本文關(guān)鍵詞： 國際刑事法院 非締約國 管轄權(quán)　出處：《西南財經(jīng)大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：由《羅馬規(guī)約》而建立的國際刑事法院是一個常設(shè)的國際司法機構(gòu),旨在調(diào)查、起訴、懲處涉嫌最嚴重的國際犯罪行為的人。這些犯罪行為包括滅絕種族罪,危害人類罪,侵略罪和戰(zhàn)爭罪。 自2002年7月1日成立至今,已有100個國家批準加入了《羅馬規(guī)約》,但也有如中國、美國等世界大國并未參加《羅馬規(guī)約》,沒有成為國際刑事法院的當事國。由于是基于條約建立的機構(gòu),國際刑事法院主要在其締約國之間有約束力。但國際刑事法院在特定情況下也調(diào)整其與非締約國之間的關(guān)系,主張對其非締約國實施管轄。由于非締約國所牽涉問題的敏感性及復(fù)雜性,尤以國際刑事法院的管轄權(quán)與非締約國的國家主權(quán)碰撞為代表,兩者的關(guān)系一直是國際社會的關(guān)注點,存在爭議。本文以國際刑事法院簽署蘇丹總統(tǒng)逮捕令所引起的新一輪關(guān)注熱潮為切入點,結(jié)合國內(nèi)和國外對國際刑事法院管轄權(quán)的正當性和非正當性的意見,對其管轄權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀進行了分析,提出國際刑事法院與其非締約國應(yīng)該以合作為基礎(chǔ),實現(xiàn)其管轄權(quán)。同時,將中國與國際刑事法院的關(guān)系分析作為國際刑事法院對其非締約國管轄權(quán)的實踐應(yīng)用,再次探討國際刑事法院對其非締約國管轄權(quán)的行使問題。 本文緒論部分主要闡述了該論題研究的目的和意義,國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展趨勢,并陳述了本文的內(nèi)容和結(jié)構(gòu)。 本文的第一部分主要集中闡述了國際刑事法院對其非締約國的管轄權(quán),從國際刑事法院的管轄權(quán)現(xiàn)狀的分析,帶出蘇丹問題引出的管轄權(quán)爭議,引出國際刑事法院對其非締約國管轄權(quán)的正當性問題。 本文的第二部分探討國際刑事法院對其非締約國管轄權(quán)是否具有正當性的問題,通過對比分析“正當性”和“非正當性”兩種觀點,闡明本文的立場,即應(yīng)以合作為基礎(chǔ)實現(xiàn)國際刑事法院的管轄權(quán)。 本文最后一部分主要研討了國際刑事法院與中國的關(guān)系。在詳細分析了中國反對《羅馬規(guī)約》的原因后,展望了中國今后與國際刑事法院關(guān)系的可能性發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The International Criminal Court, established by the Rome Statute, is a permanent international judicial body designed to investigate, prosecute and punish persons suspected of committing the most serious international crimes, including genocide. Crimes against humanity, aggression and war crimes. Since its establishment in July 1st 2002, 100 countries have ratified the Rome Statute, but like China, the United States and other world powers have not participated in the Rome Statute. Has not become a party to the International Criminal Court... since it is a treaty-based body. The ICC is primarily binding among its contracting States. However, the ICC also adjusts its relationship with non-parties in certain circumstances. Claims to exercise jurisdiction over its non-parties... because of the sensitivity and complexity of the issues involved in non-contracting States, especially as represented by the collision between the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and the sovereignty of States not parties. The relationship between the two has always been the focus of attention of the international community, there are disputes. This article based on the International Criminal Court signed the arrest warrant of the Sudanese President caused a new wave of concern as the breakthrough point. Combined with the domestic and foreign views on the legitimacy and illegality of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, this paper analyzes the current situation of its jurisdiction, and points out that cooperation between the International Criminal Court and its non-parties should be the basis. At the same time, the analysis of the relationship between China and the International Criminal Court (ICC) is applied to the ICC's jurisdiction over its non-state parties. To explore again the question of the exercise of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over which it is not a party. In the introduction part, the purpose and significance of the research, the present situation and development trend of the research at home and abroad are expounded, and the content and structure of this paper are stated. The first part of this paper mainly focuses on the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over its non-States parties, from the analysis of the status quo of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, brings out the jurisdiction dispute arising from the Sudan issue. It leads to the legitimacy of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over its non-state parties. The second part of this paper discusses whether the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over its non-party jurisdiction has legitimacy, through comparative analysis of "legitimacy" and "illegitimacy" two points of view, clarify the position of this article. That is, the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court should be realized on the basis of cooperation. The last part of this paper mainly discusses the relationship between the International Criminal Court and China. After analyzing in detail the reasons for China's opposition to the Rome Statute, the author looks forward to the possible development of the relationship between China and the International Criminal Court in the future.
【學位授予單位】：西南財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 程文理;;皮諾切特案的豁免權(quán)與普遍管轄權(quán)分析[J];法制與社會;2012年21期

2 徐立;;國際刑事法院若干問題研究[J];武漢大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年03期

3 曾令良;國際法發(fā)展的歷史性突破——《國際刑事法院規(guī)約》述評[J];中國社會科學;1999年02期

，

本文編號：1477702