本文選題：歐盟　切入點：反補貼　出處：《湖南師范大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：反補貼司法審查制度是針對反補貼調(diào)查及裁決的基本救濟制度。WTO《補貼與反補貼措施協(xié)定》第23條明確要求各成員在其國內(nèi)立法中建立并逐步完善反補貼司法審查制度。歐盟的反補貼司法審查制度經(jīng)過多年的司法實踐和判例的充實,到今天已經(jīng)相當完善和成熟,對我國具有直接的借鑒作用。 本文除緒論和結(jié)語外,共有六章： 第一章界定了反補貼司法審查的概念,并從宏觀上闡述了歐盟的相關(guān)立法規(guī)定,接著分析了歐盟確立該制度的正當性依據(jù),闡述了歐盟反補貼司法審查制度與WTO爭端解決機制的關(guān)系。 第二章至第四章分別介紹了歐盟反補貼司法審查的主體、受案范圍和審查標準,著重闡述的是適格原告享有訴權(quán)的前提和具體的原告種類,逐一具體介紹了在歐盟能提起司法審查的反補貼具體事項,分析了歐盟法院對于歐盟反補貼行政機構(gòu)的自由裁量權(quán)的態(tài)度和在具體實踐中所采取的具體審查標準。司法審查的主體、受案范圍和審查標準這三個問題是歐盟反補貼司法審查制度的核心問題,結(jié)合大量案例進行分析,并從比較法的角度將歐盟的規(guī)定與美國和WTO的規(guī)定作了一定比較。 第五章闡述了歐盟反補貼司法審查的四種訴訟類型,即相關(guān)利害關(guān)系人可以以何種形式提起司法審查,它們分別是：無效之訴、不作為之訴、損害賠償之訴和先行裁決。關(guān)于訴訟類型,這是反補貼司法審查中歐盟所特有的一項內(nèi)容。 第六章討論“我國反補貼司法審查制度及其完善”。雖然我國已初步建立反補貼司法審查制度,但尚有缺陷,主要表現(xiàn)在立法層次偏低、受案范圍相對狹窄、審查標準過于嚴格等方面。我國應(yīng)按照WTO規(guī)則的要求,借鑒歐盟的相關(guān)立法和實踐經(jīng)驗,進一步完善我國的反補貼司法審查制度,以適應(yīng)我國對外貿(mào)易新發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實需要。
[Abstract]:Countervailing Judicial Review system is the basic relief system for countervailing investigation and adjudication. Article 23 of the WTO Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures explicitly requires members to establish and gradually improve the judicial review of countervailing in their domestic legislation. The EU's countervailing judicial review system has been enriched by years of judicial practice and jurisprudence. Today has been quite perfect and mature, China has a direct reference role. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are six chapters:. The first chapter defines the concept of countervailing judicial review, and from the macro point of view of the relevant EU legislative provisions, and then analyzes the legitimacy of the European Union to establish the system. This paper expounds the relationship between EU countervailing judicial review system and WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Chapter two to Chapter 4th respectively introduces the subject, the scope of the case and the standard of review of the EU countervailing judicial review, focusing on the premise and the specific types of plaintiffs that the suitably plaintiff has the right of action. One by one, it introduces the specific issues of countervailing which can be subject to judicial review in the EU. This paper analyzes the European Court's attitude towards the discretion of EU countervailing administrative bodies and the specific standards adopted in practice. The scope of the case and the standard of examination are the core issues of the judicial review system of countervailing subsidy in EU. This paper analyzes a large number of cases and compares the EU regulations with those of the United States and WTO from the perspective of comparative law. Chapter 5th elaborates four kinds of litigation types of EU countervailing judicial review, that is, the relevant interested parties can bring judicial review in what form, they are: the action of invalidity, the action of omission. As to the type of litigation, this is a special content of EU in the judicial review of countervailing. Chapter 6th discusses "our country countervailing judicial review system and its consummation". Although our country has initially established the countervailing judicial review system, but there are still defects, mainly in the low legislative level, relatively narrow scope of cases. In accordance with the requirements of WTO rules, our country should learn from the relevant legislation and practical experience of the European Union to further improve the judicial review system of countervailing measures in order to meet the practical needs of the new development of China's foreign trade.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李濱;;從歐盟反托拉斯規(guī)則的司法審查看中國《反壟斷法》之完善[J];東方法學;2011年01期

2 孔祥俊;反傾銷司法審查制度之比較——兼談反傾銷司法解釋的理解和適用[J];法律適用;2003年Z1期

3 單一;;反補貼措施的司法審查[J];法律適用;2007年06期

4 蔣小紅;歐共體反補貼立法與實踐[J];法學評論;2003年01期

5 黃澗秋;論反傾銷司法審查制度[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2003年04期

6 袁勇,朱淑娣;WTO體制下貿(mào)易救濟司法審查制度的基本屬性[J];河南商業(yè)高等專科學校學報;2005年03期

7 黃文旭;;歐盟反補貼調(diào)查的趨勢及我國的應(yīng)對策略[J];南昌大學學報(人文社會科學版);2010年06期

8 郭蕊;;行政自由裁量權(quán)司法控制探論[J];濮陽職業(yè)技術(shù)學院學報;2010年01期

9 托馬斯·弗萊納,馮軍;兩大法系中的行政法治與司法的作用[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2002年01期

10 方小敏;論歐共體對反傾銷措施的司法審查制度[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2003年03期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前6條

1 陳炫竹;我國反傾銷司法審查制度研究[D];鄭州大學;2011年

2 楊春光;WTO協(xié)議有關(guān)司法審查規(guī)定的初探[D];中國政法大學;2004年

3 劉東剛;WTO與司法審查的變革[D];中國政法大學;2005年

4 李媛媛;論WTO過渡期后我國司法審查制度的完善[D];華東師范大學;2008年

5 劉慧玲;歐美反傾銷司法審查制度比較研究[D];湖南大學;2009年

6 陳鋒;WTO體制中司法審查制度的實證分析研究[D];上海交通大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1580389