本文關(guān)鍵詞： 中國礦業(yè)企業(yè) 礦業(yè)權(quán) 礦業(yè)權(quán)投資協(xié)議　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中國進(jìn)入了高速消費礦產(chǎn)原材料的時期，而國內(nèi)資源儲量已無法滿足工業(yè)發(fā)展的需求，因此越來越多的中國礦業(yè)企業(yè)選擇投資海外�；诘V產(chǎn)資源對國計民生的重要作用以及礦業(yè)權(quán)的特殊性，各個資源國對礦業(yè)權(quán)設(shè)置了不同程度的投資限制。資源所在國政府對礦產(chǎn)資源的經(jīng)濟主權(quán)是投資者的主要阻礙。投資方式主要分為兩種：一種是礦業(yè)勘探開發(fā)投資，其目的是取得探礦權(quán)以及相應(yīng)的采礦權(quán)；另一種是并購已取得礦業(yè)權(quán)的企業(yè)。發(fā)展中國家傾向于直接與礦業(yè)權(quán)投資者簽訂礦業(yè)權(quán)投資協(xié)議，以保證國家的經(jīng)濟利益；發(fā)達(dá)國家則傾向于限制外資的進(jìn)入，保護本國礦業(yè)企業(yè)的壟斷地位。這些限制主要體現(xiàn)在中國投資者與資源國政府、他國資源企業(yè)之間的礦業(yè)權(quán)投資協(xié)議之中。較之其他海外投資，礦業(yè)權(quán)投資的政治風(fēng)險更大、投資審查也更為嚴(yán)格。本文以礦業(yè)權(quán)和礦業(yè)權(quán)投資協(xié)議為落腳點，對我國礦業(yè)企業(yè)的海外礦業(yè)權(quán)投資進(jìn)行研究。 第一章概述了中國礦業(yè)權(quán)投資的基本情況和礦業(yè)權(quán)的內(nèi)涵，礦業(yè)權(quán)的特殊屬性使礦業(yè)權(quán)投資相比其他投資而言，有更嚴(yán)格的限制。資源所在國對自然資源的經(jīng)濟主權(quán)是國家控制礦業(yè)權(quán)投資的基石。第二章對礦業(yè)權(quán)投資協(xié)議進(jìn)行了分類討論。勘探投資協(xié)議的主體之一是資源國政府或其代表，標(biāo)的為探礦權(quán)及與之對應(yīng)的采礦權(quán)；礦業(yè)收購協(xié)議的標(biāo)的是企業(yè)已經(jīng)獲得的采礦權(quán)。中國企業(yè)面對兩種協(xié)議主體，所遭受的國家風(fēng)險有所不同。同時，礦業(yè)權(quán)投資協(xié)議也是對礦業(yè)權(quán)收益分配的直接體現(xiàn)。第三章對我國國有礦業(yè)上市公司的法律屬性進(jìn)行了探討。作為投資主力軍的國有企業(yè)，與中國政府的關(guān)系不清晰，是導(dǎo)致投資在資源國遭受質(zhì)疑的重要原因。第四章對礦業(yè)權(quán)投資協(xié)議中一些重要的條款加以分析；這些條款有別于其他投資，需要予以重視。這些條款涉及地探成果權(quán)的歸屬、礦區(qū)環(huán)境保護、穩(wěn)定條款和重新談判條款和土地使用權(quán)條款。第五章分析了礦業(yè)權(quán)投資協(xié)議的法律適用以及中國企業(yè)對投資協(xié)議的保護。在對以上條款討論的基礎(chǔ)上，，重視擔(dān)保機構(gòu)的信息評估并且在協(xié)議中增加相關(guān)利益方，進(jìn)而減少礦業(yè)權(quán)投資的風(fēng)險。
[Abstract]:China has entered a period of high-speed consumption of mineral raw materials, and domestic resources reserves can no longer meet the needs of industrial development. Therefore, more and more Chinese mining enterprises choose to invest overseas. Based on the important role of mineral resources to the national economy and people's livelihood and the particularity of mining rights, Various resource countries have set different investment restrictions on mining rights. The economic sovereignty of the governments of the countries where the resources are located is the main hindrance of investors. There are two main ways of investment: one is investment in mining exploration and development, and the other is investment in mining exploration and development. The purpose is to obtain the prospecting right and the corresponding mining right, the other is to acquire the enterprise which has acquired the mining right. The developing countries tend to sign the mining right investment agreement with the mining right investor directly in order to guarantee the national economic benefit. The developed countries tend to restrict the entry of foreign capital and protect the monopoly position of their mining enterprises. These restrictions are mainly reflected in Chinese investors and governments of resource countries. The political risk of mining right investment is greater than other overseas investment, and the investment review is more strict. This paper takes mining right and mining right investment agreement as the foothold. This paper studies the overseas mining right investment of Chinese mining enterprises. The first chapter summarizes the basic situation of mining right investment and the connotation of mining right in China. The special attribute of mining right makes mining right investment compare with other investment. There are more strict restrictions. The economic sovereignty of the country of resources over natural resources is the cornerstone of the state control of mining right investment. Chapter 2 discusses the mining right investment agreement classified. One of the main bodies of the exploration investment agreement is resources. Governments or their representatives, The subject matter is the prospecting right and the corresponding mining right; the object of the mining acquisition agreement is the mining right that the enterprise has already obtained. Chinese enterprises face different national risks in the face of the two kinds of agreements. At the same time, The third chapter discusses the legal attributes of the state-owned mining listed companies in China. As the main force of investment, the relationship between the state-owned enterprises and the Chinese government is not clear. Chapter 4th analyzes a number of important provisions in mining rights investment agreements, which are different from other investments and need to be taken seriously. Mining area environmental protection, stability clause, renegotiation clause and land use right clause. Chapter 5th analyzes the legal application of mining right investment agreement and the protection of investment agreement by Chinese enterprises. Attach importance to the information evaluation of the guarantee agency and add relevant stakeholders to the agreement, thereby reducing the risk of mining right investment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996;F426.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 史建軍;;我國企業(yè)海外投資的政治風(fēng)險及規(guī)避[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年05期

2 劉夏榮,方小美;伊拉克石油工業(yè)對外合作模式[J];國際石油經(jīng)濟;2002年12期

3 余振國;論礦業(yè)權(quán)的物權(quán)屬性及其法律完善[J];中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年01期

4 王淼;袁棟;;海洋礦產(chǎn)資源產(chǎn)權(quán)問題成因與對策[J];礦業(yè)研究與開發(fā);2007年05期

5 崔建遠(yuǎn),曉坤;礦業(yè)權(quán)基本問題探討[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年04期

6 康紀(jì)田;;論建立產(chǎn)業(yè)管制型的現(xiàn)代礦業(yè)制度[J];企業(yè)活力;2007年06期

7 王保樹;完善國有企業(yè)改革措施的法理念[J];中國法學(xué);2000年02期

8 王世軍;我國礦業(yè)問題的制度及其分析[J];中國礦業(yè);2005年04期

9 楊俊鵬;周妍;孫爽;胡克;劉大為;;我國礦山土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)測機制初探[J];中國礦業(yè);2010年S1期

10 胡振琪,趙艷玲,畢銀麗;美國礦區(qū)土地復(fù)墾[J];中國土地;2001年06期

本文編號：1532692