本文關(guān)鍵詞： 最惠國(guó)待遇條款 爭(zhēng)端解決 ICSID仲裁　出處：《新疆大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：最惠國(guó)待遇條款是當(dāng)代國(guó)際商事條約的重要內(nèi)容，也是多邊主義的核心，同時(shí)也被稱為國(guó)際投資協(xié)議的基石。一直以來(lái)，最惠國(guó)待遇條款只適用于實(shí)體問(wèn)題，但是近年來(lái)不少投資者都主張將最惠國(guó)待遇條款擴(kuò)展適用于爭(zhēng)端解決程序，即通過(guò)援引最惠國(guó)條款適用第三方條約中更為有利的條約權(quán)利。國(guó)際仲裁實(shí)踐以及國(guó)際法學(xué)者在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上都存在著很大分歧。 本文探討的中心問(wèn)題是，在基礎(chǔ)條約沒(méi)有規(guī)定最惠國(guó)待遇條款可以在爭(zhēng)端解決程序中加以適用時(shí)，最惠國(guó)條款能否適用于爭(zhēng)端解決程序。具體來(lái)說(shuō)，就是投資者能否援引最惠國(guó)待遇條款進(jìn)而享有第三方條約中有關(guān)爭(zhēng)端解決程序的條約待遇�？v觀全文，本文首先介紹最惠國(guó)待遇的歷史沿革及基本理論，接著闡述爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題的起源，并通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)案例的分析，提出本文對(duì)于爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題即最惠國(guó)條款能否適用于爭(zhēng)端解決事項(xiàng)的看法，最后為我國(guó)應(yīng)如何應(yīng)對(duì)國(guó)際新形勢(shì)提出建言。 本文除了引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外，主要由四部分組成：本文第一部分對(duì)最惠國(guó)待遇的基本理論做以簡(jiǎn)單分析，并對(duì)最惠國(guó)待遇條款的一般適用范圍及在國(guó)際投資仲裁中的適用范圍作以介紹；第二部分從國(guó)際仲裁實(shí)踐中最最惠國(guó)待遇的擴(kuò)大適用進(jìn)行歸納；第三部分基于前述分析，探討最惠國(guó)待遇條款的本質(zhì)；第四部分以Ekran(伊佳蘭有限公司)訴中國(guó)案為切入點(diǎn)深入介紹了我國(guó)未來(lái)涉訴的威脅之大，面對(duì)Ekran案帶給我們的考驗(yàn)和警示，，我們應(yīng)在加強(qiáng)理論研究的基礎(chǔ)上，同時(shí)在實(shí)踐操作方面進(jìn)一步完善，才能使我國(guó)在國(guó)際舞臺(tái)上展現(xiàn)其大國(guó)形象，并能夠在國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中獲得更多的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益。
[Abstract]:The most-favoured-nation clause is an important part of contemporary international commercial treaties and the core of multilateralism, and it is also called the cornerstone of international investment agreements. However, in recent years, many investors have advocated the extension of MFN clauses to dispute settlement procedures. That is, the application of the more favorable treaty rights in third-party treaties by invoking the MFN clause. International arbitration practice and international law scholars have great differences on this issue. The central question discussed in this paper is whether the most-favoured-nation clause can be applied to the dispute settlement procedure when the basic treaty does not provide that the most-favoured-nation clause can be applied in the dispute settlement procedure. That is whether investors can invoke the most-favoured-nation clause and then enjoy the treaty treatment related to the dispute settlement procedure in third-party treaties. Throughout the full text, this paper first introduces the historical evolution and basic theory of MFN treatment. Then the origin of the dispute is expounded, and through the analysis of relevant cases, this paper puts forward the opinion of whether the most-favoured-nation clause can be applied to the dispute settlement. Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the new international situation. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper mainly consists of four parts: the first part of this paper makes a simple analysis of the basic theory of most-favoured-nation treatment. The general scope of application of MFN clause and the scope of application in international investment arbitration are also introduced. The second part summarizes the application of the most-favoured-nation treatment in the practice of international arbitration. The third part discusses the essence of the most-favoured-nation clause based on the above analysis. The 4th part takes Ekran (Igaran Co., Ltd.) v. China as the starting point to introduce the great threat of the future litigation in China, facing the test and warning brought to us by the Ekran case. On the basis of strengthening theoretical research and further perfecting in practice and operation, we can make our country show its image as a big country on the international stage and gain more economic benefits in international economic activities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 余勁松;外資的公平與公正待遇問(wèn)題研究——由NAFTA的實(shí)踐產(chǎn)生的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];法商研究;2005年06期

2 徐崇利;;從實(shí)體到程序:最惠國(guó)待遇適用范圍之爭(zhēng)[J];法商研究;2007年02期

3 魏艷茹;;論我國(guó)晚近全盤接受ICSID仲裁管轄權(quán)之欠妥[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2006年01期

4 王海浪;;最惠國(guó)條款在BIT爭(zhēng)端解決中的適用問(wèn)題[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2007年02期

5 阿克塞爾·伯杰;楊小強(qiáng);;中國(guó)雙邊投資協(xié)定新綱領(lǐng):實(shí)體內(nèi)容、合理性及其對(duì)國(guó)際投資法創(chuàng)制的影響[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2009年04期

6 陳輝萍;;《多邊投資協(xié)定》與國(guó)際投資自由化[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法論叢;2000年00期

7 李玲;;中國(guó)雙邊投資保護(hù)協(xié)定締約實(shí)踐和面臨的挑戰(zhàn)[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2010年04期

8 王貴國(guó);;世界貿(mào)易組織與最惠國(guó)待遇原則[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法論叢;2002年02期

9 王楠;;最惠國(guó)待遇條款在國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端解決事項(xiàng)上的適用問(wèn)題[J];河北法學(xué);2010年01期

10 李良才;;經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化背景下最惠國(guó)待遇條款的新發(fā)展[J];湖南財(cái)經(jīng)高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 趙麗;論最惠國(guó)條款在ICSID仲裁中的擴(kuò)大適用[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

2 汪宇婧;國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端中最惠國(guó)待遇適用擴(kuò)大化問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

3 方荀;ICSID仲裁實(shí)踐中最惠國(guó)待遇適用范圍問(wèn)題的研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

4 李蓓;論完善中外BIT解決“投資者—東道國(guó)”爭(zhēng)端的國(guó)際仲裁機(jī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1473396