本文關(guān)鍵詞： 釣魚島爭(zhēng)端 領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端 國際司法解決　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：釣魚島爭(zhēng)端是中日之間懸而未決的領(lǐng)土主權(quán)爭(zhēng)端。中國一貫主張通過和平談判協(xié)商的政治方法解決之，并針對(duì)性地提出了“擱置爭(zhēng)議、共同開發(fā)”的政策主張。然從當(dāng)下形勢(shì)觀之，日本對(duì)中國此重大善意舉措并無積極響應(yīng)，近年來仍以各種方式強(qiáng)化對(duì)釣魚島的占領(lǐng)，使釣魚島爭(zhēng)端日趨復(fù)雜化。本文嘗試探索適用國際司法解決釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的可能性，并分析國際司法解決釣魚島爭(zhēng)端應(yīng)注意的實(shí)體法和程序法問題，以期為釣魚島爭(zhēng)端解決提供另一種思路。本文共分為五部分： 第一部分：主要介紹釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的概況。釣魚島的自然資源狀況是爭(zhēng)端緣起的經(jīng)濟(jì)原因，而《聯(lián)合國海洋法公約》關(guān)于島嶼和專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)的規(guī)定則是爭(zhēng)端緣起的法律根源。對(duì)于釣魚島的主權(quán)歸屬，多年來中日雙方一直堅(jiān)持各自的主張并提出了相關(guān)的依據(jù)。 第二部分：分析國際司法解決領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端的優(yōu)越性與局限性。國際司法解決領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端從適用的法律、程序規(guī)則、判決的執(zhí)行、爭(zhēng)端的最終解決來看，具有一定的優(yōu)越性。但同時(shí)與政治方法、國際仲裁相比，又存在一定的局限性。但總的來說，其在解決領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端中的獨(dú)特優(yōu)越性不容置疑，它解決了國際上一些歷經(jīng)多年政治談判仍停滯不前的爭(zhēng)端，并推動(dòng)了與領(lǐng)土有關(guān)的國際法的發(fā)展。 第三部分：國際司法解決釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的可能性分析。本部分首先運(yùn)用國際法與國際關(guān)系理論分析釣魚島爭(zhēng)端解決面臨的困境，指出戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)手段解決的不可取以及政治方法解決面臨瓶頸。然后結(jié)合釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的實(shí)際情況和國際司法解決領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端的特點(diǎn)，分析國際司法解決釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的合理性、必要性以及可行性，得出結(jié)論國際司法解決釣魚島爭(zhēng)端具有一定的現(xiàn)實(shí)可能性。 第四部分：分析國際司法解決釣魚島爭(zhēng)端應(yīng)關(guān)注的法律問題。通過國際司法解決釣魚島爭(zhēng)端會(huì)涉及到諸多的實(shí)體法和程序法問題，這些問題會(huì)影響到國際司法解決的最終結(jié)果。在實(shí)體法上應(yīng)關(guān)注有關(guān)條約法問題和有效控制原則問題；在程序法上應(yīng)關(guān)注日本的先決性抗辯問題、裁判的當(dāng)事人問題、證據(jù)問題中的證據(jù)的認(rèn)定和舉證責(zé)任規(guī)則。 第五部分：分析我國日后訴諸國際司法解決釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的時(shí)下作為。本部分針對(duì)前文所提及國際司法解決釣魚島爭(zhēng)端所涉及到的實(shí)體法和程序法問題以及結(jié)合釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的實(shí)際情況，，對(duì)我國日后通過國際司法途徑解決釣魚島爭(zhēng)端提出一些建議性主張。
[Abstract]:The dispute over the Diaoyu Islands is a pending territorial sovereignty dispute between China and Japan. China has always advocated a political solution through peaceful negotiations and consultation, and has specifically proposed to "shelve the dispute," From the perspective of the current situation, Japan has not responded positively to this major goodwill move by China. In recent years, it has intensified its occupation of the Diaoyu Islands in various ways. This paper attempts to explore the possibility of applying international judicial solution to the Diaoyu Islands dispute, and analyzes the substantive and procedural law problems that should be paid attention to in the international judicial settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute. This paper is divided into five parts:. The first part mainly introduces the general situation of the Diaoyu Islands dispute. The natural resources of the Diaoyu Islands are the economic reasons of the dispute. The provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on islands and exclusive economic zones are the legal source of the dispute. For the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands, China and Japan have been insisting on their own opinions and putting forward relevant bases for many years. Part II: analysis of the advantages and limitations of international judicial settlement of territorial disputes. International judicial settlement of territorial disputes from the applicable law, rules of procedure, the execution of judgments, the final settlement of disputes, Has some advantages, but at the same time compared with political methods and international arbitration, there are some limitations. But in general, its unique superiority in the settlement of territorial disputes is beyond doubt. It resolves some international disputes that have been stalled after years of political negotiations and promotes the development of international law relating to territories. The third part: the possibility analysis of international judicial settlement of Diaoyu Islands dispute. This part first uses international law and international relations theory to analyze the dilemma faced by the Diaoyu Islands dispute settlement. Pointing out that the solution of war means is not desirable and that the political method of settlement is facing the bottleneck. Then, combining the actual situation of the Diaoyu Islands dispute and the characteristics of international judicial settlement of territorial dispute, the reasonableness of international judicial settlement of Diaoyu Island dispute is analyzed. It is necessary and feasible to draw a conclusion that international judicial settlement of Diaoyu Island dispute has certain realistic possibility. Part 4th: analysis of the legal issues that should be paid attention to in the international judicial settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute. The international judicial settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute will involve many substantive and procedural issues. These issues will affect the final outcome of international judicial settlement. In substantive law, attention should be paid to issues relating to the law of treaties and the principle of effective control; in procedural law, attention should be paid to the question of Japan's priori defences, the parties to the decision, Identification of evidence and rules of burden of proof in evidence. Part 5th: the analysis of the international judicial settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute in the future. This part of the international judicial settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute referred to earlier issues of substantive law and procedural law and the combination of. The actual situation of the Diaoyu Islands dispute, Some suggestions are put forward to solve the Diaoyu Island dispute through international judicial channels in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D994

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許楚旭;;國際法院訴訟案件判決的執(zhí)行問題探析[J];北方法學(xué);2009年05期

2 梁詠;;從國際法視角看中日東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)端[J];法學(xué);2006年08期

3 管建強(qiáng);;和平解決東海劃界爭(zhēng)端之方法探究[J];法學(xué);2008年11期

4 蘇曉宏;決策理論與國際司法適用的國家選擇[J];國際觀察;2004年05期

5 張植榮;蛻變——釣魚島問題在臺(tái)灣[J];國際論壇;2003年04期

6 李輝 ,張學(xué)剛;印尼與馬來西亞安巴拉特領(lǐng)海爭(zhēng)端概況[J];國際資料信息;2005年05期

7 T.O.埃利亞斯;智明;;關(guān)于時(shí)際法的理論[J];法學(xué)研究資料;1981年04期

8 李先波,鄧婷婷;從國際法看中日釣魚島爭(zhēng)端[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2004年03期

9 王慶海;關(guān)于國際法中的時(shí)際法問題[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1991年06期

10 黃德明;黃峗琴;;從白礁島案看領(lǐng)土取得的有效控制原則[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王德水;從國際法視角看中日釣魚島之爭(zhēng)[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1539505