本文關(guān)鍵詞： 國(guó)際刑事法院羅馬規(guī)約 締約國(guó) 加入動(dòng)機(jī)　出處：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：國(guó)際刑事法院是依據(jù)《羅馬規(guī)約》而建立的，它是獨(dú)立于任何國(guó)家或國(guó)際組織之外的國(guó)際刑事司法機(jī)構(gòu)，，并且通過(guò)協(xié)議與聯(lián)合國(guó)建立合作關(guān)系。國(guó)際刑事法院的設(shè)立對(duì)現(xiàn)有的政治格局產(chǎn)生了沖擊，也深刻影響了不干涉內(nèi)政原則和傳統(tǒng)的國(guó)家主權(quán)觀念。因此，《羅馬規(guī)約》對(duì)世界的影響力也正在加速，它的一些規(guī)定超越了民族與國(guó)家的層面，必然會(huì)與一些國(guó)家產(chǎn)生一定的沖突。對(duì)法院的運(yùn)作，不同的人會(huì)有不同的理解，而世界各國(guó)也出于不同的目的選擇加入或不加入規(guī)約。這為我們展開(kāi)了關(guān)于締約國(guó)加入動(dòng)機(jī)的研究視角，既有重要的理論意義，也有迫切的實(shí)踐意義，不僅可以使我們?cè)鲞M(jìn)對(duì)這一體系及國(guó)際刑法的理解，同時(shí)有利于中國(guó)審時(shí)度勢(shì)做出更好的選擇。 中國(guó)作為一個(gè)無(wú)論是人口上還是領(lǐng)土上都占據(jù)了絕對(duì)數(shù)量的國(guó)家卻由于一些原因一直游離于該規(guī)約，這就無(wú)疑在構(gòu)架世界和平與安全的過(guò)程中缺少著重要的支撐。中國(guó)不加入《羅馬規(guī)約》固然有其深刻復(fù)雜的現(xiàn)實(shí)和歷史原因，但是從中國(guó)加入《羅馬規(guī)約》的有利因素以及對(duì)中國(guó)當(dāng)前關(guān)于《羅馬規(guī)約》問(wèn)題的積極性解讀來(lái)看，我們應(yīng)該保持一種積極樂(lè)觀的態(tài)度，我們有理由相信：中國(guó)一定會(huì)在對(duì)待侵略罪以及有關(guān)國(guó)際刑事法院的諸多問(wèn)題上，做出與時(shí)俱進(jìn)的調(diào)整與努力。 文章首先對(duì)《羅馬規(guī)約》的歷史沿革、原則做一定的介紹，接著分別從締約國(guó)和非締約國(guó)的角度來(lái)分析其加入或反對(duì)加入規(guī)約的動(dòng)機(jī)，并結(jié)合相關(guān)國(guó)家進(jìn)行探討。最后將視角轉(zhuǎn)向中國(guó)，結(jié)合中國(guó)的實(shí)際情況，對(duì)中國(guó)未加入國(guó)際刑事法院的動(dòng)因以及中國(guó)未來(lái)加入的可能性進(jìn)行分析，并提出一些建議。
[Abstract]:The International Criminal Court, established by the Rome Statute, is an international criminal justice body independent of any State or international organization. The establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has had an impact on the existing political structure, and has also profoundly affected the principle of non-interference in internal affairs and the traditional concept of national sovereignty. The impact of the Rome Statute on the world is also accelerating. Some of its provisions go beyond the national and national dimensions and will inevitably create certain conflicts with some States... for the functioning of the Court. Different people will have different understanding, and countries in the world choose to join or not to accede to the Statute for different purposes. This provides us with a research perspective on the motives of States parties' accession, which has important theoretical significance. There is also an urgent practical significance, not only to enhance our understanding of this system and international criminal law, but also to make a better choice for China to judge the situation. China as a population and territory has occupied an absolute number of countries but for some reasons has been drifting away from the Statute. There is no doubt that there is a lack of important support in the process of establishing world peace and security. China's non-accession to the Rome Statute certainly has its profound and complicated realistic and historical reasons. However, we should maintain a positive and optimistic attitude from the favorable factors of China's accession to the Rome Statute and the positive interpretation of China's current problems concerning the Rome Statute. We have reason to believe that China will make adjustments and efforts with the times in dealing with the crime of aggression and many issues concerning the International Criminal Court. The article first introduces the history and principles of Rome Statute, and then analyzes the motives of its accession or opposition from the angle of both States parties and non-parties. In the end, we turn to China from the perspective of the relevant countries, combining with the actual situation of China, to analyze the motivation of China's non-accession to the International Criminal Court and the possibility of China joining the International Criminal Court in the future. Some suggestions are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D997.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 喻貴英;;析美國(guó)反對(duì)常設(shè)國(guó)際刑事法院的理由和舉措[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

2 朱文奇;;中國(guó)是否應(yīng)加入國(guó)際刑事法院(下)[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年11期

3 李雪平;《羅馬規(guī)約》與國(guó)際刑事法院面臨的法律問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年06期

4 王琰;;從國(guó)際刑事法院管轄權(quán)看中國(guó)加入國(guó)際刑事法院之前景[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年14期

5 于鵬;;論國(guó)際刑事法院管轄權(quán)補(bǔ)充性原則與非締約國(guó)主權(quán)的沖突[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年18期

6 宋丹楓;;有關(guān)《羅馬規(guī)約》的中國(guó)選擇——以危害人類罪為視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年24期

7 楊光;;中國(guó)加入國(guó)際刑事法院?jiǎn)栴}研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年36期

8 馬冠群;;中國(guó)未加入國(guó)際刑事法院原因探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年16期

9 孫逸瑯;;淺論國(guó)際刑事法院?jiǎn)?dòng)機(jī)制[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年01期

10 段一帆;;國(guó)際刑事法庭規(guī)則在南非的應(yīng)用[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年06期

本文編號(hào)：1481482