本文關(guān)鍵詞： 股東代表訴訟 當(dāng)事人 當(dāng)事人適格　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：股東代表訴訟制度是保護(hù)中小股東利益的一種重要手段,現(xiàn)在絕大多數(shù)國家和地區(qū)的公司立法均采納該制度。我國新《公司法》第152條首次在公司訴訟領(lǐng)域確立了股東代表訴訟制度,以往的研究多是對股東代表訴訟制度整體框架的構(gòu)建及相關(guān)制度的簡單介紹,但在司法實踐中,哪些股東有權(quán)提起股東代表訴訟、哪些主體可以成為股東代表訴訟的適格被告,以及公司和其他股東在訴訟中的地位如何確定等問題則更亟待解決。鑒于此,本文欲拋磚引玉,具體闡述股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人適格問題,以期對我國股東代表訴訟制度之完善有所裨益。 本文除引言和結(jié)語外,共分為五個部分,其主要內(nèi)容如下: 第一部分:概述 在該部分中,筆者對當(dāng)事人適格、股東代表訴訟的概念以及相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行了較為簡略的介紹,以期對股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人適格問題形成初步印象,為后面各部分具體闡述做好鋪墊。 第二部分:股東代表訴訟中當(dāng)事人適格理論之探索 該部分主要介紹了關(guān)于股東代表訴訟中當(dāng)事人適格的問題比較有代表性的幾種觀點,即訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)理論、訴訟上的監(jiān)護(hù)人理論以及廣義當(dāng)事人理論,通過對上述理論學(xué)說的分析,奠定研究股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人適格的理論基礎(chǔ)。 第三部分:域外股東代表訴訟中當(dāng)事人適格的立法考察 第三部分:以各國、各地區(qū)的立法、司法解釋等為論述對象,集中介紹了域外各國和地區(qū)對于股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人適格的相關(guān)立法規(guī)定。為了研究的方便以及形式上的清晰化,筆者又分了四個小部分進(jìn)行具體的對比分析,為我國股東代表訴訟制度中當(dāng)事人問題的構(gòu)建,提供了參考及借鑒的源泉。 第四部分:我國股東代表訴訟中當(dāng)事人適格之立法及司法實踐 該部分對我國立法及司法實踐中關(guān)于股東代表訴訟的當(dāng)事人問題進(jìn)行了較為全面的闡述,一方面,力爭做到全面深刻的了解我國股東代表訴訟的當(dāng)事人問題的現(xiàn)狀;另一方面旨在為本文的最后一部分(即我國股東代表訴訟中適格當(dāng)事人的入典思考)作一伏筆,使本文最后一部分的論述更具針對性和現(xiàn)實可操作性、更有說服力。 第五部分:我國股東代表訴訟中適格當(dāng)事人的入典思考 本部分是本文的重點也是本文的難點所在,筆者試圖在上述各部分的基礎(chǔ)上,對我國股東代表訴訟中適格當(dāng)事人的立法予以反思,并提出自己的一隅之見,希望能對我國的立法及實踐貢獻(xiàn)綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:Shareholder representative litigation system is an important means to protect the interests of minority shareholders. At present, most countries and regions adopt this system in their company legislation. Article 152 of the New Company Law establishes the shareholder representative litigation system in the field of company litigation for the first time. Previous studies are mostly about the construction of the whole framework of shareholder representative litigation system and the brief introduction of related system, but in judicial practice, which shareholders have the right to bring shareholder representative litigation. Which subject can be the appropriate defendant of shareholder's representative litigation, and how to determine the position of the company and other shareholders in the lawsuit is more urgent to be solved. This paper expounds the qualification of shareholder representative litigant in order to benefit the perfection of shareholder representative litigation system in our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into five parts, the main contents are as follows: Part I: Overview In this part, the author gives a brief introduction to the concept of party suitability, shareholder representative litigation and related theories, with a view to forming a preliminary impression of the party concerned in shareholder representative litigation. For the following parts of the specific elaboration to do a good job. The second part: the Exploration of the Theory of parties' suitability in shareholder Representative Litigation This part mainly introduces several representative views on the problem of the parties' suitability in the shareholder representative litigation, that is, the theory of litigation responsibility, the theory of guardian in litigation and the theory of generalized parties. Through the analysis of the above theories, the theoretical basis of studying the suitability of shareholder representative litigant is established. Part three: legislative investigation of the parties' suitability in the Extraterritorial shareholder Representative Litigation The third part: take the legislation of various countries and regions, judicial interpretation and so on as the object of discussion. Focus on the introduction of foreign countries and regions for shareholder representatives litigants relevant legislative provisions. For the convenience of the study and the clarity of the form, the author divided four small parts for specific comparative analysis. It provides reference and reference source for the construction of the litigant problem in the shareholder representative litigation system in our country. Part 4th: legislation and Judicial practice of the parties' suitability in shareholder Representative Litigation in China This part of our legislation and judicial practice on the shareholder representative litigation of the parties to a more comprehensive elaboration, on the one hand. Strive to achieve a comprehensive and profound understanding of the status of shareholder representative litigation of the parties; On the other hand, the purpose of the last part of this article (that is, in the case of shareholders' representative litigation in China) to make a foreshadowing, so that the last part of this article more targeted and practical maneuverability. More persuasive. Part 5th: reflections on the appropriate parties in the shareholder Representative Litigation in China This part is the focal point of this article is also the difficulty of this article, the author tries to reflect on the legislation of the appropriate party in the shareholder representative litigation on the basis of the above parts, and put forward his own views. I hope to make a small contribution to the legislation and practice of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 于海生;民事訴訟當(dāng)事人適格問題研究[J];北方論叢;2004年04期

2 蔡立東;;論股東派生訴訟中被告的范圍[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年01期

3 徐純先;國外股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人制度研究[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2005年03期

4 張文玲;淺探公司在股東代表訴訟中的法律地位[J];江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年03期

5 胡濱,曹順明;股東派生訴訟的合理性基礎(chǔ)與制度設(shè)計[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年04期

6 程宗璋;論我國公司股東權(quán)的司法保護(hù)[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年01期

7 李龍;民事訴訟當(dāng)事人適格芻論[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2000年04期

8 趙萬一;趙信會;;我國股東代表訴訟制度建立的法理基礎(chǔ)和基本思路[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年03期

9 羅培新;股東派生訴訟若干問題探討[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;1999年03期

10 徐尉;股東派生訴訟制度的構(gòu)建與完善[J];行政與法(吉林省行政學(xué)院學(xué)報);2005年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 馬秀梅;股東代表訴訟程序問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2003年

2 謝化祥;股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

3 閆志剛;論股東代表訴訟的當(dāng)事人[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1481546