本文選題：歐盟法　切入點(diǎn)：在線貨物買賣法指令　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：歐盟作為全球最具代表性的區(qū)域一體化國(guó)際組織,長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)致力于實(shí)現(xiàn)更進(jìn)一步的內(nèi)部市場(chǎng)一體化進(jìn)程。但在實(shí)踐中,通常面臨不同國(guó)家地區(qū)之間不同法律規(guī)范所帶來(lái)的交易規(guī)則之差異,這亦是長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)制約歐盟地區(qū)單一市場(chǎng)形成的主要原因。2015年12月,歐盟委員會(huì)為取代夭折的《歐盟統(tǒng)一銷售法草案》,針對(duì)性的提出了適用于遠(yuǎn)程貨物交易領(lǐng)域的《在線貨物買賣法指令》草案,踏出了歐盟單一數(shù)字市場(chǎng)建設(shè)過(guò)程中的重要一步。本文通過(guò)對(duì)該指令所涉及的立法背景、適用方式及調(diào)整方法、瑕疵擔(dān)保制度優(yōu)化以及在線糾紛解決制度等問(wèn)題的研究,探索其規(guī)則制度,嘗試對(duì)我國(guó)相關(guān)法律制度的優(yōu)化調(diào)整提供理論參考建議。本文由引言,正文,結(jié)論組成。正文共分為四章:第一章為歐盟及《在線貨物買賣法指令》草案概述,主要是對(duì)歐盟及《指令》的背景進(jìn)行介紹,包括歐盟及其立法現(xiàn)狀、歐盟單一數(shù)字市場(chǎng)之愿景以及《指令》之前身《歐盟統(tǒng)一銷售法草案》的相關(guān)內(nèi)容,并就《指令》的框架內(nèi)容作了概括性介紹。第二章為《在線貨物買賣法指令》的適用方式及調(diào)整范圍,《指令》較為罕見的采取了完全一致之標(biāo)準(zhǔn),即要求成員國(guó)轉(zhuǎn)化國(guó)內(nèi)法必須完全一致,既不允許成員國(guó)規(guī)定過(guò)嚴(yán),也不允許規(guī)定過(guò)寬的轉(zhuǎn)化規(guī)定。另一方面,《指令》將調(diào)整范圍限定于B2C領(lǐng)域的跨境遠(yuǎn)程貨物交易范疇內(nèi),相對(duì)具體狹窄的調(diào)整范圍使得其內(nèi)容更具針對(duì)性,我國(guó)《電子商務(wù)法》草案在調(diào)整范圍方面亦可從中借鑒有價(jià)值的制度規(guī)則。第三章為《在線貨物買賣法指令》瑕疵擔(dān)保制度研究,進(jìn)一步就《指令》所針對(duì)的瑕疵擔(dān)保制度進(jìn)行了闡釋分析,集中針對(duì)《指令》在瑕疵擔(dān)保制度上的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)及具備討論價(jià)值的部分進(jìn)行了研究,并從《指令》出發(fā)對(duì)我國(guó)瑕疵擔(dān)保制度的重構(gòu)進(jìn)行了思考。第四章為《在線貨物買賣法指令》之糾紛解決機(jī)制研究,主要探討了在《指令》框架下的ODR糾紛解決機(jī)制的必要性可行性并對(duì)其適用進(jìn)行了闡釋,進(jìn)一步探討在我國(guó)ODR糾紛解決機(jī)制的架構(gòu)過(guò)程中可以從中汲取的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)。
[Abstract]:The regional integration of international organizations as the most representative of the world, has long been committed to achieve further integration of the internal market process. But in practice, usually face the differences arising from different legal norms of the trading rules between different countries and regions, it is also the main reason of restricting.2015 for a long time the EU single market formed by the year in December, the European Commission to replace an EU uniform sales law > < draft, put forward the application in the field of remote goods transactions online sale of Goods Act > < draft directive, an important step in the process of stepping out of the EU single market digital construction. Through the legislative background involved in the instruction, application the way and methods of adjustment, study and solve the problem such as the system guarantee system flaw optimization and online dispute, explore its rules and regulations, tried on the related law of China law system To provide a theoretical reference suggestion of adjustment and optimization. This paper consists of introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is the European Union and the online sale of Goods Act > < instruction draft outline, mainly carries on the introduction to the European Union and the "Instruction > background, including the European Union and its legislative status, the related content of the EU single digital market the vision and the instruction of EU < < > formerly unified sales law >, and < > the command frame content and made a general introduction. The second chapter is applicable law > < instruction online for the sale of goods and the adjustment range, < > directive rare take standard completely consistent, which requires members in the transformation of domestic law must be completely consistent, not only does not allow member states too strict, also does not allow the provisions of conversion provisions wide. On the other hand, < > instruction will be adjusted to limit the scope of the field of cross-border transactions in goods B2C remote areas with relatively The adjustment range of body narrow make its contents more targeted, China's e-commerce law draft in < > the adjustment range can learn from the valuable rules. The third chapter is the "online sale of goods research method instruction > warranty system, explains the analysis further instructions for < > flaw the guarantee system, focus on" instruction > in warranty system on innovation and has discussed the value on the part of the study, and from the instruction of < > reconstruction of our warranty system of thinking. The fourth chapter is the method of online instruction < > dispute settlement mechanism of the sale of goods, the necessity of solving the main mechanism discussed in the < > instruction under the framework of ODR disputes and explains its application, to further explore the advanced experience of solving mechanism in the ODR dispute in our country in the process of architecture can learn from.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳志忠;試析英國(guó)貨物買賣法之改進(jìn)[J];中南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

2 ;國(guó)際貨物買賣法概述[J];國(guó)際化工信息;2005年08期

3 洪德;;英美的貨物買賣法[J];政治與法律;1985年06期

4 王衛(wèi)國(guó);瑞典新《貨物買賣法》的主要特點(diǎn)[J];比較法研究;1992年Z1期

5 沈禹鈞;英國(guó)貨物買賣法義務(wù)條款分類界定的最新發(fā)展[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2000年03期

6 潘華仿;英國(guó)貨物買賣法概說(shuō)[J];比較法研究;1990年04期

7 徐國(guó)建;聯(lián)合國(guó)國(guó)際貨物銷售合同公約的國(guó)際統(tǒng)一適用──評(píng)馬格努斯的《聯(lián)合國(guó)國(guó)際貨物買賣法釋義》一書[J];外國(guó)法譯評(píng);1995年04期

8 葉強(qiáng);;從“買方謹(jǐn)慎”到“賣方謹(jǐn)慎”——談?dòng)?guó)貨物買賣法下的默示條款[J];國(guó)際商法論叢;2004年00期

9 克里斯廷·A·羅伊斯—路易斯;梁慧星;;英國(guó)關(guān)于消費(fèi)者安全的法律[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;1990年04期

10 吳冠雄;英國(guó)貨物買賣法的新發(fā)展——評(píng)介《1994年貨物銷售和提供法》[J];中外法學(xué);1999年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 陸斯嘉;英國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)：法規(guī)保護(hù)與行業(yè)自律[N];東方早報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張行健;歐盟《在線貨物買賣法指令》法律問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2017年

2 楊冬玲;國(guó)際貨物買賣法和國(guó)際海上貨物運(yùn)輸法的協(xié)同研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1569877