本文選題：表決權(quán)征集　切入點(diǎn)：開放性征集　出處：《延邊大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：股東表決權(quán)征集制度產(chǎn)生于美國,隨著現(xiàn)代化公司規(guī)模不斷擴(kuò)大,股東分布相對(duì)分散,為了獲得更多利益,節(jié)約成本,許多中小股東的發(fā)言權(quán)被剝奪,于是產(chǎn)生了股東表決權(quán)征集制度。隨后臺(tái)灣、日本、韓國等國家和地區(qū)相繼借鑒了美國這一做法,引進(jìn)并使用了股東表決權(quán)征集制度,但是各國立法使用的名稱不盡相同。臺(tái)灣稱其為“表決代理權(quán)征集”,韓國、日本稱“表決權(quán)代理行使的勸誘”,英美法系國家稱為“代理責(zé)任書勸誘”。1我國現(xiàn)今沒有確定的名稱。代理權(quán)征集,也稱為投票代理權(quán)的征集、委托書收購、征集表決權(quán)、征集投票權(quán)、委托書勸誘等等。筆者認(rèn)為,稱其為表決權(quán)的征集最為妥當(dāng),因?yàn)楸頉Q權(quán)的征集最能突出這一名稱的范圍特征。因?yàn)檎骷藢儆诖砣?被征集人屬于委托人,征集包含著委托-代理關(guān)系,所以說委托書征集,投票代理權(quán)征集等名稱易讓人產(chǎn)生誤解。所以本文使用表決權(quán)征集這一概念來進(jìn)行論述。 本文共分5個(gè)章節(jié)：第一章是緒論。第二章是表決權(quán)征集的概念、功能,主要介紹了表決權(quán)征集的概念、產(chǎn)生的法理基礎(chǔ)、積極功能和消極功能等。第三章介紹了國外的表決權(quán)征集制度,主要論述了美國和臺(tái)灣的立法例,包括征集主體,征集內(nèi)容,征集方式等。特別是在劃分征集主體上對(duì)開放性征集人資格和限制性征集人資格這兩類分別進(jìn)行了說明。美國因股權(quán)高度分散和市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)達(dá)所以適合適用開放性征集人資格,但臺(tái)灣地區(qū)主要以家族式企業(yè)為主,為防止職業(yè)董事和職業(yè)監(jiān)事侵害家族式企業(yè)股東的利益所以適用限制性征集人資格。本文所介紹的兩個(gè)對(duì)征集人資格的規(guī)定是目前這一制度最典型的立法例。第四章論述了我國表決權(quán)征集制度的現(xiàn)狀和立法建議。通過介紹我國近年來在國內(nèi)發(fā)生的幾個(gè)著名的股東表決權(quán)征集案例,分析得出每個(gè)案例所存在的問題：第一,我國尚未建立一個(gè)明確的適用于表決權(quán)征集的信息披露制度。第二,中小股東普遍存在對(duì)其他股東的不信任。第三,我國目前股權(quán)分散化程度不夠,這就使得表決權(quán)征集這一做法僅存在于少數(shù)股份相對(duì)分散的上市公司。隨后本文介紹了我國現(xiàn)有的關(guān)于表決權(quán)征集制度的規(guī)定,并分析了現(xiàn)有規(guī)定存在的諸多問題,最后提出了對(duì)我國現(xiàn)有有關(guān)表決權(quán)征集制度的立法完善建議。立法完善里提出,在立法方式上,我國應(yīng)在《公司法》和《證券法》下位的專門規(guī)范里規(guī)定表決權(quán)征集的操作性制度。在具體性規(guī)定上我國既不能像美國,也不能像臺(tái)灣地區(qū)那樣,對(duì)征集人不規(guī)定或者規(guī)定得極其嚴(yán)格,應(yīng)該符合我國國情和市場(chǎng)環(huán)境,只對(duì)征集人持股時(shí)間進(jìn)行限定；在征集內(nèi)容的規(guī)定上應(yīng)盡量縮小征集人與被征集人之間的信息差異；在征集方式的規(guī)定上應(yīng)建立以公平,公正,公開為原則的征集費(fèi)用承擔(dān)制度和寄送股東名冊(cè)的規(guī)定；在征集責(zé)任規(guī)則上還應(yīng)規(guī)定征集人在征集時(shí)有不當(dāng)之處所應(yīng)承擔(dān)的責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:Voting solicitation system produced in the United States, with the modernization of the company continues to expand the scale of shareholder distribution is relatively dispersed, in order to get more benefits, cost savings, many small and medium-sized shareholders the right to speak is deprived, so have the voting right of shareholder solicitation system. Then in Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and other countries and regions have the United States this practice the introduction, and the use of voting solicitation system, but to use the name of legislation of different countries. Taiwan called "proxy solicitation", South Korea, Japan called "voting proxy solicitation", common law countries known as the "agency responsibility to".1 in China today do not determine the name. Proxy solicitation, also known as proxy solicitation, proxy solicitation, solicitation of voting rights, voting rights proxy solicitation solicitation, and so on. The author believes that called for the right to vote for the most Appropriate, because collecting the voting rights of the most prominent feature of this name. Because the collection of people belonging to the scope of the agent, is the collection of people belong to the principal, collection contains a principal-agent relationship, so that the proxy, the proxy solicitation name easily misleading. In the use of the proxy solicitation a concept to be discussed.
鏈枃鍏卞垎5涓珷鑺傦細(xì)絎竴绔犳槸緇.絎簩绔犳槸琛ㄥ喅鏉冨緛闆嗙殑姒傚康,鍔熻兘,涓昏浠嬬粛浜?jiǎn)琛ㄥ喯x潈寰侀泦鐨勬蹇，

本文編號(hào)：1684067