礎(chǔ)、基本特征及其現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 第二部分為美國與歐盟反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的程序性規(guī)則分析與比較。首先詳細(xì)分析美國日落復(fù)審制度的程序性規(guī)則,并配以圖表說明,同時(shí)分析歐盟日落復(fù)審制度的程序性規(guī)定,然后實(shí)證分析美國、歐盟日落復(fù)審程序性規(guī)則在案例中的體現(xiàn),并在此基礎(chǔ)上對美國、歐盟日落復(fù)審制度程序性規(guī)則進(jìn)行比較評析。 第三部分為美國與歐盟反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的實(shí)體性規(guī)則比較。研究思路同第二部分,首先詳細(xì)分析美國日落復(fù)審制度的實(shí)體性規(guī)則,同時(shí)分析歐盟日落復(fù)審制度的實(shí)體性規(guī)定,然后實(shí)證分析美國、歐盟日落復(fù)審實(shí)體性規(guī)則在案例中的體現(xiàn),并在此基礎(chǔ)上對美國、歐盟日落復(fù)審制度實(shí)體性規(guī)則進(jìn)行比較評析。 第四部分為我國反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的建設(shè)與完善。該部分從兩個(gè)角度來論述,一是借鑒美歐成功經(jīng)驗(yàn),擯棄其缺點(diǎn),對我國反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的建設(shè)與完善提出針對性的觀點(diǎn),二是對我國出口企業(yè)應(yīng)對美歐日落復(fù)審調(diào)查提出建議。 結(jié)語部分提出WTO為修改日落復(fù)審制度在多哈回合中的努力和嘗試,留待以后研究。我國作為正在崛起的發(fā)展中大國,在WTO中的話語權(quán)越來越重要,未來有關(guān)日落復(fù)審制度的談判中,我國必然不能避免美歐等大國對WTO日落復(fù)審制度的推進(jìn)抑或影響作用。正視這種影響也是我國日落復(fù)審制度建設(shè)與完善不可或缺的課題。
[Abstract]:One of the measures of anti-dumping relief as a member of the WTO most commonly used legal three trade, has been generally acknowledged by WTO and members. However, the anti-dumping in the protection of the healthy development of domestic industry at the same time, some member states have gradually exploited its rules loopholes in evolution of anti-dumping rules become a tool of trade protectionism in order to prevent the anti-dumping measures indefinitely, WTO introduced in the sunset review system of anti-dumping rules. The establishment of the sunset review system changes in the principles of fairness and justice and the situation on the basis of the principles, the purpose is to make anti-dumping measures to continue execution will produce unfair results or the current situation at home and misfits. To the "sunset" as invalid. However, in many cases the sunset review process from WTO anti dumping agreement and the introduction of sunset review system in the trade practice, Japan Fall into the review system did not fully achieve the desired results, but for the implementation of the anti-dumping measures limit the unreasonable delay of legal means. Among these, the United States and the European Union legislation. The most representative two economies in the United States and the European Union as the world's largest, at the same time as China's most the two most important trading partner in the use of trade remedy measures, especially with rich and mature experience in the development and implementation of the sunset review of the legal system, to other countries and WTO itself had a profound impact, and in our country has just started, China's "anti dumping regulations. For the sunset review only the framework of principle, many contents are under exploration. Therefore, it is necessary to reference and the sunset review.
Besides the introduction and conclusion, is divided into four parts. The comprehensive use of empirical analysis, comparative analysis, statistical analysis method to study, in the review, comparison to the United States and the European Union sunset review system, to improve China's sunset review system and China's export enterprises to deal with the United States, the author puts forward recommended the sunset review of the EU and other countries.
The first part is the basic theory of anti-dumping sunset review system. First introduces the connotation of anti-dumping sunset review system, and pointed out the theoretical basis of antidumping sunset review system, the basic characteristics and practical significance, and based on the analysis of the United States, the origin of the EU anti-dumping sunset review system. This part is the theoretical basis of the thesis. Focuses on the theoretical basis of antidumping sunset review system, the basic characteristics and practical significance.
The second part is the United States and the EU anti-dumping sunset review system analysis and comparison of the procedural rules. The first detailed analysis of the sunset review system of the procedural rules, and with illustrations, and the analysis procedure of the sunset review system, and then an empirical analysis of the United States, the rules of sunset review procedures embodied in the case of the EU the United States, and on this basis, a comparative analysis of the procedural rules of the sunset review system.
The third part is the comparison of substantive rules in the United States and the European Union anti-dumping sunset review system. The research ideas with the second part, the first detailed analysis of the substantive rules of American sunset review system, and analysis of the substantive provisions of the EU sunset review system, and then an empirical analysis of the United States, the European Union embodies the sunset review substantive rules in the case. And on the basis of the comparative analysis of the EU, the sunset review system of substantive rules.
The fourth part is the construction of China's anti-dumping sunset review system and perfect. This part from two aspects, one is the reference and successful experience, abandon the disadvantages of the construction of China's anti-dumping sunset review system and put forward pertinent opinions, two of our recommendations to the United States and Europe a survey the sunset review of export enterprises.
The conclusion part puts forward WTO efforts and attempts to modify the sunset review system in the Doha round, for later research. China as a rising developing country, in the WTO's voice is more and more important, the future negotiations on the sunset review system in our country, the United States and Europe and other countries will not avoid the WTO sunset review system the propulsion or the influence of subject. This kind of impact is China's construction and perfection of the sunset review system is indispensable.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王春業(yè);;從國務(wù)院稅收立法權(quán)談授權(quán)立法監(jiān)督的新思路[J];福建行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

，

本文編號：1581166