本文選題：國本主義　切入點(diǎn)：人本主義　出處：《武漢大學(xué)》2014年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：人本主義作為一種元話語,不僅是一種價值觀,也是一種認(rèn)識論和方法論；人本主義之于國際法,可以提供一種新的價值尺度與分析框架。 現(xiàn)有國際法規(guī)則體系,以國家為權(quán)力與義務(wù)主體,“國本主義”主導(dǎo)其主流價值與制度設(shè)計,“人本主義”較之“國本主義”作為低位階規(guī)范,尚未對國際法的價值導(dǎo)向與認(rèn)知方法產(chǎn)生實(shí)質(zhì)性影響。本文以“人本主義”為分析工具,對現(xiàn)有國際法規(guī)則進(jìn)行梳理,對人本化是否是國際法的應(yīng)然趨勢與必然歸宿?還是烏托邦的幻想?國際法現(xiàn)有的人本因素是否是對人本化的顯示與詮釋?人本化將在國際法規(guī)范中如何加以推進(jìn)?國際法的各部門規(guī)則將受到人本化的何種影響?等國際法人本化的問題譜系進(jìn)行縱深性地研究,從而全面審視現(xiàn)有國際法規(guī)范的價值準(zhǔn)則與制度規(guī)范。
[Abstract]:As a kind of meta discourse, humanism is not only a kind of values, but also an epistemology and methodology. The existing system of rules of international law takes the state as the subject of power and obligation, and "nationalism" dominates its mainstream value and system design, and humanism is regarded as a low-ranking norm compared with "nationalism". It has not yet had a substantial impact on the value orientation and cognitive method of international law. This paper uses humanism as an analytical tool to sort out the existing rules of international law, and whether humanization is the necessary trend and inevitable destination of international law? Or utopian fantasy? Are the existing humanist factors in international law the manifestation and interpretation of humanization? How to promote humanization in the norms of international law? How will the sectoral rules of international law be affected by humanization? The humanization of international law is studied in depth, and the values and institutional norms of the existing norms of international law are comprehensively examined.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D998.2
，

本文編號：1569683