本文選題：公司法人格否認制度 + 強制清算　； 參考：《中央民族大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：公司法人制度的創(chuàng)立使公司獲得了獨立人格,并賦予股東以有限責任,極大地刺激了投資者的積極性,對經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展起著巨大的推動作用。然而在現(xiàn)實生活中,這一制度也帶來了公司股東濫用公司法人的獨立人格以達到不法目的的惡劣弊端。但此現(xiàn)象絕非偶然,而是法人制度內(nèi)在的缺陷。于是起源于美國的公司法人人格否認制度應(yīng)運而生,并在各國得到了充分發(fā)展。公司法人人格否認制度是為揭露公司背后真正的所有人濫用法人獨立人格和有限責任的行為而恢復(fù)投資人原始就應(yīng)該承擔的無限責任的舉措。公司法人人格否認不是對法人人格獨立原則的否認,而恰恰是對該制度的恪守和保護。我國新《公司法》在借鑒國外已有理論和實踐成果的基礎(chǔ)上也引進了公司法人人格否認制度,但只是原則性規(guī)定,在諸多方面還不完善。如在主體范圍、客觀情形、適用要件、結(jié)果程度等內(nèi)容上均無詳細規(guī)定,無統(tǒng)一標準,進而操作性亦不強。公司解散或者符合解散條件而不解散、不清算或者違法清算,是對公司法人人格濫用的表象。清算義務(wù)人借助公司債務(wù)的相對人是“公司”、公司與其股東的身份均獨立存在的理由為依據(jù)而怠于清算、違法清算或違法注銷已達到逃避公司債務(wù)或規(guī)避法定義務(wù)的目的。本文針對公司強制清算中違背清算義務(wù)的行為,旨在分析公司法人人格否認的特征、適用要件、適用情形等內(nèi)容,并比較借鑒國外較先進、成熟的制度規(guī)定,對完善我國相關(guān)立法、司法領(lǐng)域提出些許個人觀點,希望在司法實踐中對該制度的實施有所啟迪。
[Abstract]:The establishment of the corporate system makes the company gain independent personality, and endows the shareholders with limited liability, which greatly stimulates the enthusiasm of investors and plays a huge role in promoting the development of economy. However, in real life, this system also leads to the abuse of the independent personality of corporate legal person by shareholders in order to achieve the illegal purpose. But this phenomenon is not accidental, but the inherent defect of legal person system. Therefore, the corporate personality denial system originated in the United States came into being and has been fully developed in various countries. The denial system of corporate personality is a measure to restore the original unlimited liability of the investor in order to reveal the abuse of the independent personality and limited liability of the legal person by the real owner of the company. The denial of corporate personality is not the denial of the principle of the independence of corporate personality, but the adherence and protection of the system. The new Company Law of our country has also introduced the system of the denial of corporate personality on the basis of drawing lessons from the existing theories and practices of foreign countries, but it is only a rule of principle and is not perfect in many aspects. Such as in the subject scope, objective situation, applicable elements, the degree of results and other content are not detailed provisions, there is no unified standard, and then not strong operational. Disbandment or disbandment without disbandment, liquidation or illegal liquidation is a manifestation of abuse of corporate personality. The liquidation obligor is "the company" with the help of the relative party of the company's debt, and the reason that the company and its shareholders are independent exists in liquidation. The illegal liquidation or illegal cancellation has reached the purpose of evading the company's debts or evading the legal obligations. In view of the breach of liquidation obligation in the compulsory liquidation of a company, this paper aims to analyze the characteristics, applicable elements and applicable circumstances of the denial of the personality of a company as a legal person, and to draw lessons from the more advanced and mature regulations of foreign countries. The author puts forward some personal views on perfecting the relevant legislation and judicial field in our country, hoping to enlighten the implementation of this system in the judicial practice.
【學位授予單位】：中央民族大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 繳潔;;公司人格否認制度的司法適用[J];重慶科技學院學報(社會科學版);2008年06期

2 孔明;;從惡意不清算行為看公司清算制度的完善[J];中國工商管理研究;2007年04期

3 滕桂艷;;公司清算制度探析[J];華東經(jīng)濟管理;2007年07期

4 羅登亮;黃麗娟;;論我國有限公司清算制度的完善[J];人民司法;2008年05期

，

本文編號：1909074