本文關(guān)鍵詞： 大陸架劃界規(guī)則 公平原則 自然延伸 等距離線　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在當(dāng)今世界各國(guó)以科學(xué)和資源為支撐大力發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的背景下,能源已經(jīng)成為重要的影響因素之一。海洋和大陸架有著巨大的可開發(fā)空間,隨著人類對(duì)于大陸架的研究與開發(fā)的不斷深入,大陸架制度得到逐步完善。大陸架劃界規(guī)則爭(zhēng)議中真正的法律問題是大陸架權(quán)利制度。沿海國(guó)對(duì)于劃界的爭(zhēng)議并沒有因1958年《大陸架公約》和1982年《聯(lián)合國(guó)公約》的生效而停止,相反,隨著各國(guó)經(jīng)政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、軍事力量競(jìng)爭(zhēng)日趨激烈,各國(guó)對(duì)于大陸架所能帶來的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益更為渴求。在此大背景下,本文擬從法學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)的角度,運(yùn)用比較和分析的方法,通過分析和比較自1958年以來聯(lián)合國(guó)通過的各項(xiàng)公約及國(guó)際法院的司法判例,對(duì)當(dāng)今國(guó)際法學(xué)界的大陸架劃界規(guī)則進(jìn)行評(píng)析,并提出相關(guān)建議。 根據(jù)提出問題、分析問題、借鑒經(jīng)驗(yàn)和提出建議的相關(guān)步驟,本論文將分為四部分,主要內(nèi)容如下: 第一章通過列舉大陸架劃界規(guī)則中的幾項(xiàng)具體規(guī)則,試圖分析這些規(guī)則或原則的產(chǎn)生和演變過程,闡述各項(xiàng)規(guī)則或原則在解決劃界爭(zhēng)議中的地位。分析各項(xiàng)規(guī)則或原則產(chǎn)生的時(shí)代背景和其他一切相關(guān)因素,對(duì)于如何在今后國(guó)際法院的個(gè)案審判中既不產(chǎn)生前后矛盾的司法判例又能平衡各國(guó)相關(guān)利益具有重大借鑒意義。 第二章主要通過分析和比較的方法,以公平原則為中心,闡述自然延伸原則及等距離規(guī)則中內(nèi)在的公平和正義性。公平原則作為指導(dǎo)大陸架劃界規(guī)則的出發(fā)點(diǎn)和歸宿點(diǎn),要求一個(gè)“公平的結(jié)果”。在通過一系列程序后所得到的這個(gè)結(jié)果中包含了自然延伸原則和等距離規(guī)則的應(yīng)用。 第三章著重分析在沿海國(guó)大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)議解決過程中必須考慮的一些其他因素。大陸架劃界規(guī)則適用中的“一切有關(guān)情況”貫穿整個(gè)劃界活動(dòng)中,它包括了地質(zhì)、比例、島嶼等一系列相關(guān)因素。這些因素的復(fù)雜性值得聯(lián)合國(guó)國(guó)際法院的司法判例中反復(fù)推敲和權(quán)衡。正因?yàn)槿绱?個(gè)案中具體相關(guān)因素的提出和論證對(duì)于劃界活動(dòng)的“公平結(jié)果”將起到舉足輕重的作用。 第四章在結(jié)合第二章、第三章中劃界規(guī)則及相關(guān)因素分析的基礎(chǔ)上,針對(duì)中日長(zhǎng)久以來關(guān)于東海大陸架爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)的一些因素進(jìn)行分析,試圖找到兼顧中日雙方主權(quán)、經(jīng)濟(jì)、歷史遺留問題等相關(guān)利益的折中方法。中日大陸架爭(zhēng)端的解決必定將有利于雙方可持續(xù)發(fā)展,同時(shí)給予中國(guó)在同其他相鄰沿海國(guó)可能產(chǎn)生的大陸架爭(zhēng)議一些參考和借鑒。
[Abstract]:Under the background of science and resources, energy has become one of the most important factors. The ocean and continental shelf have huge exploitable space. With the development of the continental shelf. The real legal issue in the dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf is the regime of the right to the continental shelf. The dispute between coastal States on the delimitation of the continental shelf has not resulted from the 1958 Convention on the Continental Shelf and the 1982 Convention on the delineation of the Continental Shelf. The entry into force of the United Nations Convention ceases. On the contrary, with the increasingly fierce competition of political, economic and military forces, countries are more eager for the economic benefits brought by the continental shelf. Under this background, this paper intends to study from the angle of law and sociology. Through the analysis and comparison of the conventions adopted by the United Nations since 1958 and the judicial jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice, the current rules of delimitation of the continental shelf in international legal circles are evaluated by means of comparison and analysis. And put forward relevant suggestions. This paper will be divided into four parts according to the questions raised, the analysis of the problems, the experience and the relevant steps. The main contents are as follows: Chapter I attempts to analyse the process of the emergence and evolution of these rules or principles by enumerating several specific rules in the rules governing the delimitation of the continental shelf. Explain the status of the rules or principles in the settlement of delimitation disputes. Analyze the background of the times and all other relevant factors of the rules or principles. It is of great significance for how to balance the relevant interests of various countries without producing inconsistent judicial precedents in the case trials of the International Court of Justice in the future. The second chapter focuses on the principle of equity by means of analysis and comparison. This paper expounds the inherent fairness and justice in the principle of natural extension and the rule of equal distance, which is the starting point and destination of the rules governing the delimitation of the continental shelf. A "fair result" is required. The result obtained after a series of procedures contains the application of the principle of natural extension and the rule of equidistance. The third chapter focuses on the analysis of some other factors that must be taken into account in the process of the dispute settlement of the delimitation of the continental shelf of the coastal State... the "all relevant circumstances" in the application of the rules governing the delimitation of the continental shelf permeate the entire delimitation activities. It includes a range of related factors, such as geology, proportions, islands and so on. The complexity of these factors deserves repeated scrutiny and balance in the jurisprudence of the United Nations International Court of Justice. The presentation and demonstration of specific relevant factors will play an important role in the "fair result" of demarcation activities. Based on the analysis of delimitation rules and related factors in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3, Chapter 4th analyzes some of the factors that have long been the focus of dispute between China and Japan on the continental shelf of the East China Sea. Trying to find a compromise between the interests of China and Japan, such as sovereignty, economy, historical issues, etc. The settlement of the continental shelf dispute between China and Japan will definitely be conducive to the sustainable development of both sides. At the same time, it gives some reference to the possible continental shelf disputes between China and other neighboring coastal states.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D993.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王秀英;;中日東海大陸架劃界中的若干關(guān)鍵問題[J];東北亞論壇;2007年06期

2 李廣義;東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)端國(guó)際法依據(jù)辨證[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年03期

3 曲波;;對(duì)大陸架劃界的幾個(gè)問題的思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年04期

4 吳潔;;國(guó)際海洋與海洋專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)權(quán)益維護(hù)研究[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2007年01期

5 吳慧;;國(guó)際海洋法爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制對(duì)釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的影響[J];國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

6 張衛(wèi)彬;;海洋劃界的趨勢(shì)與相關(guān)情況規(guī)則——黑海劃界案對(duì)我國(guó)海域劃界的啟示[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

7 李令華;譚樹東;;國(guó)際海洋邊界劃定理論和方法的新進(jìn)展[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2006年04期

8 賈宇;;“沖之鳥”涉及的法律問題[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2009年08期

9 趙慶龍;;大陸架劃界原則的國(guó)際法實(shí)踐[J];科技信息(科學(xué)教研);2008年08期

10 張新軍;;法律適用中的時(shí)間要素——中日東海爭(zhēng)端關(guān)鍵日期和時(shí)際法問題考察[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 呂彩霞;論我國(guó)海域使用管理及其法律制度[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2003年

2 金永明;國(guó)際海底區(qū)域的法律地位與資源開發(fā)制度研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

3 王勇;條約在中國(guó)適用之基本理論問題研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 禹湘;試析島嶼在海洋劃界中的效力[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2002年

2 徐文健;東海東北部大陸架劃界問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：1491309