發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-05 06:32

  本文選題：善意休眠公司 + 保護(hù)制度��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),“休眠公司”作為公司法人的一種存在狀態(tài),在我國(guó)大量出現(xiàn),帶來(lái)了大量的社會(huì)問(wèn)題。與此同時(shí),我國(guó)雖然已有相關(guān)的法律規(guī)定和司法解釋,但是現(xiàn)行立法中并沒(méi)有采用“休眠公司”的概念,也未形成完善的相關(guān)制度體系。由于我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的相關(guān)法學(xué)研究和立法主要關(guān)注“休眠公司”所引起的負(fù)面效應(yīng),忽視了“休眠公司”對(duì)企業(yè)和社會(huì)的積極意義,對(duì)休眠公司采取否定的態(tài)度,不允許休眠公司存續(xù),妨礙了休眠公司積極作用的發(fā)揮。因此,本文從建設(shè)完善的休眠公司制度的角度出發(fā),在借鑒外國(guó)公司法的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國(guó)的實(shí)際立法情況,嘗試性地界定了可以用于我國(guó)公司法的“休眠公司”概念,并且為了方便休眠公司制度的研究,將“休眠公司”歸納為善意休眠公司和惡意休眠公司兩大類,還就休眠公司與其他類似公司狀態(tài)做了區(qū)別比較,以使本文研究的對(duì)象更加清晰。由于我國(guó)現(xiàn)行公司法和司法解釋中已有能夠較好地防治惡意休眠公司的規(guī)定,缺乏對(duì)善意休眠公司的保護(hù),本文以允許善意休眠公司存續(xù)為基本出發(fā)點(diǎn),將研究重點(diǎn)放在善意休眠公司的法律保護(hù)制度上。通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí)國(guó)情下對(duì)善意休眠公司的需求的分析和研究,論述了在我國(guó)建立善意休眠公司保護(hù)制度的必要性。并在結(jié)合國(guó)外先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)和國(guó)內(nèi)現(xiàn)實(shí)立法狀況的情況下,提出了在我國(guó)建立善意休眠公司保護(hù)制度的具體建議。希望通過(guò)本文的研究,為完善我國(guó)休眠公司制度的建設(shè),發(fā)揮善意休眠公司的積極作用,促進(jìn)我國(guó)社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)下,公司法學(xué)研究的健康全面發(fā)展,盡自己的一點(diǎn)微薄之力。
[Abstract]:In recent years, "dormant company", as a state of existence of corporate legal person, has appeared in large numbers in our country, which has brought a lot of social problems. At the same time, although there are relevant legal provisions and judicial interpretations in our country, the concept of "dormant company" has not been adopted in the current legislation, nor has it formed a perfect relevant system. Because the existing relevant legal research and legislation in our country mainly pay attention to the negative effect caused by "dormancy company", ignore the positive meaning of "dormancy company" to enterprise and society, and take a negative attitude towards dormancy company. Do not allow dormant companies to survive, hindering the active role of dormant companies. Therefore, from the point of view of building a perfect dormant company system, this paper, on the basis of drawing lessons from the advanced experience of foreign company law, combines the actual legislative situation of our country. This paper tries to define the concept of "dormant company" which can be used in the company law of our country, and in order to facilitate the research of dormancy company system, it classifies "dormancy company" into two categories: bona fide dormancy company and malicious dormant company. The differences between dormant companies and other similar companies are also given in order to make the object of this study more clear. Because of the provisions in the current company law and judicial interpretation which can prevent and cure the malicious dormancy company and lack of protection to the bona fide dormancy company, this paper takes the existence of the bona fide dormancy company as the basic starting point. The focus of the study is on the legal protection system of dormant companies in good faith. Based on the analysis and study of the demand of bona fide dormancy companies in our country, this paper discusses the necessity of establishing the protection system of bona fide dormancy companies in China. In combination with the foreign advanced legislative experience and the situation of domestic legislation, this paper puts forward some concrete suggestions for establishing the protection system of the bona fide dormancy company in our country. It is hoped that through the research of this paper, in order to perfect the construction of dormancy company system in our country, bring into play the positive role of well-intentioned dormancy company, and promote the healthy and comprehensive development of corporate law research under the socialist market economy in our country, Do your best.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程亦軍;;論俄羅斯證券市場(chǎng)[J];俄羅斯中亞?wèn)|歐研究;2006年04期

2 徐彥冰;吊銷營(yíng)業(yè)執(zhí)照的法律問(wèn)題探析[J];河北法學(xué);2004年10期

3 趙萬(wàn)一;王蘭;;私法視域下商事登記的重新解讀[J];河北法學(xué);2009年06期

4 劉沛佩;;從準(zhǔn)統(tǒng)一到分離:商事主體資格的回歸路徑——對(duì)商事登記行為的公私法性質(zhì)解構(gòu)[J];中共杭州市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

5 瞿毅;施衛(wèi)艷;;論中國(guó)公司法中公司社會(huì)責(zé)任的立法及其完善[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2010年09期

6 劉沛佩;;理論的誤讀:論商事登記立法模式的重構(gòu)[J];金陵科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

7 馮亞星;;公司非正常解散現(xiàn)象的分析與對(duì)策[J];科技廣場(chǎng);2010年02期

8 熊玉蓮;;英國(guó)公司審計(jì)制度及其啟示[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年12期

9 梁立;;我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)借殼A股上市的理論研究[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2010年23期

10 陶政;;物流公司解散法理與制度設(shè)計(jì)[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2008年19期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授 葉林;[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 孫強(qiáng);企業(yè)清算法律制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2003年

2 徐彥冰;公司清算法律制度之國(guó)際比較[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1980989