【摘要】：經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)和所有權(quán)分離的現(xiàn)代公司制度的出現(xiàn)，導(dǎo)致權(quán)力從股東會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)移到董事會(huì)，隨著經(jīng)營(yíng)日趨專業(yè)和復(fù)雜，權(quán)力又漸漸轉(zhuǎn)移到管理層，股東作為公司主體只能越來(lái)越被邊緣化。而股東為了實(shí)現(xiàn)其投資收益，天然地具有監(jiān)督公司正常運(yùn)營(yíng)，保護(hù)公司利益的需求，為了幫助股東實(shí)現(xiàn)這種需求，各國(guó)均在立法中賦予了股東查閱權(quán)。我國(guó)2005年《公司法》雖然較93年《公司法》有了較大進(jìn)步，但仍流于簡(jiǎn)單，缺乏實(shí)際操作性，導(dǎo)致實(shí)踐中權(quán)利義務(wù)沖突嚴(yán)重，司法實(shí)務(wù)也缺乏統(tǒng)一性。本文通過(guò)比較法和實(shí)證的研究方法，總結(jié)查閱權(quán)行使過(guò)程中各種爭(zhēng)議，提出自己建議，并進(jìn)行論證，以期為完善股東查閱權(quán)制度提供參考和支持。 本文包括引言、正文和結(jié)論三個(gè)部分，正文由四章組成： 本文第一部分闡述了股東查閱權(quán)的基本理論，從股東知情權(quán)和股東查閱權(quán)的概念著手，分析其各自的內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)及其相互關(guān)系，闡述了股東知情權(quán)的作用及地位。接下來(lái)論證根據(jù)公司開(kāi)放程度的不同，知情權(quán)體系內(nèi)的立法重點(diǎn)也有所差別。再分析了查閱權(quán)的制度意義和我國(guó)公司法中定位的查閱權(quán)的性質(zhì)，對(duì)本文的中心概念“查閱權(quán)”的相關(guān)理論做了系統(tǒng)論述，以便為下文中建議的制度安排提供學(xué)理上的支持。 第二部分先從查閱權(quán)制度確立之初介紹中國(guó)的立法沿革，再總結(jié)其他各國(guó)的立法特點(diǎn)和國(guó)際立法趨勢(shì)，肯定我國(guó)公司法的不斷進(jìn)步的同時(shí)，也明確我國(guó)現(xiàn)行查閱權(quán)制度與國(guó)外成熟立法之間的差距； 第三部分是本文研究的重點(diǎn)，按照查閱權(quán)的制度構(gòu)架，，分別從查閱權(quán)的主體、對(duì)象、程序、行使方式和權(quán)利限制方面進(jìn)行論述，總結(jié)司法實(shí)務(wù)中常見(jiàn)的爭(zhēng)議點(diǎn)，結(jié)合國(guó)外立法和實(shí)踐，給出筆者建議； 文章的最后部分是針對(duì)上一章所提的爭(zhēng)議點(diǎn)，提出具體的解決方案，擴(kuò)大查閱權(quán)的主體和查閱范圍，完善權(quán)利行使程序和行使方式，列舉不正當(dāng)目的以增加權(quán)利限制的可操作性，系統(tǒng)完善股東查閱權(quán)制度，為立法修改和司法操作提供建議。
[Abstract]:The emergence of modern company system of separation of management right and ownership has led to the transfer of power from shareholders' meeting to the board of directors. With the increasingly professional and complex operation, the power gradually transferred to the management, and shareholders can only be marginalized more and more as the main body of the company. In order to realize its investment income, shareholders naturally have the need to supervise the normal operation of the company and protect the interests of the company. In order to help the shareholders to realize this demand, all countries have granted the shareholder access right in the legislation. Although the company law of our country in 2005 has made great progress compared with the company law of 1993, it is still simple and lack of practical operation, which leads to serious conflict of rights and obligations in practice, and lack of unity of judicial practice. Through the comparative law and empirical research methods, this paper summarizes the various disputes in the exercise of the right to review, puts forward their own suggestions, and demonstrates, in order to provide reference and support for the improvement of the system of access rights of shareholders. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The main body is composed of four chapters: the first part of this paper expounds the basic theory of shareholder's right of access, starting from the concept of shareholder's right to know and shareholder's right to access. This paper analyzes their internal structures and their relations, and expounds the role and status of shareholders' right to know. Then demonstrate that according to the different degree of openness of the company, the legislative focus of the right to know system is also different. Then it analyzes the institutional significance of the right of access and the nature of the right of access positioned in the company law of our country, and systematically discusses the relevant theory of the central concept of "right of access" in this paper, in order to provide theoretical support for the system arrangement proposed in the following article. The second part first introduces the legislative evolution of China from the beginning of the establishment of the right of access system, then summarizes the legislative characteristics and international legislative trends of other countries, affirming the continuous progress of the company law of our country at the same time. It also clarifies the gap between the current inspection right system of our country and the mature legislation of foreign countries. The third part is the focus of this paper. According to the system framework of the right of access, it discusses the subject, object, procedure, exercise mode and limitation of the right of access respectively, and sums up the common controversial points in judicial practice. Combined with foreign legislation and practice, the author gives some suggestions; The last part of the article is aimed at the dispute points mentioned in the previous chapter, put forward specific solutions, expand the subject of the right of access and the scope of access, improve the exercise of the right and the way to exercise it. Enumerating the improper purpose to increase the maneuverability of the restriction of rights, improving the system of shareholders' access rights systematically, and providing suggestions for legislative amendment and judicial operation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉彥灃;;公司董事查閱權(quán):美國(guó)法的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和啟示[J];比較法研究;2010年04期

2 吳高臣;;股東查閱權(quán)研究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年01期

3 袁達(dá)松;王喜平;;股東查閱權(quán)穿越:母公司股東權(quán)益保護(hù)的利器——相關(guān)美國(guó)法理論、實(shí)踐及我國(guó)制度的構(gòu)建[J];東方法學(xué);2010年04期

4 李建偉;;股東查閱權(quán)行使機(jī)制的司法政策選擇[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年03期

5 胡憲;;會(huì)計(jì)憑證舞弊審計(jì)及其防范[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年04期

6 劉海鷗;;論股東賬簿查閱權(quán)的行使[J];法律適用;2007年07期

7 宋從文;;股東知情權(quán)行使與限制之維[J];法律適用;2009年07期

8 蔣大興;超越股東知情權(quán)訴訟的司法困境[J];法學(xué);2005年02期

9 彭春凝;丁俊峰;;有限公司股東查閱權(quán)制度選擇的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

10 譚永強(qiáng);;論有限責(zé)任公司內(nèi)部受理股東行使會(huì)計(jì)賬簿查閱權(quán)[J];華章;2011年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 甘鵬程;股東查賬權(quán)制度探析[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

2 倪凌波;我國(guó)股東查閱權(quán)的立法、解釋與完善[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

3 任寬;論有限責(zé)任公司的股東查閱權(quán)[D];浙江大學(xué);2011年

4 李林;股東知情權(quán)制度研究[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2006年

5 王德麗;股東查閱權(quán)研究[D];南京理工大學(xué);2008年

6 邵亞香;股東知情權(quán)制度比較研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

7 李妮;論股東查閱權(quán)在公司法上的地位[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

8 賈國(guó)華;股東查賬權(quán)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

9 吳程程;論股東查閱權(quán)的保護(hù)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2012年

10 申峰;瑕疵出資股東的資格認(rèn)定研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：2469660