本文選題：公司自治　切入點(diǎn)：公司治理　出處：《暨南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：章程“另有規(guī)定”引發(fā)的效力之爭,很大程度上是因?qū)τ邢薰咀灾蔚目臻g認(rèn)識(shí)不清、界定不明所導(dǎo)致。依據(jù)章程“另有規(guī)定”的內(nèi)容,分別從公司治理、股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓、股權(quán)繼承三方面探討有限公司自治的空間。公司治理方面,公司自治可對(duì)股東會(huì)的通知程序和經(jīng)理職權(quán)享有高度的自治空間,而股東表決權(quán)方面涉及對(duì)股東權(quán)利的限制,公司自治應(yīng)受到一股一權(quán)原則的制約�，F(xiàn)行公司法賦予公司治理領(lǐng)域的自治空間未能適應(yīng)有限公司的特殊性,應(yīng)賦予有限公司治理領(lǐng)域更多的自主性,比如可對(duì)“三會(huì)”治理模式自主約定。至于股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓,公司在股權(quán)內(nèi)部轉(zhuǎn)讓和外部轉(zhuǎn)讓的程序上享有高度的自治空間;股東優(yōu)先購買權(quán)是股權(quán)對(duì)外轉(zhuǎn)讓時(shí)維護(hù)有限公司人合性的最后一道防線,不可被公司自治排除適用;強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓爭議的核心在于公司自治和股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓自由價(jià)值的博弈,有限公司的人合性優(yōu)先于股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓自由價(jià)值,在符合價(jià)格合理補(bǔ)償和程序合法的條件制約下,可約定強(qiáng)制股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓。至于股權(quán)繼承,指出現(xiàn)行公司法規(guī)定的股東資格繼承存在與我國繼承法、物權(quán)法相脫節(jié)的立法缺陷,應(yīng)確立股權(quán)繼承的法律規(guī)范;公司自治可完全排除股權(quán)繼承、限定特定人繼承或限制股權(quán)分割。
[Abstract]:The dispute of effectiveness caused by the articles of association "otherwise stipulated" is largely due to the unclear understanding of the space for limited company autonomy and the unclear definition. According to the contents of the articles of Association, they are separately from corporate governance and equity transfer. In terms of corporate governance, corporate autonomy has a high degree of autonomy for shareholders' meeting notification procedures and managers' powers, while shareholders' voting rights involve restrictions on shareholders' rights. Corporate autonomy should be restricted by the principle of "one share, one right". The autonomy space in the field of corporate governance has not been adapted to the particularity of limited companies, and it should be given more autonomy in the field of limited corporate governance. For example, the "three sessions" governance model can be independently agreed. As for equity transfer, the company has a high degree of autonomy in the internal and external transfer of equity transfer procedures; The shareholder's preemption right is the last line of defense to maintain the human harmony of limited company when the shares are transferred to foreign countries, and can not be excluded from the application of company autonomy, the core of the compulsory equity transfer dispute lies in the game between the company autonomy and the free value of equity transfer. A limited company shall have priority over the free value of the transfer of shares. Subject to the conditions of reasonable price compensation and lawful procedures, it may agree on the compulsory transfer of equity. As for equity succession, It is pointed out that the shareholder qualification inheritance stipulated in the current Company Law has the legislative defects which are out of line with the inheritance law and the property law of our country, and the legal norms of equity inheritance should be established, and the company autonomy can completely exclude the equity inheritance. To limit the inheritance of a particular person or the division of shares.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡大武;張瑩;;有限責(zé)任公司股東優(yōu)先購買權(quán)立法模式研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2007年06期

2 徐翔;;論有限責(zé)任公司股東除名規(guī)則的基本構(gòu)造[J];研究生法學(xué);2011年03期

3 朱慈蘊(yùn);;公司章程兩分法論——公司章程自治與他治理念的融合[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年05期

4 張澎;;論公司章程在有限責(zé)任公司股權(quán)繼承中的作用[J];法律適用;2007年01期

5 張大海;;有限責(zé)任公司股權(quán)繼承法律問題研究 兼評(píng)我國《公司法》第76條[J];法律適用;2008年04期

6 劉俊海;;論有限責(zé)任公司股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力[J];法學(xué)家;2007年06期

7 常健;;論公司章程的功能及其發(fā)展趨勢[J];法學(xué)家;2011年02期

8 王勇華;有限責(zé)任公司股份自由繼承的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];法學(xué);2005年10期

9 王艷麗;;對(duì)有限責(zé)任公司股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度的再認(rèn)識(shí)——兼評(píng)我國新《公司法》相關(guān)規(guī)定之進(jìn)步與不足[J];法學(xué);2006年11期

10 蔣大興;;股東優(yōu)先購買權(quán)行使中被忽略的價(jià)格形成機(jī)制[J];法學(xué);2012年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王毓瑩;公司章程自治研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

2 劉坤;公司自治研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

3 李曉霖;論股東資格確認(rèn)[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1683558