發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-04 01:15

  本文選題：國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任　切入點(diǎn)：國(guó)際犯罪　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：國(guó)家責(zé)任是國(guó)際法早已確立的一項(xiàng)重要原則,但國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任至今尚未在國(guó)際法律法規(guī)中出現(xiàn),也沒(méi)有在國(guó)際刑法界形成共識(shí),國(guó)際刑事審判實(shí)踐中亦未出現(xiàn)過(guò)追究國(guó)家的國(guó)際犯罪刑事責(zé)任的實(shí)例。但是法律具有實(shí)然性和應(yīng)然性兩種評(píng)判標(biāo)準(zhǔn),實(shí)然性的缺失并不能否認(rèn)應(yīng)然性的價(jià)值,現(xiàn)階段對(duì)國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任的豁免,并不能妨礙我們探討確立國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任的價(jià)值,而且從國(guó)際社會(huì)實(shí)踐來(lái)看,確立國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任已迫在眉睫。 刑事責(zé)任是犯罪所產(chǎn)生的法律后果,任何犯罪主體實(shí)施了犯罪行為就應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的法律后果。國(guó)家作為國(guó)際法的主體,其實(shí)施的國(guó)際犯罪活動(dòng)亦應(yīng)受到相應(yīng)的國(guó)際刑事法律責(zé)難。本文根據(jù)國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任問(wèn)題的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展,分析了諸多學(xué)者針對(duì)國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任問(wèn)題所產(chǎn)生的理論爭(zhēng)議,并立足于刑法的精神和原理,著眼于國(guó)際社會(huì)實(shí)踐,對(duì)確立國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任的價(jià)值做一個(gè)綜合的探析。 本文分為： 引言：從2010年朝韓兩國(guó)局部武裝戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)引發(fā)國(guó)際刑事法院進(jìn)行戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)罪行調(diào)查這一國(guó)際性事件引出國(guó)際法上爭(zhēng)論的幾個(gè)焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,點(diǎn)出本文的創(chuàng)作意圖和理論價(jià)值。 第一章：闡述國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任問(wèn)題的概說(shuō),以明確國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任的概念、特征、由來(lái)和發(fā)展。 第二章：研究國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任問(wèn)題的理論爭(zhēng)議,通過(guò)分析比較兩種對(duì)立的觀點(diǎn),闡述確立國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任的理論依據(jù)和理論價(jià)值。 第三章：結(jié)合國(guó)際上實(shí)際,進(jìn)一步詳細(xì)論述確立國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任在維護(hù)國(guó)際社會(huì)秩序、捍衛(wèi)人類和平安寧、保護(hù)世界自然環(huán)境以及預(yù)防國(guó)家違法犯罪方面的現(xiàn)實(shí)價(jià)值。 結(jié)語(yǔ)：對(duì)全文做一個(gè)大致的總結(jié),并展望確立國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任的理論前景。
[Abstract]:State responsibility is an important principle which has long been established in international law. However, the criminal responsibility of States has not yet appeared in international laws and regulations, nor has it formed a consensus in the international criminal law community. In the practice of international criminal trial, there have been no examples of investigating the criminal responsibility of a country for an international crime. However, the law has two kinds of judging standards, that is, materiality and necessity, and the lack of materiality cannot deny the value of due nature. The immunity from state criminal responsibility at the present stage can not prevent us from discussing the value of establishing state criminal responsibility, and from the practice of international society, it is urgent to establish state criminal responsibility. Criminal liability is the legal consequence of crime. Any criminal subject who commits a crime should bear the corresponding legal consequences. The state is the subject of international law. According to the emergence and development of the problem of national criminal responsibility, this paper analyzes the theoretical disputes of many scholars on the problem of national criminal responsibility. Based on the spirit and principle of criminal law and focusing on the practice of international society, this paper makes a comprehensive analysis on the value of establishing national criminal responsibility. This article is divided into:. Introduction: from 2010, the international incident of the International Criminal Court to investigate the war crimes caused by the partial armed war between the two countries leads to several controversial issues in international law, and points out the creative intention and theoretical value of this paper. Chapter one: to clarify the concept, characteristics, origin and development of state criminal responsibility. The second chapter studies the theory dispute of the national criminal responsibility, through analyzing and comparing the two opposing viewpoints, expounds the theoretical basis and the theoretical value of establishing the state criminal responsibility. Chapter three: combined with the international reality, the paper further discusses in detail the practical value of establishing national criminal responsibility in maintaining the international social order, safeguarding the peace and tranquility of mankind, protecting the natural environment of the world and preventing the state from breaking the law and committing crimes. Conclusion: a general summary of the full text, and prospects for the establishment of national criminal responsibility theory prospects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 嵇建國(guó);;國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任初探[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年04期

2 張瑋;;論國(guó)際刑事責(zé)任的主體——淺析國(guó)家不承擔(dān)國(guó)際刑事責(zé)任[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年13期

3 馮艷昌;何山;;淺論國(guó)際刑事責(zé)任[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年21期

4 舒洪水;賈宇;;論國(guó)際犯罪主體的范圍與特征[J];河北法學(xué);2008年09期

5 張晶,閆亞鵬;關(guān)于國(guó)家的國(guó)際刑事責(zé)任問(wèn)題探析[J];理論界;2004年04期

6 王虎華;國(guó)家刑事責(zé)任的國(guó)際法批判[J];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院學(xué)術(shù)季刊;2002年04期

7 李壽平;論國(guó)家的國(guó)際刑事責(zé)任[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期

8 蔣娜;;國(guó)際刑事責(zé)任的多元主體及其啟示——以國(guó)際刑事責(zé)任原則的嶄新進(jìn)展為視角[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2010年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1563502