論WTO框架下的食品貿(mào)易規(guī)則
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 食品貿(mào)易 SPS協(xié)議 TBT協(xié)議 技術(shù)壁壘 出處:《湘潭大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:WTO框架下與食品貿(mào)易密切相關(guān)的協(xié)定主要是《衛(wèi)生與植物衛(wèi)生檢疫措施協(xié)議》(SPS協(xié)議)、《貿(mào)易技術(shù)壁壘協(xié)議》(TBT協(xié)議)這兩項協(xié)議。就食品而言,技術(shù)性貿(mào)易措施包括食品安全無直接聯(lián)系的標(biāo)簽要求、營養(yǎng)聲明、以及質(zhì)量和包裝規(guī)定等,當(dāng)涉及技術(shù)規(guī)章標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時,《貿(mào)易技術(shù)壁壘協(xié)議》優(yōu)先適用;與食品有關(guān)的衛(wèi)生與植物衛(wèi)生措施包括所有有關(guān)的法律、法令、要求以及程序,特別是最終產(chǎn)品標(biāo)準(zhǔn),加工生產(chǎn)方法,檢驗、監(jiān)督、出證和審批程序,有關(guān)統(tǒng)計學(xué)方法、采樣方法和風(fēng)險評估方法的規(guī)定,以及與食品安全直接相關(guān)的包裝和標(biāo)識要求,當(dāng)涉及衛(wèi)生和動植物檢疫措施時,《衛(wèi)生與植物衛(wèi)生檢疫措施協(xié)議》優(yōu)先適用。這兩個協(xié)定對世界食品貿(mào)易有著深遠(yuǎn)的影響,是世貿(mào)組織為改善全球貿(mào)易所進(jìn)行的一次卓有成效的努力,這些規(guī)則給世界貿(mào)易帶來了更大的透明度和更具秩序化的貿(mào)易環(huán)境。這兩個以消除貿(mào)易壁壘為目的的協(xié)議,通過建立食品國際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)體系和保持食品安全相關(guān)法律法規(guī)、措施的透明度等措施,共同確立了一個符合WTO規(guī)則的食品安全體制。 《貿(mào)易技術(shù)壁壘協(xié)議》關(guān)于食品貿(mào)易的規(guī)定主要體現(xiàn)在技術(shù)法規(guī)、合格評定程序以及技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)三個方面,來規(guī)范成員在采取食品貿(mào)易政策時的行為,不至于對國際貿(mào)易造成障礙。為了消除食品貿(mào)易中的技術(shù)壁壘,協(xié)議采取了多種措施,包括保持法律法規(guī)的透明度、保護(hù)發(fā)展中國家在食品貿(mào)易中的利益、建立各國食品認(rèn)證互認(rèn)制度等。而在《衛(wèi)生與植物衛(wèi)生檢疫措施協(xié)議》中主要是從食品衛(wèi)生檢驗檢疫和對食品安全進(jìn)行風(fēng)險評估等方面對成員間食品貿(mào)易加以規(guī)范。作為WTO重要成員國,我們必須在充分了解研究WTO對食品貿(mào)易的相關(guān)規(guī)則的前提下,結(jié)合我國具體國情和現(xiàn)實,對我國現(xiàn)今的食品貿(mào)易法律體系存在的問題予以研究和解決,不斷完善我國的食品法律法規(guī)、食品技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及食品貿(mào)易監(jiān)管體系。
[Abstract]:The agreements closely related to food trade under the framework of WTO are mainly the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures (SPS) and the Agreement on Technical barriers to Trade (TBT). Technical trade measures include labelling requirements that are not directly linked to food safety, nutritional statements, and quality and packaging requirements, with the TBT agreement being applied first when it comes to technical regulatory standards; Food related sanitary and phytosanitary measures include all relevant laws, decrees, requirements and procedures, in particular final product standards, processing methods, inspection, supervision, certification and approval procedures, relevant statistical methods, Provisions for sampling and risk assessment methods, as well as packaging and labelling requirements directly related to food safety, When it comes to sanitary and phytosanitary measures, the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures is given priority. These agreements have far-reaching implications for world food trade, Is a fruitful effort by the WTO to improve global trade, rules that have led to greater transparency and a more orderly trading environment for world trade. The two agreements aimed at eliminating trade barriers, Through the establishment of international food standard system, the maintenance of food safety laws and regulations, the transparency of measures and other measures to establish a food safety system in line with the WTO rules. The provisions on food trade in the Agreement on Technical barriers to Trade are mainly embodied in three aspects: technical regulations, conformity assessment procedures and technical standards, to regulate the behavior of members in adopting food trade policies. Not to create obstacles to international trade. In order to eliminate technical barriers in the food trade, the agreement adopted a number of measures, including transparency of laws and regulations, and protection of the interests of developing countries in the food trade, The Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures mainly regulates food trade among members in terms of food hygiene inspection and quarantine and risk assessment of food safety. As an important member of the WTO, On the premise of fully understanding the relevant rules of WTO on food trade, we must study and solve the problems existing in the current food trade legal system of our country according to the specific situation and reality of our country. Improve our food laws and regulations, food technical standards and food trade regulatory system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D996.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 張同林;;WTO背景下的國際食品安全規(guī)制協(xié)調(diào)及其局限性[J];華夏星火;2008年Z1期
2 欒信杰;朱力安·史瑟;;《TBT協(xié)定》下的國民待遇:從歐盟——農(nóng)產(chǎn)品與食品爭端談起[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動態(tài)與研究;2009年02期
3 蔡高強;;從月餅海外受阻談進(jìn)出口食品安全法律制度的完善[J];太平洋學(xué)報;2009年11期
4 王玉芳;;技術(shù)性貿(mào)易壁壘對我國進(jìn)出口食品監(jiān)管的影響及對策分析[J];檢驗檢疫科學(xué);2005年S1期
5 蔣士強;蔡春河;周勇;楊莉;;加入國際食品法典委員會(CAC)后引發(fā)的思考和啟迪[J];現(xiàn)代科學(xué)儀器;2006年01期
6 劉波;;綠色包裝壁壘對我國食品出口的影響[J];中國包裝工業(yè);2009年07期
7 李明剛;;《中華人民共和國食品安全法》解讀[J];中國標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2009年07期
8 王朝暉;王超;;歐盟委員會(EC)No 282/2008法規(guī)解析[J];中國標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2010年02期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 王燕;加入WTO以來我國出口食品安全的現(xiàn)狀分析及對策研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2008年
2 徐擁山;論食品安全問題的國際法規(guī)制[D];安徽大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號:1502381
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/1502381.html