本文選題：刑事職業(yè)禁止 + 犯罪預防��； 參考：《安徽財經(jīng)大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：關于行為人因為其犯罪行為而喪失從事某職業(yè)的資格,我國存在行政性從業(yè)禁止與刑事職業(yè)禁止兩種制度。行政性從業(yè)禁止,在《公司法》、《證券法》、《會計法》與《律師法》等法律中均有所涉及。行為人因其曾經(jīng)實施的犯罪行為,自動喪失擔任某職務或者從事某職業(yè)的資格,無需要人民法院作出宣告。刑事職業(yè)禁止,是指《刑法修正案(九)》明確規(guī)定的行為人因利用自己所從事的職業(yè)形成的便利條件實施犯罪,或者犯罪人實施違背其職業(yè)的特定義務被人民法院判處刑罰的,人民法院限制其在特定期限內(nèi)不得從事相關職業(yè),也是一種制裁犯罪人的預防性措施。在適用條件、適用程序與禁止期限等方面,行政性從業(yè)禁止與刑事職業(yè)禁止有著重大的區(qū)別。我國刑事職業(yè)禁止制度的建立,無疑是我國刑法的一項重大創(chuàng)新。這對于預防犯罪、防衛(wèi)社會以及更為合理地制裁犯罪人等,有著重大的作用。但是,我國刑事職業(yè)禁止制度創(chuàng)立時間不久,其自身有著一定的缺陷。第一,刑事職業(yè)禁止的適用條件并不完全合理。比如,刑事職業(yè)禁止的適用對象較為狹窄。第二,刑事職業(yè)禁止的適用程序不完善。對有關刑事職業(yè)禁止的職權分配、提起與執(zhí)行程序以及當事人的救濟措施,我國刑法沒有作出明確的規(guī)定。第三,我國刑法沒有規(guī)定有關刑事職業(yè)禁止的復權機制。這對于被職業(yè)禁止的公民是不公正的。第四,對曾實施犯罪的公民予以職業(yè)禁止,但是我國目前尚未構建統(tǒng)一的職業(yè)禁止制度。在職業(yè)禁止方面,我國刑法與其他法律、行政法規(guī)的關系存在一定爭議,這可能會導致刑法規(guī)定的職業(yè)禁止制度被架空或其他的不合理現(xiàn)象。我國刑法應當引入保安處分的概念,將刑事職業(yè)禁止作為保安處分對待。在此前提下,我國應當修正刑法對刑事職業(yè)禁止制度作出完善。第一,完善我國刑法對刑事職業(yè)禁止的適用條件。比如,更為具體地界定職業(yè)禁止適用的“刑罰要件”,擴大該措施的適用對象。第二,明確規(guī)定我國刑事職業(yè)禁止的適用程序。應當具體規(guī)定公安機關、人民檢察院、人民法院與執(zhí)行機關的各自權限,具體規(guī)定刑事職業(yè)禁止的提起、宣告、上訴與執(zhí)行的程序。第三,我國應針對刑事職業(yè)禁止構建復權機制,明確被職業(yè)禁止的公民可提前獲得職業(yè)從業(yè)權的條件與程序等。第四,我國應當針對因犯罪行為而喪失職業(yè)從業(yè)權的問題,構建統(tǒng)一的刑事職業(yè)禁止制度,由此徹底解決刑法與其他法律、行政法規(guī)何者優(yōu)先適用的問題。
[Abstract]:With regard to the disqualification of the perpetrator for his criminal behavior, there are two systems in our country: the prohibition of administrative employment and the prohibition of criminal occupation. Administrative practice is prohibited, which is involved in Company Law, Securities Law, Accounting Law and lawyers Law. The perpetrator automatically disqualified himself from holding a certain post or occupation because of the criminal act he has committed, and there is no need for the people's court to make a declaration. The prohibition of criminal occupation means that the perpetrator explicitly stipulated in the Amendment to the Criminal Law (9) commits a crime for taking advantage of the convenient conditions formed by his occupation, or that the offender has been sentenced to punishment by the people's court for carrying out a specific obligation to violate his profession, It is also a preventive measure to punish the offender by restricting the people's court from engaging in the relevant occupation within a specified period of time. In the aspects of applicable conditions, applicable procedure and prohibition period, there are significant differences between administrative practice prohibition and criminal occupation prohibition. The establishment of criminal occupation prohibition system is undoubtedly a major innovation in our criminal law. It plays an important role in preventing crime, defending society and punishing offenders more reasonably. However, the criminal occupation prohibition system in our country is not long since it was founded, and it has its own defects. First, the applicable conditions of criminal occupational prohibition are not completely reasonable. For example, the applicable object of criminal occupation prohibition is narrower. Secondly, the procedure of criminal occupation prohibition is not perfect. There is no clear stipulation on the assignment of powers and powers, the procedure of initiating and executing and the relief measures of the parties concerned in the criminal law. Third, China's criminal law does not provide for the criminal prohibition of the reinstatement mechanism. This is unfair to citizens who are banned from their profession. Fourth, the citizens who have committed crimes are prohibited by occupation, but the unified system of occupational prohibition has not yet been established in our country. In the aspect of occupational prohibition, the relationship between criminal law and other laws and administrative regulations is controversial, which may lead to the occupational prohibition system under criminal law being set up or other unreasonable phenomena. China's criminal law should introduce the concept of security measures and treat criminal occupational prohibition as security measures. Under this premise, our country should amend the criminal law to perfect the criminal occupation prohibition system. First, perfect our country criminal law to the criminal profession prohibition application condition. For example, define more specifically the "penalty elements" of occupational prohibition, and expand the target of application of this measure. Secondly, the application procedure of criminal occupation prohibition in our country is clearly stipulated. The respective powers of the public security organs, the people's procuratorates, the people's courts and the executive organs shall be specified, and the procedures for instituting, declaring, appealing and executing the criminal professional prohibition shall be specified. Thirdly, our country should construct the mechanism of reinstatement in view of the prohibition of criminal occupation, and make clear the conditions and procedures for citizens who are prohibited by the profession to obtain the right of employment in advance. Fourth, China should set up a unified criminal occupation prohibition system to solve the problem of criminal law and other laws and administrative regulations which should be applied first in view of the loss of professional employment right due to criminal acts.
【學位授予單位】：安徽財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 彭波;建議增設職業(yè)禁止的規(guī)定[J];政治與法律;1994年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前6條

1 林朋孫;刑法中職業(yè)禁止制度研究[D];華僑大學;2016年

2 梁艷;論刑法中的職業(yè)禁止[D];湘潭大學;2016年

3 何月娟;論我國刑法中的職業(yè)禁止[D];山東大學;2016年

4 李紅霞;刑事職業(yè)禁止制度立法完善研究[D];安徽財經(jīng)大學;2016年

5 張亦然;刑事職業(yè)禁止的司法適用研究[D];安徽大學;2017年

6 梁慧;我國刑事職業(yè)禁止制度研究[D];安徽財經(jīng)大學;2017年

，

本文編號：1871559