本文關(guān)鍵詞： 國際商事仲裁 仲裁協(xié)議 有效條件 效力　出處：《大連海事大學》2012年博士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：國際商事仲裁是隨著世界經(jīng)濟發(fā)展而發(fā)展的,中國的仲裁制度起步較晚,并且具有明顯的中國特色。中國加入WTO后,對全世界的經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易產(chǎn)生了重大影響,但隨著世界經(jīng)濟的快速發(fā)展,也出現(xiàn)了大量爭議和經(jīng)濟糾紛,這對我國商事仲裁起到了客觀推動的作用。同時,也要求我國仲裁制度應(yīng)當注重立法的國際化,進而使中國的仲裁制度能夠更好地服務(wù)社會經(jīng)濟。 所有國家的仲裁立法和國際仲裁規(guī)則,都把仲裁協(xié)議作為仲裁管轄權(quán)取得的基礎(chǔ)。沒有仲裁協(xié)議,仲裁也就無從談起,所做仲裁裁決也就沒有法律效力。國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的性質(zhì)主要有四個學說理論,它們是契約論、司法權(quán)理論、混合理論、自治論,筆者贊同契約論,認為契約性是仲裁協(xié)議的本質(zhì)屬性。 國際商事仲裁協(xié)議成立的有效條件分為一般要件和特殊要件兩方面。仲裁協(xié)議內(nèi)容也必須是可執(zhí)行的,如果仲裁協(xié)議內(nèi)容對仲裁的約定不可執(zhí)行,那么仲裁協(xié)議內(nèi)容就毫無意義。國際商事仲裁協(xié)議生效后會對當事人、仲裁機構(gòu)、法院產(chǎn)生法律效力。首先是對雙方當事人產(chǎn)生約束力；其次是仲裁協(xié)議中會約定仲裁機構(gòu),也就是對仲裁機構(gòu)產(chǎn)生約束力。 國際商事仲裁協(xié)議效力擴張問題,有瑕疵的國際商事仲裁協(xié)議效力的認定及國際商事仲裁協(xié)議第三人的效力問題等,這些都是國際商事仲裁中出現(xiàn)的新問題,也是我國國際商事仲裁研究必須面對的問題。大多數(shù)國家在立法和實踐上都對這些問題采取鼓勵和支持的態(tài)度,我國亦應(yīng)如此。 中國加入WTO后,國際商事仲裁統(tǒng)一化運動必然會對中國產(chǎn)生影響。而我國仲裁法律制度還存在缺陷,其中對仲裁協(xié)議內(nèi)容的嚴格規(guī)定有別于大多數(shù)國家,這種限定實際是在當事人仲裁意愿之外另行附加條件,會導(dǎo)致當事人的仲裁意愿得不到尊重,這與仲裁的本質(zhì)不相符。我國仲裁法律制度的修改完善既要考慮世界先進仲裁立法,又要結(jié)合中國國情,這樣才能兼具世界性、民族性、現(xiàn)代性。
[Abstract]:International commercial arbitration develops with the development of the world economy. China's arbitration system starts late and has obvious Chinese characteristics. After China's entry into WTO, it has a great impact on the world's economic and trade. However, with the rapid development of the world economy, a large number of disputes and economic disputes have also appeared, which has played an objective role in the promotion of commercial arbitration in China. At the same time, it is also required that China's arbitration system should pay attention to the internationalization of legislation. So that China's arbitration system can better serve the social economy. The arbitration legislation and international arbitration rules of all countries regard arbitration agreement as the basis for the acquisition of arbitration jurisdiction. Without the arbitration agreement, arbitration would not be possible. The nature of the international commercial arbitration agreement mainly has four theories, they are contract theory, judicial power theory, mixed theory, autonomy theory, the author agrees with the contract theory. Contract is the essential attribute of arbitration agreement. The effective conditions for the establishment of an international commercial arbitration agreement can be divided into two aspects: general elements and special elements. The content of the arbitration agreement must also be executable, if the agreement of arbitration agreement is not enforceable. The content of the arbitration agreement is meaningless. The international commercial arbitration agreement will have legal effect on the parties, the arbitration institution and the court after it comes into effect. Second, arbitration agreement will be agreed to arbitration institutions, that is to say, binding on arbitration institutions. The expansion of the validity of the international commercial arbitration agreement, the recognition of the validity of the defective international commercial arbitration agreement and the effectiveness of the third party of the international commercial arbitration agreement are all new problems in the international commercial arbitration. It is also a problem that must be faced in the study of international commercial arbitration in our country. Most countries adopt the attitude of encouraging and supporting these problems in legislation and practice, and so should our country. After China's entry into WTO, the unification of international commercial arbitration is bound to have an impact on China. However, there are still some defects in China's arbitration legal system, in which the strict provisions on the contents of arbitration agreements are different from those in most countries. This kind of limitation is to attach conditions in addition to the parties' willingness to arbitrate, which will result in the parties' willingness to arbitrate not to be respected. This is inconsistent with the essence of arbitration. The revision and perfection of China's arbitration legal system should not only consider the advanced arbitration legislation in the world, but also combine with the national conditions of China, so that it can have both cosmopolitan, national and modern characteristics.
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭劍偉;;淺析仲裁第三人制度的構(gòu)建[J];長春教育學院學報;2012年01期

2 王毅;;仲裁條款約定法律視角分析[J];江蘇技術(shù)師范學院學報;2012年01期

3 唐蘊鋒;仲裁條款對第三人的效力[J];電子科技大學學報(社科版);2002年01期

4 余勁松;論跨國公司責任的法律依據(jù)[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1995年03期

5 翟云嶺;孫得勝;;論所有權(quán)保留[J];法學家;2010年01期

6 沈四寶;沈健;;中國商事仲裁制度的特征與自主創(chuàng)新[J];法學;2010年12期

7 劉曉紅;;海峽兩岸仲裁裁決相互認可與執(zhí)行制度之檢視與修正[J];法學;2011年12期

8 羅涵君;論國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的法律規(guī)制[J];中央政法管理干部學院學報;1997年06期

9 趙秀文;;從寧波工藝品公司案看我國法院對涉外仲裁協(xié)議的監(jiān)督[J];時代法學;2010年05期

10 劉德福,徐俊;論仲裁協(xié)議的效力及其瑕疵補救[J];價格月刊;2004年12期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 楊彩霞;;淺析歐盟法對仲裁協(xié)議效力保障之削弱兼評歐盟法院West Tankers案[A];中國仲裁與司法論壇暨2010年年會論文集[C];2010年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 劉曉紅;國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的法理與實證研究[D];華東政法學院;2004年

2 郭曉文;國際商事仲裁協(xié)議制度研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2005年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前5條

1 汪明月;國際商事仲裁協(xié)議效力擴張問題研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學;2010年

2 鄧娟;國際商事爭議可仲裁性之擴展[D];西南政法大學;2011年

3 吳瓊;合同轉(zhuǎn)讓產(chǎn)生的國際商事仲裁協(xié)議效力問題研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2003年

4 陳瑞子;論債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后仲裁協(xié)議對未簽字人的效力[D];中國政法大學;2003年

5 吉爽;論國際商事仲裁管轄權(quán)異議問題[D];中國政法大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1462148