本文關(guān)鍵詞： 補貼 美國反補貼法 非市場經(jīng)濟國家 人民幣匯率　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：美國是世界上最早制定反補貼國內(nèi)法律的國家,經(jīng)過百年的發(fā)展其反補貼法內(nèi)容豐富、體系完備。1994年美國根據(jù)其在烏拉圭回合簽訂的SCM中承擔(dān)的義務(wù)對其國內(nèi)反補貼法進(jìn)行了重大修訂,最終出臺了《烏拉圭回合協(xié)議法》,這也標(biāo)志著美國反補貼法最終的完備。在美國反補貼法的發(fā)展過程中,一度形成了反補貼法不適用于非市場經(jīng)濟國家的傳統(tǒng),但是自從中國加入WTO之后,美國反補貼法發(fā)生了較大的變化。 2005年基于美國國內(nèi)外的政治、經(jīng)濟因素存在,美國對其反補貼法進(jìn)行了修改,美國眾議院通過了《美國貿(mào)易權(quán)利執(zhí)行法案》,該法案試圖授權(quán)對非市場經(jīng)濟國家適用反補貼法。雖然該法案最終沒有生效,但是在2006年其針對進(jìn)口自中國的銅版紙?zhí)崞鹆朔囱a貼調(diào)查,從此改變其反補貼法不適用于非市場經(jīng)濟國家的傳統(tǒng),在各界引起了廣泛爭論,尤其是在中國。2010年9月美國眾議院又通過了《匯率改革促進(jìn)公平貿(mào)易法案》。該法案的核心內(nèi)容是將操縱匯率列為禁止性的出口補貼,從而提出對匯率操縱國出口到美國的商品適用反補貼法的規(guī)定,征收反補貼稅。并且在該法案中,中國被列入到匯率操縱國目錄當(dāng)中。 本文分為五個部分: 引言中介紹了論文選題目的以及與本文研究相關(guān)的一些背景,指出了本文研究的框架、方法及意義所在。第一章詳細(xì)地介紹了美國反補貼法的演進(jìn)過程,并對美國反補貼法的特點做出歸納。 第二章介紹了美國國內(nèi)關(guān)于修改反補貼法的呼聲,并且從經(jīng)濟、法律、政治這三個角度分析了出現(xiàn)這種呼聲的原因。 第三章集中分析了2005年在美國國會眾議院修改通過的授權(quán)美國商務(wù)部將其反補貼法適用于來自非市場經(jīng)濟國家的進(jìn)口產(chǎn)品的《美國貿(mào)易權(quán)利執(zhí)行法案》,對該法案的內(nèi)容以及產(chǎn)生的影響進(jìn)行了論述,并且指出了中國的應(yīng)對之策。 第四章集中分析了2010年在美國國會眾議院通過的旨在將中國等匯率低估視為一種被禁止的出口補貼的《匯率改革促進(jìn)公平貿(mào)易法案》,分析了該法案產(chǎn)生的原因、條文內(nèi)容、潛在的影響等,從而提出了中國的應(yīng)對策略。
[Abstract]:The United States is the first country in the world to formulate anti-subsidy domestic laws. After a century of development, its countervailing laws are rich in content. In 1994, the United States made a major amendment to its domestic countervailing law in accordance with its obligations under the SCM signed in the Uruguay Round. Finally, the Uruguay Round Agreement Law was issued, which also marked the final completion of the United States countervailing law. In the course of the development of the United States countervailing law, there was once a tradition that the countervailing law was not applicable to non-market economy countries. But since China joined WTO, American countervailing law has changed greatly. In 2005, due to the existence of political and economic factors at home and abroad, the United States amended its countervailing law. The U.S. House of Representatives passed the U.S. Trade Rights Enforcement Act, which seeks to authorize the application of countervailing laws to non-market economies. In 2006, however, it launched a countervailing investigation on coated paper imported from China. Since then, it has changed its tradition of not applying its countervailing law to non-market economy countries, which has caused widespread controversy in various circles. Especially in China. In September 2010, the US House of Representatives passed the Exchange rate Reform for Fair Trade Act. The core of the bill is to make currency manipulation a prohibited export subsidy. Therefore, the application of countervailing law to goods exported to the United States by currency manipulators and the imposition of countervailing duties are proposed. In the Act, China is listed in the catalogue of exchange rate manipulators. This paper is divided into five parts:. The introduction introduces the purpose of the thesis and some background related to the research, and points out the framework, methods and significance of this study. Chapter 1 introduces the evolution of the United States countervailing law in detail. And the characteristics of the United States anti-subsidy law is summarized. The second chapter introduces the voice of amending the countervailing law in the United States, and analyzes the reasons from the three angles of economy, law and politics. Chapter three focuses on the United States Trade Rights Enforcement Act, which authorized the Department of Commerce to apply its countervailing laws to imports from non-market economy countries, which was amended and passed in the House of Representatives on 2005. The content of the case and its impact are discussed. And pointed out China's countermeasures. Chapter 4th focuses on the "Exchange rate Reform for Fair Trade Act", which was passed by the House of Representatives in 2010 to treat the undervaluation of exchange rates such as China as a prohibited export subsidy, and analyzes the reasons and contents of the bill. The potential impact and so on, thus proposed the Chinese response strategy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D971.2;DD912.29;D996.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王冰;美國對華鋼鐵業(yè)反補貼實證分析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1538250