本文關(guān)鍵詞： 跨國(guó)破產(chǎn) 管轄權(quán)確定 管轄權(quán)沖突　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：相對(duì)于20世紀(jì)80年代的跨國(guó)收購(gòu)與兼并熱而言,90年代出現(xiàn)并持續(xù)至今的跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)熱引起了理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界更多的關(guān)注。跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)涉及的法律問(wèn)題十分復(fù)雜,主要包括破產(chǎn)的管轄權(quán)、破產(chǎn)的法律適用、破產(chǎn)的域外效力、對(duì)外國(guó)破產(chǎn)的承認(rèn)與協(xié)助、外國(guó)債權(quán)人的地位和待遇等問(wèn)題。我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法學(xué)界對(duì)跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)研究起步較晚,且研究成果多側(cè)重于破產(chǎn)域外效力的討論,也有一些涉及到跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)的法律適用,但在管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題方面鮮有觸及。然而管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題又是跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域諸多法律問(wèn)題中的重中之重,管轄權(quán)對(duì)法律選擇的決定性很大,一國(guó)法院的判決具有域外效力,并得到其他國(guó)家承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的首要條件是審理案件的法院對(duì)案件具有管轄權(quán)。所以,本文擬對(duì)管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析,并尋求解決管轄權(quán)沖突的合理途徑。 論文結(jié)構(gòu)分為三部分,主要圍繞傳統(tǒng)國(guó)際民商事管轄權(quán)理論在跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)中的適用、跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突的成因分析及現(xiàn)存解決途徑這三個(gè)方面來(lái)論述,最后對(duì)我國(guó)在跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)方面的問(wèn)題展開(kāi)法理思考與實(shí)證分析。 第一部分闡述了跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)理論與確定依據(jù)。首先,指出管轄權(quán)確定的重要意義。然后,探討國(guó)際民商事管轄權(quán)在跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域的適用,劃分以“屬地”為基礎(chǔ)的管轄原則和以“屬人”為基礎(chǔ)的管轄原則,分別就不同的管轄依據(jù)進(jìn)行闡述說(shuō)明與利弊分析。 第二部分從不同角度分析跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突產(chǎn)生的原因。主要包括案件的國(guó)際性、當(dāng)事人訴訟動(dòng)機(jī)、各國(guó)立法差異以及各國(guó)司法態(tài)度等諸多因素。進(jìn)而,對(duì)目前國(guó)際國(guó)內(nèi)對(duì)跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)案件管轄權(quán)沖突的解決方法進(jìn)行探究,梳理其基本規(guī)定,分析其優(yōu)劣之處。 第三部分落腳到我國(guó)在跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題上的基本規(guī)定與基本態(tài)度。主要從我國(guó)在跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題上的立法現(xiàn)狀與司法實(shí)踐切入,剖析其暴露出的問(wèn)題,從而為我國(guó)今后在跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題上提出立法建議。
[Abstract]:Compared with the transnational takeover and merger fever in 1980s, the transnational bankruptcy fever that appeared in the 1990s and continues to this day has attracted more attention in the theoretical and practical circles. The legal issues involved in transnational bankruptcy are very complex. It mainly includes the jurisdiction of bankruptcy, the application of bankruptcy law, the extraterritorial effect of bankruptcy, the recognition and assistance to foreign bankruptcy, the status and treatment of foreign creditors, and so on. Moreover, the research results focus on the discussion of the extraterritorial effects of bankruptcy, and some of them are related to the legal application of transnational bankruptcy. However, jurisdiction is one of the most important legal issues in the field of transnational bankruptcy. Jurisdiction is a decisive factor in the choice of law, and the judgments of a country's courts have extraterritorial effects. The first condition of recognition and enforcement in other countries is that the court hearing the case has jurisdiction over the case. Therefore, this paper intends to analyze the jurisdiction and seek a reasonable way to resolve the conflict of jurisdiction. The structure of the thesis is divided into three parts: the application of the traditional theory of international civil and commercial jurisdiction in transnational bankruptcy, the analysis of the causes of the conflict of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction and the existing solutions. At last, the author makes a legal thinking and empirical analysis on the transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction in China. The first part expounds the theory and determination basis of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction. Firstly, it points out the significance of jurisdiction determination. Then, it discusses the application of international civil and commercial jurisdiction in the field of transnational bankruptcy. This paper divides jurisdiction principle based on "territory" and jurisdiction principle based on "personality", and explains and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of different jurisdiction bases. The second part analyzes the causes of the conflict of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction from different angles. It mainly includes the internationality of the case, the motive of litigants, the legislative differences of countries and the judicial attitude of various countries. This paper probes into the methods of solving the jurisdiction conflict of transnational bankruptcy cases at home and abroad, combs its basic provisions and analyzes its advantages and disadvantages. The third part focuses on the basic regulations and attitudes of our country on transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction, mainly from the current legislative situation and judicial practice of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction in our country, and analyzes the problems exposed by it. In order to our country in the future on the issue of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction to put forward legislative recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅劍雯;論歐盟民商事管轄權(quán)體系對(duì)協(xié)調(diào)我國(guó)區(qū)際民商事管轄權(quán)沖突的啟示[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2004年03期

2 朱景文;歐盟法對(duì)法律全球化的意義[J];法學(xué);2001年12期

3 郭樹(shù)理;國(guó)際民商事管轄權(quán)沖突及其救濟(jì)——對(duì)中國(guó)實(shí)踐的考察[J];法學(xué);2000年07期

4 張憲初;內(nèi)地與香港民商事案件管轄權(quán)沖突芻議[J];法律適用;2004年09期

5 高江南;現(xiàn)代國(guó)際法與國(guó)際民商事訴訟管轄權(quán)沖突的解決[J];法律適用;2003年11期

6 黃進(jìn);鄒國(guó)勇;;歐盟民商事管轄權(quán)規(guī)則的嬗變——從《布魯塞爾公約》到《布魯塞爾條例》[J];東岳論叢;2006年05期

7 王淑敏,王秀芬;論國(guó)際民商事訴訟管轄權(quán)的消極沖突[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2004年06期

8 林銳鑫,陳曉廣;淺析英國(guó)民商事管轄權(quán)制度[J];河北法學(xué);2003年01期

9 王霖華;國(guó)際民事訴訟中的協(xié)議管轄問(wèn)題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2002年02期

10 郭樹(shù)理;歐盟統(tǒng)一國(guó)際破產(chǎn)法運(yùn)動(dòng)的最新進(jìn)展[J];歐洲;2001年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 錢鋒;論外國(guó)法院民商事判決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 孫端陽(yáng);論跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)的域外效力[D];大連海事大學(xué);2008年

2 于文娟;跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突及其解決途徑[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

3 周芬;論國(guó)際私法上意思自治原則的擴(kuò)展[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

4 藺旭;跨國(guó)銀行破產(chǎn)國(guó)際協(xié)作法律問(wèn)題研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

5 于海龍;破產(chǎn)的域外效力問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2006年

6 黃誠(chéng);論跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)的域外效力[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1550134