本文關(guān)鍵詞： 南海仲裁案 國際批判法學(xué) 國家政治 虛假的國際主義　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：南海仲裁案深刻地蘊(yùn)含著法律與政治之間的關(guān)系。國際法中的政治主要是指國家政治,即國家根據(jù)自身利益和意志而行動。國際法中還存在由超越國家政治的組織來調(diào)整國家行為的理想,這種理想屬于國際主義。然而在現(xiàn)實(shí)中,國際主義往往被國家政治所利用,從而產(chǎn)生了虛假的國際主義。虛假的國際主義是貌似合法但實(shí)質(zhì)上不正當(dāng)?shù)膰艺�。菲律賓、臨時仲裁庭和美國、日本都屬于虛假的國際主義,分別對應(yīng)工具的國際主義、錯誤的國際主義和虛偽的國際主義。國際批判法學(xué)揭示了這三者所涉法律背后的政治。
[Abstract]:The South China Sea arbitration case contains a profound relationship between law and politics. Politics in international law mainly refers to national politics. That is, the State acts according to its own interests and will. In international law, there is also the ideal of the organization that transcends the politics of the State to adjust the conduct of the state, which belongs to internationalism. In reality, however, internationalism is often exploited by the politics of the State. Thus, false internationalism. False internationalism is a seemingly legal but substantially illegitimate national politics. The Philippines, the temporary Arbitration Tribunal, the United States and Japan all belong to false internationalism, which corresponds to instrumentalism, respectively. False internationalism and hypocritical internationalism. International critical jurisprudence reveals the politics behind these three laws.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D993.5
，

本文編號：1547757