我國商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口問題研究
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 平行進(jìn)口 商標(biāo) 國際貿(mào)易 出處:《南京師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:平行進(jìn)口(Parallel Import),是指在國際貿(mào)易中,當(dāng)某一知識產(chǎn)權(quán)獲得進(jìn)口國保護時,第三者未經(jīng)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)人或者獨占許可人的同意,所進(jìn)行的進(jìn)口并銷售該知識產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)品的行為。在商標(biāo)國際貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域發(fā)生的平行進(jìn)口就是商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口,商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口在國際市場非常普遍,已經(jīng)成為商標(biāo)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易中不可忽視的一部分。在商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的管理領(lǐng)域,各個國家都有著不同的政策,與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)定(TRIPS)等國際條約也將選擇權(quán)留給了各個國家。在這種國際大環(huán)境之下,中國對商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的態(tài)度并不明確。在我國商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口越發(fā)普遍的今天,如何認(rèn)識商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的效應(yīng)、管理商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口是當(dāng)前我國在國際貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域需要關(guān)注的重點和難點。 本文研究的是我國商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的效應(yīng)及管理政策選擇。首先,本文從商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的基本概念出發(fā),分析了商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的特點、形式、成因及主要效應(yīng),為本文建立了理論基礎(chǔ)。在此基礎(chǔ)上,針對我國商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口獨有的特點、形式和商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口管理政策,本文運用了微觀經(jīng)濟學(xué)相關(guān)的知識,建立了我國商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的基礎(chǔ)模型,并運用此模型系統(tǒng)分析了商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口對商標(biāo)市場的價格、數(shù)量影響及對市場各方主體福利、市場總福利的影響,以求達(dá)到探求我國商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口效應(yīng)的目的。此后,本文還針對我國的市場現(xiàn)狀,研究了我國商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的外部效應(yīng)和當(dāng)前管理政策造成的訴訟成本。通過這幾方面的分析,文章認(rèn)為商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口有著正面和負(fù)面的效應(yīng),而我國模糊政策也造成了市場的無效率。最后,文章將市場中的各種效應(yīng)進(jìn)行了綜合,建立了我國的選擇模型。 根據(jù)我國現(xiàn)狀,在大多數(shù)行業(yè),商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口造成的正面效應(yīng)大于負(fù)面效應(yīng)。因此,我國應(yīng)當(dāng)做出選擇,在原則上允許商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的基礎(chǔ)上,對這種行為進(jìn)行嚴(yán)格的管理。根據(jù)我國商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的特點,本文提出了強制差異化管理、建立登記備案機制、引入轉(zhuǎn)移支付等多項可以借鑒的制度,從而為我國政府如何制定商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的相關(guān)管理政策提供了參考。
[Abstract]:Parallel import parallel import means that in international trade, when an intellectual property is protected by the importing country, a third party does not have the consent of the intellectual property owner or exclusive licensor. Parallel imports in the field of international trade in trademarks are parallel imports of trademarks, and parallel imports of trademarks are very common in the international market. Has become a part of the trade in trademark products that cannot be ignored. In the field of trademark parallel import, different countries have different policies. International treaties, such as the Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of intellectual property Rights (trips), also leave the right of option to various countries. Under this international environment, China's attitude towards parallel import of trademarks is not clear. Today, parallel imports of trademarks are becoming more and more common in China. How to understand the effect of trademark parallel import and how to manage trademark parallel import is the focus and difficulty of our country in the field of international trade and intellectual property trade. This paper studies the effect of trademark parallel import and the choice of management policy. Firstly, this paper analyzes the characteristics, forms, causes and main effects of trademark parallel import from the basic concept of trademark parallel import. On the basis of this, according to the unique characteristics, forms and administrative policies of trademark parallel import in China, this paper applies the relevant knowledge of microeconomics. This paper establishes the basic model of trademark parallel import in China, and analyzes systematically the influence of trademark parallel import on the price and quantity of trademark market, on the welfare of all parties in the market and on the total welfare of the market. In order to achieve the purpose of exploring the effect of trademark parallel import in China, this paper also studies the external effect of trademark parallel import and the litigation cost caused by the current management policy in view of the market situation in China. The article holds that the parallel import of trademark has positive and negative effects, and the fuzzy policy of our country has also caused the market inefficiency. Finally, the article synthesizes the various effects in the market and sets up the choice model of our country. According to the current situation of our country, in most industries, the positive effect of trademark parallel import is greater than the negative effect. Therefore, China should make a choice, on the basis of allowing trademark parallel import in principle, According to the characteristics of parallel import of trademark in China, this paper puts forward the mandatory differentiation management, the establishment of registration and filing mechanism, the introduction of transfer payment and other systems that can be used for reference. It provides reference for our government how to formulate the related management policy of trademark parallel import.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D997.1;F203;F752.61
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 儲敏;利益平衡在平行進(jìn)口中的把握與適用[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2004年05期
2 石晶玉;;商標(biāo)權(quán)領(lǐng)域平行進(jìn)口問題研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2006年07期
3 李長英;平行進(jìn)口產(chǎn)生的充分必要條件[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟科學(xué);2004年02期
4 楊晨,馬曉平;專利商品平行進(jìn)口取向的經(jīng)貿(mào)探析[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治論壇;2001年02期
5 鄭潔熹,余翔,方放;化妝品的平行進(jìn)口問題初探[J];經(jīng)濟師;2005年04期
6 高山行,范陳澤,趙麗莉;商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口行為的經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析[J];中國軟科學(xué);2003年08期
7 余翔;武蘭芬;;瑞典藥品平行進(jìn)口的實證分析及其對我國的啟示[J];科研管理;2007年01期
8 朱曉琳;;平行進(jìn)口問題分析[J];企業(yè)家天地(下半月);2005年03期
9 李長英;新舊產(chǎn)品的平行進(jìn)口對生產(chǎn)廠商產(chǎn)品開發(fā)行為的不同影響[J];經(jīng)濟科學(xué);2004年04期
10 楊盼盼;周瑾;;平行進(jìn)口及相關(guān)判例研究[J];金融與經(jīng)濟;2006年07期
,本文編號:1533167
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/1533167.html